Cargando…

Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Non-Critically Ill Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The prevalence of venous thromboembolism is high in patients with COVID-19, despite prophylactic anticoagulation. The evidence that supports the preferred thromboprophylaxis regimen in non-critically ill patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 is still limited. Therefore, this systematic review and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hafiz, Awatif, Alkofide, Hadeel, Al Sulaiman, Khalid, Joharji, Hala, Aljohani, Sarah, Sarkhi, Khadijah A., Alharbi, Reem, Korayem, Ghazwa B., AlFaifi, Mashael, Alsohimi, Samiah, Aljuhani, Ohoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231191123
_version_ 1785086160993779712
author Hafiz, Awatif
Alkofide, Hadeel
Al Sulaiman, Khalid
Joharji, Hala
Aljohani, Sarah
Sarkhi, Khadijah A.
Alharbi, Reem
Korayem, Ghazwa B.
AlFaifi, Mashael
Alsohimi, Samiah
Aljuhani, Ohoud
author_facet Hafiz, Awatif
Alkofide, Hadeel
Al Sulaiman, Khalid
Joharji, Hala
Aljohani, Sarah
Sarkhi, Khadijah A.
Alharbi, Reem
Korayem, Ghazwa B.
AlFaifi, Mashael
Alsohimi, Samiah
Aljuhani, Ohoud
author_sort Hafiz, Awatif
collection PubMed
description The prevalence of venous thromboembolism is high in patients with COVID-19, despite prophylactic anticoagulation. The evidence that supports the preferred thromboprophylaxis regimen in non-critically ill patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 is still limited. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received standard thromboprophylaxis anticoagulation with intermediate to high prophylaxis regimens. We systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase databases for published studies until August 17th, 2022. We included studies on patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received thromboprophylaxis during their hospital stay. Patients who received standard prophylaxis dose “control group” were compared to patients who received intermediate to high prophylaxis “intervention group”. Random effect models were used when pooling crude numbers and adjusted effect estimates of study outcomes. A comprehensive analysis was conducted, encompassing seven studies involving a total of 1931 patients. The risk of all-cause thrombosis was not statistically different between the two groups (risk ratio [RR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.11, 20.21]). The risk of minor bleeding was reported to be lower in patients who received intermediate to high prophylaxis (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.21, 1.97), while had a higher risk of major bleeding compared with the standard prophylaxis (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.43, 4.61); however, did not reach the statistical significance. The overall risk for all hospital mortality favored the utilization of intermediate to high doses over the standard thromboprophylaxis dosing (RR 0.47, 95%CI 0.29, 0.75). In medically ill patients with COVID-19, there is no difference between standard and intermediate to high prophylaxis dosing regarding thrombosis and bleeding. However, it appears that intermediate to high prophylaxis regimens are linked to additional survival benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10408323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104083232023-08-09 Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Non-Critically Ill Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hafiz, Awatif Alkofide, Hadeel Al Sulaiman, Khalid Joharji, Hala Aljohani, Sarah Sarkhi, Khadijah A. Alharbi, Reem Korayem, Ghazwa B. AlFaifi, Mashael Alsohimi, Samiah Aljuhani, Ohoud Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Article The prevalence of venous thromboembolism is high in patients with COVID-19, despite prophylactic anticoagulation. The evidence that supports the preferred thromboprophylaxis regimen in non-critically ill patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 is still limited. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received standard thromboprophylaxis anticoagulation with intermediate to high prophylaxis regimens. We systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase databases for published studies until August 17th, 2022. We included studies on patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received thromboprophylaxis during their hospital stay. Patients who received standard prophylaxis dose “control group” were compared to patients who received intermediate to high prophylaxis “intervention group”. Random effect models were used when pooling crude numbers and adjusted effect estimates of study outcomes. A comprehensive analysis was conducted, encompassing seven studies involving a total of 1931 patients. The risk of all-cause thrombosis was not statistically different between the two groups (risk ratio [RR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.11, 20.21]). The risk of minor bleeding was reported to be lower in patients who received intermediate to high prophylaxis (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.21, 1.97), while had a higher risk of major bleeding compared with the standard prophylaxis (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.43, 4.61); however, did not reach the statistical significance. The overall risk for all hospital mortality favored the utilization of intermediate to high doses over the standard thromboprophylaxis dosing (RR 0.47, 95%CI 0.29, 0.75). In medically ill patients with COVID-19, there is no difference between standard and intermediate to high prophylaxis dosing regarding thrombosis and bleeding. However, it appears that intermediate to high prophylaxis regimens are linked to additional survival benefits. SAGE Publications 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10408323/ /pubmed/37547931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231191123 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hafiz, Awatif
Alkofide, Hadeel
Al Sulaiman, Khalid
Joharji, Hala
Aljohani, Sarah
Sarkhi, Khadijah A.
Alharbi, Reem
Korayem, Ghazwa B.
AlFaifi, Mashael
Alsohimi, Samiah
Aljuhani, Ohoud
Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Non-Critically Ill Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Non-Critically Ill Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Non-Critically Ill Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Non-Critically Ill Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Non-Critically Ill Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Non-Critically Ill Patients With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized non-critically ill patients with mild-to-moderate covid-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231191123
work_keys_str_mv AT hafizawatif thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alkofidehadeel thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alsulaimankhalid thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT joharjihala thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aljohanisarah thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sarkhikhadijaha thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alharbireem thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT korayemghazwab thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alfaifimashael thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alsohimisamiah thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aljuhaniohoud thromboprophylaxisinhospitalizednoncriticallyillpatientswithmildtomoderatecovid19infectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis