Cargando…

Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) have been developed for a better understanding of patient needs. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is an internationally recommended PROM in palliative care. The validated electronic version of IPOS (eIPOS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burner-Fritsch, Isabel, Kolmhuber, Stefanie, Hodiamont, Farina, Bausewein, Claudia, Hriskova, Katerina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231186827
_version_ 1785086163216760832
author Burner-Fritsch, Isabel
Kolmhuber, Stefanie
Hodiamont, Farina
Bausewein, Claudia
Hriskova, Katerina
author_facet Burner-Fritsch, Isabel
Kolmhuber, Stefanie
Hodiamont, Farina
Bausewein, Claudia
Hriskova, Katerina
author_sort Burner-Fritsch, Isabel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) have been developed for a better understanding of patient needs. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is an internationally recommended PROM in palliative care. The validated electronic version of IPOS (eIPOS) was implemented in four German specialist palliative home care (SPHC) teams for use in everyday clinical practice. Patients reported symptoms and concerns via eIPOS, which were transmitted directly to the electronic patient record of the respective SPHC team. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to describe and explore the health care professionals’ (HCPs’) experiences regarding acceptance and use of eIPOS in clinical practice in SPHC. DESIGN: The mixed-methods sequential explanatory design comprised an anonymized quantitative online survey followed by qualitative focus groups. METHODS: The online survey asked in both closed and open questions for HCP’s experience with eIPOS. Ambiguous results from the survey were discussed in two focus groups. Survey data were analysed with descriptive and univariable statistics, and the framework approach was used for qualitative data. In a further step, we conducted integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative results using joint displays. RESULTS: All HCPs of the four SPHC teams (n = 52) were invited to participate. HCPs participating in the survey (n = 32) and the focus groups (n = 7) saw potentials for implementing ePROM in palliative home care – as far as it is technically easy to handle and can be easily integrated into clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Successful use of ePROMs is affected by the possibility of easy integration into the teams’ different structures and processes and the HCPs’ perceptions of potentials regarding ePROM use in SPHC. REGISTRATION: The study is registered on clinicaltrials.org (NCT03879668).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10408331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104083312023-08-09 Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study Burner-Fritsch, Isabel Kolmhuber, Stefanie Hodiamont, Farina Bausewein, Claudia Hriskova, Katerina Palliat Care Soc Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) have been developed for a better understanding of patient needs. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is an internationally recommended PROM in palliative care. The validated electronic version of IPOS (eIPOS) was implemented in four German specialist palliative home care (SPHC) teams for use in everyday clinical practice. Patients reported symptoms and concerns via eIPOS, which were transmitted directly to the electronic patient record of the respective SPHC team. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to describe and explore the health care professionals’ (HCPs’) experiences regarding acceptance and use of eIPOS in clinical practice in SPHC. DESIGN: The mixed-methods sequential explanatory design comprised an anonymized quantitative online survey followed by qualitative focus groups. METHODS: The online survey asked in both closed and open questions for HCP’s experience with eIPOS. Ambiguous results from the survey were discussed in two focus groups. Survey data were analysed with descriptive and univariable statistics, and the framework approach was used for qualitative data. In a further step, we conducted integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative results using joint displays. RESULTS: All HCPs of the four SPHC teams (n = 52) were invited to participate. HCPs participating in the survey (n = 32) and the focus groups (n = 7) saw potentials for implementing ePROM in palliative home care – as far as it is technically easy to handle and can be easily integrated into clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Successful use of ePROMs is affected by the possibility of easy integration into the teams’ different structures and processes and the HCPs’ perceptions of potentials regarding ePROM use in SPHC. REGISTRATION: The study is registered on clinicaltrials.org (NCT03879668). SAGE Publications 2023-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10408331/ /pubmed/37560175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231186827 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Burner-Fritsch, Isabel
Kolmhuber, Stefanie
Hodiamont, Farina
Bausewein, Claudia
Hriskova, Katerina
Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study
title Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study
title_full Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study
title_short Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study
title_sort implementing eprom in specialist palliative home care: the professionals’ perspective – a mixed-methods study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231186827
work_keys_str_mv AT burnerfritschisabel implementingeprominspecialistpalliativehomecaretheprofessionalsperspectiveamixedmethodsstudy
AT kolmhuberstefanie implementingeprominspecialistpalliativehomecaretheprofessionalsperspectiveamixedmethodsstudy
AT hodiamontfarina implementingeprominspecialistpalliativehomecaretheprofessionalsperspectiveamixedmethodsstudy
AT bauseweinclaudia implementingeprominspecialistpalliativehomecaretheprofessionalsperspectiveamixedmethodsstudy
AT hriskovakaterina implementingeprominspecialistpalliativehomecaretheprofessionalsperspectiveamixedmethodsstudy