Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The advantages of parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) over anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. Here, we aim to evaluate their safety and efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes and long-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Kun, Liu, Yin, Hao, Mengdi, Li, Huimin, Liang, Xiaoqing, Yuan, Dajin, Ding, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1
_version_ 1785086141231267840
author Wang, Kun
Liu, Yin
Hao, Mengdi
Li, Huimin
Liang, Xiaoqing
Yuan, Dajin
Ding, Lei
author_facet Wang, Kun
Liu, Yin
Hao, Mengdi
Li, Huimin
Liang, Xiaoqing
Yuan, Dajin
Ding, Lei
author_sort Wang, Kun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The advantages of parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) over anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. Here, we aim to evaluate their safety and efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes for PSR and AR were performed by searching Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were considered eligible (totally 7228 patients: AR, n = 3154 (43.6%) vs. PSR, n = 4074 (56.4%)). Overall survival (OS, HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95-1.22, P = 0.245) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.94-1.28, P = 0.259) were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS, 3-year liver recurrence-free survival (liver-RFS) and 5-year liver-RFS. In terms of perioperative outcome, patients undergoing AR surgery were associated with prolonged operation time (WMD = 51.48 min, 95% CI: 29.03-73.93, P < 0.001), higher amount of blood loss (WMD = 189.92 ml, 95% CI: 21.39-358.45, P = 0.027), increased intraoperative blood transfusion rate (RR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.54-3.26, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (WMD = 1.00 day, 95% CI: 0.34-1.67, P = 0.003), postoperative complications (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.88-2.77, P < 0.001), and 90-day mortality (RR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.88-5.03, P < 0.001). While PSR surgery was associated with positive resection margins (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97, P = 0.024), intrahepatic recurrence (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, P = 0.021) and repeat hepatectomy (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55-0.76, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering relatively acceptable heterogeneity, PSR had better perioperative outcomes without compromising oncological long-term outcomes. However, these findings must be carefully interpreted, requiring more supporting evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023445332. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10408219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104082192023-08-09 Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Kun Liu, Yin Hao, Mengdi Li, Huimin Liang, Xiaoqing Yuan, Dajin Ding, Lei World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: The advantages of parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) over anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. Here, we aim to evaluate their safety and efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes for PSR and AR were performed by searching Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were considered eligible (totally 7228 patients: AR, n = 3154 (43.6%) vs. PSR, n = 4074 (56.4%)). Overall survival (OS, HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95-1.22, P = 0.245) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.94-1.28, P = 0.259) were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS, 3-year liver recurrence-free survival (liver-RFS) and 5-year liver-RFS. In terms of perioperative outcome, patients undergoing AR surgery were associated with prolonged operation time (WMD = 51.48 min, 95% CI: 29.03-73.93, P < 0.001), higher amount of blood loss (WMD = 189.92 ml, 95% CI: 21.39-358.45, P = 0.027), increased intraoperative blood transfusion rate (RR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.54-3.26, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (WMD = 1.00 day, 95% CI: 0.34-1.67, P = 0.003), postoperative complications (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.88-2.77, P < 0.001), and 90-day mortality (RR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.88-5.03, P < 0.001). While PSR surgery was associated with positive resection margins (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97, P = 0.024), intrahepatic recurrence (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, P = 0.021) and repeat hepatectomy (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55-0.76, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering relatively acceptable heterogeneity, PSR had better perioperative outcomes without compromising oncological long-term outcomes. However, these findings must be carefully interpreted, requiring more supporting evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023445332. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1. BioMed Central 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10408219/ /pubmed/37553574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Kun
Liu, Yin
Hao, Mengdi
Li, Huimin
Liang, Xiaoqing
Yuan, Dajin
Ding, Lei
Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wangkun clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyin clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haomengdi clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihuimin clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liangxiaoqing clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuandajin clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dinglei clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis