Cargando…
Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis
During development, cortical (c) and medullary (m) thymic epithelial cells (TEC) arise from the third pharyngeal pouch endoderm. Current models suggest that within the thymic primordium most TEC exist in a bipotent/common thymic epithelial progenitor cell (TEPC) state able to generate both cTEC and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559721 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202163 |
_version_ | 1785085991986397184 |
---|---|
author | Farley, Alison Mary Chengrui, An Palmer, Sam Liu, Dong Kousa, Anastasia I. Rouse, Paul Major, Viktoria Sweetman, Joanna Morys, Jan Corsinotti, Andrea Nichols, Jennifer Ure, Janice McLay, Renee Boulter, Luke Chapman, S. Jon Tomlinson, Simon R. Blackburn, C. Clare |
author_facet | Farley, Alison Mary Chengrui, An Palmer, Sam Liu, Dong Kousa, Anastasia I. Rouse, Paul Major, Viktoria Sweetman, Joanna Morys, Jan Corsinotti, Andrea Nichols, Jennifer Ure, Janice McLay, Renee Boulter, Luke Chapman, S. Jon Tomlinson, Simon R. Blackburn, C. Clare |
author_sort | Farley, Alison Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | During development, cortical (c) and medullary (m) thymic epithelial cells (TEC) arise from the third pharyngeal pouch endoderm. Current models suggest that within the thymic primordium most TEC exist in a bipotent/common thymic epithelial progenitor cell (TEPC) state able to generate both cTEC and mTEC, at least until embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) in the mouse. This view, however, is challenged by recent transcriptomics and genetic evidence. We therefore set out to investigate the fate and potency of TEC in the early thymus. Here using single cell (sc) RNAseq we identify a candidate mTEC progenitor population at E12.5, consistent with recent reports. Via lineage-tracing we demonstrate this population as mTEC fate-restricted, validating our bioinformatics prediction. Using potency analyses we also establish that most E11.5 and E12.5 progenitor TEC are cTEC-fated. Finally we show that overnight culture causes most if not all E12.5 cTEC-fated TEPC to acquire functional bipotency, and provide a likely molecular mechanism for this changed differentiation potential. Collectively, our data overturn the widely held view that a common TEPC predominates in the E12.5 thymus, showing instead that sublineage-primed progenitors are present from the earliest stages of thymus organogenesis but that these early fetal TEPC exhibit cell-fate plasticity in response to extrinsic factors. Our data provide a significant advance in the understanding of fetal thymic epithelial development and thus have implications for thymus-related clinical research, in particular research focussed on generating TEC from pluripotent stem cells |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10407560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104075602023-08-09 Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis Farley, Alison Mary Chengrui, An Palmer, Sam Liu, Dong Kousa, Anastasia I. Rouse, Paul Major, Viktoria Sweetman, Joanna Morys, Jan Corsinotti, Andrea Nichols, Jennifer Ure, Janice McLay, Renee Boulter, Luke Chapman, S. Jon Tomlinson, Simon R. Blackburn, C. Clare Front Immunol Immunology During development, cortical (c) and medullary (m) thymic epithelial cells (TEC) arise from the third pharyngeal pouch endoderm. Current models suggest that within the thymic primordium most TEC exist in a bipotent/common thymic epithelial progenitor cell (TEPC) state able to generate both cTEC and mTEC, at least until embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) in the mouse. This view, however, is challenged by recent transcriptomics and genetic evidence. We therefore set out to investigate the fate and potency of TEC in the early thymus. Here using single cell (sc) RNAseq we identify a candidate mTEC progenitor population at E12.5, consistent with recent reports. Via lineage-tracing we demonstrate this population as mTEC fate-restricted, validating our bioinformatics prediction. Using potency analyses we also establish that most E11.5 and E12.5 progenitor TEC are cTEC-fated. Finally we show that overnight culture causes most if not all E12.5 cTEC-fated TEPC to acquire functional bipotency, and provide a likely molecular mechanism for this changed differentiation potential. Collectively, our data overturn the widely held view that a common TEPC predominates in the E12.5 thymus, showing instead that sublineage-primed progenitors are present from the earliest stages of thymus organogenesis but that these early fetal TEPC exhibit cell-fate plasticity in response to extrinsic factors. Our data provide a significant advance in the understanding of fetal thymic epithelial development and thus have implications for thymus-related clinical research, in particular research focussed on generating TEC from pluripotent stem cells Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10407560/ /pubmed/37559721 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202163 Text en Copyright © 2023 Farley, Chengrui, Palmer, Liu, Kousa, Rouse, Major, Sweetman, Morys, Corsinotti, Nichols, Ure, McLay, Boulter, Chapman, Tomlinson and Blackburn https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Farley, Alison Mary Chengrui, An Palmer, Sam Liu, Dong Kousa, Anastasia I. Rouse, Paul Major, Viktoria Sweetman, Joanna Morys, Jan Corsinotti, Andrea Nichols, Jennifer Ure, Janice McLay, Renee Boulter, Luke Chapman, S. Jon Tomlinson, Simon R. Blackburn, C. Clare Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis |
title | Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis |
title_full | Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis |
title_fullStr | Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis |
title_short | Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis |
title_sort | thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559721 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farleyalisonmary thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT chengruian thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT palmersam thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT liudong thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT kousaanastasiai thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT rousepaul thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT majorviktoria thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT sweetmanjoanna thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT morysjan thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT corsinottiandrea thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT nicholsjennifer thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT urejanice thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT mclayrenee thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT boulterluke thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT chapmansjon thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT tomlinsonsimonr thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis AT blackburncclare thymicepithelialcellfateandpotencyinearlyorganogenesisassessedbysinglecelltranscriptionalandfunctionalanalysis |