Cargando…
Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy is a reliable endoscopic technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. However, UBE discectomy involves a single-handed manipulation, which may compromise the utility of the procedure. The present study was performed to examine the e...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37548213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231164006 |
_version_ | 1785086167341858816 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Xiaozhou |
author_facet | Jiang, Xiaozhou |
author_sort | Jiang, Xiaozhou |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy is a reliable endoscopic technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. However, UBE discectomy involves a single-handed manipulation, which may compromise the utility of the procedure. The present study was performed to examine the efficacy and safety of a novel pin-assisted retraction technique. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study involved 57 consecutive patients who underwent UBE lumbar discectomy from July 2021 to May 2022. The patients were randomly divided into the pin-assisted UBE discectomy group (P-UBE group) and the traditional UBE discectomy group (T-UBE group). The patients’ perioperative data, clinical outcomes, and radiologic outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, endoscopic irrigation volume, and overall complication rate were significantly lower in the P-UBE group than in the T-UBE group. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcome data between the two groups. CONCLUSION: P-UBE discectomy may have superior safety and efficacy over the traditional technique, and it has the potential to serve as an optional method in UBE lumbar surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10408347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104083472023-08-09 Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study Jiang, Xiaozhou J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy is a reliable endoscopic technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. However, UBE discectomy involves a single-handed manipulation, which may compromise the utility of the procedure. The present study was performed to examine the efficacy and safety of a novel pin-assisted retraction technique. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study involved 57 consecutive patients who underwent UBE lumbar discectomy from July 2021 to May 2022. The patients were randomly divided into the pin-assisted UBE discectomy group (P-UBE group) and the traditional UBE discectomy group (T-UBE group). The patients’ perioperative data, clinical outcomes, and radiologic outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, endoscopic irrigation volume, and overall complication rate were significantly lower in the P-UBE group than in the T-UBE group. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcome data between the two groups. CONCLUSION: P-UBE discectomy may have superior safety and efficacy over the traditional technique, and it has the potential to serve as an optional method in UBE lumbar surgery. SAGE Publications 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10408347/ /pubmed/37548213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231164006 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Clinical Research Report Jiang, Xiaozhou Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | pin-assisted retraction technique in unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Retrospective Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37548213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231164006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangxiaozhou pinassistedretractiontechniqueinunilateralbiportalendoscopicdiscectomyaretrospectivecohortstudy |