Cargando…

Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: An RCT

BACKGROUND: Selecting a suitable and preferable method for endometrial preparation in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles for women with adenomyosis is still challenging in infertility treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 artificial endometrial preparation regimens with and without gonadotropin-releas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eslami Moayed, Marzieh, Moini, Ashraf, Kashani, Ladan, Farid Mojtahedi, Maryam, Rezaee, Tawoos, Tabasizadeh, Hamed, Maajani, Khadije, Yamini, Nazila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Knowledge E 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560066
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i6.13635
_version_ 1785086070168223744
author Eslami Moayed, Marzieh
Moini, Ashraf
Kashani, Ladan
Farid Mojtahedi, Maryam
Rezaee, Tawoos
Tabasizadeh, Hamed
Maajani, Khadije
Yamini, Nazila
author_facet Eslami Moayed, Marzieh
Moini, Ashraf
Kashani, Ladan
Farid Mojtahedi, Maryam
Rezaee, Tawoos
Tabasizadeh, Hamed
Maajani, Khadije
Yamini, Nazila
author_sort Eslami Moayed, Marzieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selecting a suitable and preferable method for endometrial preparation in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles for women with adenomyosis is still challenging in infertility treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 artificial endometrial preparation regimens with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) pretreatment in women with adenomyosis undergoing FET cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 140 adenomyosis cases who underwent FET cycles at Arash Women's hospital, Tehran, Iran from May 2020 to March 2021. Participants were randomly allocated into hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) and HRT+GnRHa pretreatment groups (n = 70/each). Endometrial preparation with 2-6 mg daily estradiol was started in the HRT+GnRHa group, taking after down-regulation with the GnRHa. Within the HRT group, the same dose of estradiol was commenced within the early follicular stage. The main (chemical and clinical pregnancy rates) and auxiliary results (twin pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates) were compared between groups. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics and severity of adenomyosis, endometrial thickness, and pattern at starting progesterone administration were similar in the 2 groups, and triple-line endometrium was found to be the dominant pattern in both groups (p = 0.65). No significant differences were observed in chemical, clinical, and twin pregnancy rates as well as miscarriage and live birth rates between groups (p = 0.71, p = 0.81, p = 0.11, and p = 0.84, respectively). However, the total estrogen dose and duration of estrogen consumption were significantly higher in the pretreatment group (p = 0.001, and p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: These results indicated that the hormonal endometrial preparation with estrogen and progestin for FET cycles is as efficacious as a protocol involving preceding pituitary suppression with a GnRHa. Further large randomized clinical studies are required to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10407916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Knowledge E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104079162023-08-09 Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: An RCT Eslami Moayed, Marzieh Moini, Ashraf Kashani, Ladan Farid Mojtahedi, Maryam Rezaee, Tawoos Tabasizadeh, Hamed Maajani, Khadije Yamini, Nazila Int J Reprod Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: Selecting a suitable and preferable method for endometrial preparation in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles for women with adenomyosis is still challenging in infertility treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 artificial endometrial preparation regimens with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) pretreatment in women with adenomyosis undergoing FET cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 140 adenomyosis cases who underwent FET cycles at Arash Women's hospital, Tehran, Iran from May 2020 to March 2021. Participants were randomly allocated into hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) and HRT+GnRHa pretreatment groups (n = 70/each). Endometrial preparation with 2-6 mg daily estradiol was started in the HRT+GnRHa group, taking after down-regulation with the GnRHa. Within the HRT group, the same dose of estradiol was commenced within the early follicular stage. The main (chemical and clinical pregnancy rates) and auxiliary results (twin pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates) were compared between groups. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics and severity of adenomyosis, endometrial thickness, and pattern at starting progesterone administration were similar in the 2 groups, and triple-line endometrium was found to be the dominant pattern in both groups (p = 0.65). No significant differences were observed in chemical, clinical, and twin pregnancy rates as well as miscarriage and live birth rates between groups (p = 0.71, p = 0.81, p = 0.11, and p = 0.84, respectively). However, the total estrogen dose and duration of estrogen consumption were significantly higher in the pretreatment group (p = 0.001, and p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: These results indicated that the hormonal endometrial preparation with estrogen and progestin for FET cycles is as efficacious as a protocol involving preceding pituitary suppression with a GnRHa. Further large randomized clinical studies are required to confirm these findings. Knowledge E 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10407916/ /pubmed/37560066 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i6.13635 Text en Copyright © 2023 Eslami Moayed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eslami Moayed, Marzieh
Moini, Ashraf
Kashani, Ladan
Farid Mojtahedi, Maryam
Rezaee, Tawoos
Tabasizadeh, Hamed
Maajani, Khadije
Yamini, Nazila
Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: An RCT
title Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: An RCT
title_full Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: An RCT
title_fullStr Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: An RCT
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: An RCT
title_short Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: An RCT
title_sort pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, undergoing artificial endometrial preparation with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment in frozen embryo transfer cycles: an rct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560066
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i6.13635
work_keys_str_mv AT eslamimoayedmarzieh pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithadenomyosisundergoingartificialendometrialpreparationwithandwithoutgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistpretreatmentinfrozenembryotransfercyclesanrct
AT moiniashraf pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithadenomyosisundergoingartificialendometrialpreparationwithandwithoutgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistpretreatmentinfrozenembryotransfercyclesanrct
AT kashaniladan pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithadenomyosisundergoingartificialendometrialpreparationwithandwithoutgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistpretreatmentinfrozenembryotransfercyclesanrct
AT faridmojtahedimaryam pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithadenomyosisundergoingartificialendometrialpreparationwithandwithoutgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistpretreatmentinfrozenembryotransfercyclesanrct
AT rezaeetawoos pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithadenomyosisundergoingartificialendometrialpreparationwithandwithoutgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistpretreatmentinfrozenembryotransfercyclesanrct
AT tabasizadehhamed pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithadenomyosisundergoingartificialendometrialpreparationwithandwithoutgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistpretreatmentinfrozenembryotransfercyclesanrct
AT maajanikhadije pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithadenomyosisundergoingartificialendometrialpreparationwithandwithoutgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistpretreatmentinfrozenembryotransfercyclesanrct
AT yamininazila pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithadenomyosisundergoingartificialendometrialpreparationwithandwithoutgonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistpretreatmentinfrozenembryotransfercyclesanrct