Cargando…
Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The advantages of parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) over anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. Here, we aim to evaluate their safety and efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes and long-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1 |
_version_ | 1785086141231267840 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Kun Liu, Yin Hao, Mengdi Li, Huimin Liang, Xiaoqing Yuan, Dajin Ding, Lei |
author_facet | Wang, Kun Liu, Yin Hao, Mengdi Li, Huimin Liang, Xiaoqing Yuan, Dajin Ding, Lei |
author_sort | Wang, Kun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The advantages of parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) over anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. Here, we aim to evaluate their safety and efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes for PSR and AR were performed by searching Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were considered eligible (totally 7228 patients: AR, n = 3154 (43.6%) vs. PSR, n = 4074 (56.4%)). Overall survival (OS, HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95-1.22, P = 0.245) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.94-1.28, P = 0.259) were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS, 3-year liver recurrence-free survival (liver-RFS) and 5-year liver-RFS. In terms of perioperative outcome, patients undergoing AR surgery were associated with prolonged operation time (WMD = 51.48 min, 95% CI: 29.03-73.93, P < 0.001), higher amount of blood loss (WMD = 189.92 ml, 95% CI: 21.39-358.45, P = 0.027), increased intraoperative blood transfusion rate (RR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.54-3.26, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (WMD = 1.00 day, 95% CI: 0.34-1.67, P = 0.003), postoperative complications (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.88-2.77, P < 0.001), and 90-day mortality (RR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.88-5.03, P < 0.001). While PSR surgery was associated with positive resection margins (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97, P = 0.024), intrahepatic recurrence (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, P = 0.021) and repeat hepatectomy (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55-0.76, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering relatively acceptable heterogeneity, PSR had better perioperative outcomes without compromising oncological long-term outcomes. However, these findings must be carefully interpreted, requiring more supporting evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023445332. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10408219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104082192023-08-09 Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Kun Liu, Yin Hao, Mengdi Li, Huimin Liang, Xiaoqing Yuan, Dajin Ding, Lei World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: The advantages of parenchymal-sparing resection (PSR) over anatomic resection (AR) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial. Here, we aim to evaluate their safety and efficacy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes for PSR and AR were performed by searching Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were considered eligible (totally 7228 patients: AR, n = 3154 (43.6%) vs. PSR, n = 4074 (56.4%)). Overall survival (OS, HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95-1.22, P = 0.245) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.94-1.28, P = 0.259) were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS, 3-year liver recurrence-free survival (liver-RFS) and 5-year liver-RFS. In terms of perioperative outcome, patients undergoing AR surgery were associated with prolonged operation time (WMD = 51.48 min, 95% CI: 29.03-73.93, P < 0.001), higher amount of blood loss (WMD = 189.92 ml, 95% CI: 21.39-358.45, P = 0.027), increased intraoperative blood transfusion rate (RR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.54-3.26, P < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (WMD = 1.00 day, 95% CI: 0.34-1.67, P = 0.003), postoperative complications (RR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.88-2.77, P < 0.001), and 90-day mortality (RR = 3.08, 95% CI: 1.88-5.03, P < 0.001). While PSR surgery was associated with positive resection margins (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97, P = 0.024), intrahepatic recurrence (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, P = 0.021) and repeat hepatectomy (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55-0.76, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering relatively acceptable heterogeneity, PSR had better perioperative outcomes without compromising oncological long-term outcomes. However, these findings must be carefully interpreted, requiring more supporting evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023445332. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1. BioMed Central 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10408219/ /pubmed/37553574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Wang, Kun Liu, Yin Hao, Mengdi Li, Huimin Liang, Xiaoqing Yuan, Dajin Ding, Lei Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03127-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangkun clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuyin clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haomengdi clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lihuimin clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liangxiaoqing clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuandajin clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dinglei clinicaloutcomesofparenchymalsparingversusanatomicresectionforcolorectallivermetastasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |