Cargando…
Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design
INTRODUCTION: Successful press-fit implantation relies on an accurately reamed bone cavity. Inaccurate reaming can lead to a suboptimal press-fit risking fracture and cup deformation or excessive micromotion and loosening. Several factors may impact reaming accuracy including the reamer design, the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03888-1 |
_version_ | 1785086103398645760 |
---|---|
author | Karia, Monil Boughton, Oliver Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu Halewood, Camilla Wozencroft, Rob Clarke, Susannah Cobb, Justin |
author_facet | Karia, Monil Boughton, Oliver Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu Halewood, Camilla Wozencroft, Rob Clarke, Susannah Cobb, Justin |
author_sort | Karia, Monil |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Successful press-fit implantation relies on an accurately reamed bone cavity. Inaccurate reaming can lead to a suboptimal press-fit risking fracture and cup deformation or excessive micromotion and loosening. Several factors may impact reaming accuracy including the reamer design, the surgeon’s technique and the bone quality. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of reaming techniques and the accuracy of a novel reamer design. METHODS: Eighty composite bone models, half high density and half low density, were reamed with either a conventional or an additively manufactured reamer with a novel design employing either a straight or ‘whirlwind’ reaming technique. Reamed cavities were scanned using a 3D laser scanner and the median difference between achieved and expected diameters compared. RESULTS: The novel reamer design was more accurate than the unused conventional reamer, using both whirlwind (0.1 mm (IQR 0–0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.3–0.4); p < 0.001) and straight techniques (0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–1.0) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1–1.6); p = 0.001). Whirlwind reaming was more accurate than straight reaming using both conventional (0.3 mm (IQR 0.3–0.4) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1–1.6); p < 0.0001) and single use reamers (0.1 mm (IQR 0–0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–1.0); p = 0.007). Reaming errors were higher in low-density bone compared to high-density bone, for both reamer types and reaming techniques tested (0.6 mm (IQR 0.3–1.5) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–0.8); p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: We present a novel reamer design that demonstrates superior accuracy to conventional reamers in achieving the desired reaming diameter. Improved reaming accuracy was also demonstrated using both devices and in both bone models, using a ‘whirlwind’ technique. We recommend the use of this novel reamer design employing a ‘whirlwind’ technique to optimize reaming accuracy. Particular attention should be paid toward patients with lower bone quality which may be more susceptible to higher inaccuracies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10408067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104080672023-08-09 Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design Karia, Monil Boughton, Oliver Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu Halewood, Camilla Wozencroft, Rob Clarke, Susannah Cobb, Justin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Successful press-fit implantation relies on an accurately reamed bone cavity. Inaccurate reaming can lead to a suboptimal press-fit risking fracture and cup deformation or excessive micromotion and loosening. Several factors may impact reaming accuracy including the reamer design, the surgeon’s technique and the bone quality. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of reaming techniques and the accuracy of a novel reamer design. METHODS: Eighty composite bone models, half high density and half low density, were reamed with either a conventional or an additively manufactured reamer with a novel design employing either a straight or ‘whirlwind’ reaming technique. Reamed cavities were scanned using a 3D laser scanner and the median difference between achieved and expected diameters compared. RESULTS: The novel reamer design was more accurate than the unused conventional reamer, using both whirlwind (0.1 mm (IQR 0–0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.3–0.4); p < 0.001) and straight techniques (0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–1.0) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1–1.6); p = 0.001). Whirlwind reaming was more accurate than straight reaming using both conventional (0.3 mm (IQR 0.3–0.4) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1–1.6); p < 0.0001) and single use reamers (0.1 mm (IQR 0–0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–1.0); p = 0.007). Reaming errors were higher in low-density bone compared to high-density bone, for both reamer types and reaming techniques tested (0.6 mm (IQR 0.3–1.5) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–0.8); p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: We present a novel reamer design that demonstrates superior accuracy to conventional reamers in achieving the desired reaming diameter. Improved reaming accuracy was also demonstrated using both devices and in both bone models, using a ‘whirlwind’ technique. We recommend the use of this novel reamer design employing a ‘whirlwind’ technique to optimize reaming accuracy. Particular attention should be paid toward patients with lower bone quality which may be more susceptible to higher inaccuracies. BioMed Central 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10408067/ /pubmed/37553588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03888-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Karia, Monil Boughton, Oliver Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu Halewood, Camilla Wozencroft, Rob Clarke, Susannah Cobb, Justin Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design |
title | Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design |
title_full | Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design |
title_fullStr | Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design |
title_short | Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design |
title_sort | enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03888-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kariamonil enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign AT boughtonoliver enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign AT mohansceyonvishnu enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign AT halewoodcamilla enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign AT wozencroftrob enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign AT clarkesusannah enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign AT cobbjustin enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign |