Cargando…

Spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: A case report

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves the utilization of an implantable neurostimulation device, stereotypically used in the treatment of patients with chronic neuropathic pain. While these devices have been shown to have significant clinical benefits, there have also been documented po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manjunath, Anusha, Goel, Chirag, Baskaran, Archit Bharathwaj, Kozel, Olivia A., Gibson, William, Jones, Michael, Rosenow, Joshua M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560564
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_1133_2022
_version_ 1785086206908825600
author Manjunath, Anusha
Goel, Chirag
Baskaran, Archit Bharathwaj
Kozel, Olivia A.
Gibson, William
Jones, Michael
Rosenow, Joshua M.
author_facet Manjunath, Anusha
Goel, Chirag
Baskaran, Archit Bharathwaj
Kozel, Olivia A.
Gibson, William
Jones, Michael
Rosenow, Joshua M.
author_sort Manjunath, Anusha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves the utilization of an implantable neurostimulation device, stereotypically used in the treatment of patients with chronic neuropathic pain. While these devices have been shown to have significant clinical benefits, there have also been documented potential complications, including the risk of infection, fractured electrodes, electrode migration, and lack of symptom improvement. In addition, there has been minimal documentation on gastrointestinal (GI) side effects after SCS implantation. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 42-year-old patient with chronic axial and radicular neuropathic pain in her back and left leg status post multiple lumbar surgeries underwent implantation of an open paddle lead in the T8–T9 region. After the procedure, the patient endorsed a 50% decrease in pain at the 6-week follow-up with no further concerns. However, at the 18 months follow-up, the patient endorsed severe constipation when the SCS was turned on, leading to subsequent evaluation by gastroenterology, motility studies, and a thorough bowel regimen. Symptoms persisted, and the patient ultimately opted for the removal of the SCS implant at 21 months after the initial surgery. CONCLUSION: While the exact mechanism behind the GI side effects endorsed in this patient is unknown, current literature postulates a variety of theories, including a SCS-induced parasympathetic blockade of the GI tract. Further, investigation is needed to determine the exact effects of SCS on the GI tract.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10408636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104086362023-08-09 Spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: A case report Manjunath, Anusha Goel, Chirag Baskaran, Archit Bharathwaj Kozel, Olivia A. Gibson, William Jones, Michael Rosenow, Joshua M. Surg Neurol Int Case Report BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves the utilization of an implantable neurostimulation device, stereotypically used in the treatment of patients with chronic neuropathic pain. While these devices have been shown to have significant clinical benefits, there have also been documented potential complications, including the risk of infection, fractured electrodes, electrode migration, and lack of symptom improvement. In addition, there has been minimal documentation on gastrointestinal (GI) side effects after SCS implantation. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 42-year-old patient with chronic axial and radicular neuropathic pain in her back and left leg status post multiple lumbar surgeries underwent implantation of an open paddle lead in the T8–T9 region. After the procedure, the patient endorsed a 50% decrease in pain at the 6-week follow-up with no further concerns. However, at the 18 months follow-up, the patient endorsed severe constipation when the SCS was turned on, leading to subsequent evaluation by gastroenterology, motility studies, and a thorough bowel regimen. Symptoms persisted, and the patient ultimately opted for the removal of the SCS implant at 21 months after the initial surgery. CONCLUSION: While the exact mechanism behind the GI side effects endorsed in this patient is unknown, current literature postulates a variety of theories, including a SCS-induced parasympathetic blockade of the GI tract. Further, investigation is needed to determine the exact effects of SCS on the GI tract. Scientific Scholar 2023-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10408636/ /pubmed/37560564 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_1133_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Case Report
Manjunath, Anusha
Goel, Chirag
Baskaran, Archit Bharathwaj
Kozel, Olivia A.
Gibson, William
Jones, Michael
Rosenow, Joshua M.
Spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: A case report
title Spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: A case report
title_full Spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: A case report
title_fullStr Spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: A case report
title_short Spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: A case report
title_sort spinal cord stimulation-induced gastroparesis: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560564
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_1133_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT manjunathanusha spinalcordstimulationinducedgastroparesisacasereport
AT goelchirag spinalcordstimulationinducedgastroparesisacasereport
AT baskaranarchitbharathwaj spinalcordstimulationinducedgastroparesisacasereport
AT kozeloliviaa spinalcordstimulationinducedgastroparesisacasereport
AT gibsonwilliam spinalcordstimulationinducedgastroparesisacasereport
AT jonesmichael spinalcordstimulationinducedgastroparesisacasereport
AT rosenowjoshuam spinalcordstimulationinducedgastroparesisacasereport