Cargando…

Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design

INTRODUCTION: Successful press-fit implantation relies on an accurately reamed bone cavity. Inaccurate reaming can lead to a suboptimal press-fit risking fracture and cup deformation or excessive micromotion and loosening. Several factors may impact reaming accuracy including the reamer design, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karia, Monil, Boughton, Oliver, Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu, Halewood, Camilla, Wozencroft, Rob, Clarke, Susannah, Cobb, Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03888-1
_version_ 1785086103398645760
author Karia, Monil
Boughton, Oliver
Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu
Halewood, Camilla
Wozencroft, Rob
Clarke, Susannah
Cobb, Justin
author_facet Karia, Monil
Boughton, Oliver
Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu
Halewood, Camilla
Wozencroft, Rob
Clarke, Susannah
Cobb, Justin
author_sort Karia, Monil
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Successful press-fit implantation relies on an accurately reamed bone cavity. Inaccurate reaming can lead to a suboptimal press-fit risking fracture and cup deformation or excessive micromotion and loosening. Several factors may impact reaming accuracy including the reamer design, the surgeon’s technique and the bone quality. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of reaming techniques and the accuracy of a novel reamer design. METHODS: Eighty composite bone models, half high density and half low density, were reamed with either a conventional or an additively manufactured reamer with a novel design employing either a straight or ‘whirlwind’ reaming technique. Reamed cavities were scanned using a 3D laser scanner and the median difference between achieved and expected diameters compared. RESULTS: The novel reamer design was more accurate than the unused conventional reamer, using both whirlwind (0.1 mm (IQR 0–0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.3–0.4); p < 0.001) and straight techniques (0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–1.0) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1–1.6); p = 0.001). Whirlwind reaming was more accurate than straight reaming using both conventional (0.3 mm (IQR 0.3–0.4) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1–1.6); p < 0.0001) and single use reamers (0.1 mm (IQR 0–0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–1.0); p = 0.007). Reaming errors were higher in low-density bone compared to high-density bone, for both reamer types and reaming techniques tested (0.6 mm (IQR 0.3–1.5) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–0.8); p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: We present a novel reamer design that demonstrates superior accuracy to conventional reamers in achieving the desired reaming diameter. Improved reaming accuracy was also demonstrated using both devices and in both bone models, using a ‘whirlwind’ technique. We recommend the use of this novel reamer design employing a ‘whirlwind’ technique to optimize reaming accuracy. Particular attention should be paid toward patients with lower bone quality which may be more susceptible to higher inaccuracies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10408067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104080672023-08-09 Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design Karia, Monil Boughton, Oliver Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu Halewood, Camilla Wozencroft, Rob Clarke, Susannah Cobb, Justin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Successful press-fit implantation relies on an accurately reamed bone cavity. Inaccurate reaming can lead to a suboptimal press-fit risking fracture and cup deformation or excessive micromotion and loosening. Several factors may impact reaming accuracy including the reamer design, the surgeon’s technique and the bone quality. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of reaming techniques and the accuracy of a novel reamer design. METHODS: Eighty composite bone models, half high density and half low density, were reamed with either a conventional or an additively manufactured reamer with a novel design employing either a straight or ‘whirlwind’ reaming technique. Reamed cavities were scanned using a 3D laser scanner and the median difference between achieved and expected diameters compared. RESULTS: The novel reamer design was more accurate than the unused conventional reamer, using both whirlwind (0.1 mm (IQR 0–0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.3–0.4); p < 0.001) and straight techniques (0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–1.0) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1–1.6); p = 0.001). Whirlwind reaming was more accurate than straight reaming using both conventional (0.3 mm (IQR 0.3–0.4) vs. 1.2 mm (IQR 1–1.6); p < 0.0001) and single use reamers (0.1 mm (IQR 0–0.2) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–1.0); p = 0.007). Reaming errors were higher in low-density bone compared to high-density bone, for both reamer types and reaming techniques tested (0.6 mm (IQR 0.3–1.5) vs. 0.3 mm (IQR 0.1–0.8); p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: We present a novel reamer design that demonstrates superior accuracy to conventional reamers in achieving the desired reaming diameter. Improved reaming accuracy was also demonstrated using both devices and in both bone models, using a ‘whirlwind’ technique. We recommend the use of this novel reamer design employing a ‘whirlwind’ technique to optimize reaming accuracy. Particular attention should be paid toward patients with lower bone quality which may be more susceptible to higher inaccuracies. BioMed Central 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10408067/ /pubmed/37553588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03888-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karia, Monil
Boughton, Oliver
Mohan, Sceyon Vishnu
Halewood, Camilla
Wozencroft, Rob
Clarke, Susannah
Cobb, Justin
Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design
title Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design
title_full Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design
title_fullStr Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design
title_short Enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design
title_sort enhancing acetabular reaming accuracy: optimal techniques and a novel reamer design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03888-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kariamonil enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign
AT boughtonoliver enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign
AT mohansceyonvishnu enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign
AT halewoodcamilla enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign
AT wozencroftrob enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign
AT clarkesusannah enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign
AT cobbjustin enhancingacetabularreamingaccuracyoptimaltechniquesandanovelreamerdesign