Cargando…
The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review
Auto-injectors are medical devices designed for the self-administration of injections by patients and for easy administration by healthcare professionals in emergency situations. Although they vary in design and application, auto-injectors are typically built around a spring-loaded syringe. Despite...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559861 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41601 |
_version_ | 1785086258441093120 |
---|---|
author | Dostal, Petr Taubel, Jorg Lorch, Ulrike Aggarwal, Vishal York, Thomas |
author_facet | Dostal, Petr Taubel, Jorg Lorch, Ulrike Aggarwal, Vishal York, Thomas |
author_sort | Dostal, Petr |
collection | PubMed |
description | Auto-injectors are medical devices designed for the self-administration of injections by patients and for easy administration by healthcare professionals in emergency situations. Although they vary in design and application, auto-injectors are typically built around a spring-loaded syringe. Despite their widespread use in a variety of clinical settings, there have been limited attempts to assess their reliability. This systematic review investigates the reliability of auto-injectors, identifies common causes of failure, and summarizes the overall rate of malfunction. A systematic review of research published on the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2022. The relevant studies were assessed for their methodological quality and risk of bias prior to extracting key study outcomes on auto-injector reliability. Finally, a summary rate covering all eligible studies was calculated. The search identified a total of 110 articles, of which ten were found to be suitable for inclusion. The risk of bias was low, and the methodological quality was high across the ten studies. Out of a total of 2,964 injections administered from an auto-injector, there were 12 device malfunctions, giving a summary rate of 0.40% (±0.23) auto-injector failures. The causes of malfunction varied in nature, with the majority of cases (58.3%) not being specified or not identified. This review has demonstrated that auto-injectors are reliable devices. Although further research on the nature of malfunctions is needed, the low rate of malfunctions supports training programs for healthcare professionals and patients on the optimum use and maintenance of auto-injectors. It provides a rationale for their continued development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10409493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104094932023-08-09 The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review Dostal, Petr Taubel, Jorg Lorch, Ulrike Aggarwal, Vishal York, Thomas Cureus Quality Improvement Auto-injectors are medical devices designed for the self-administration of injections by patients and for easy administration by healthcare professionals in emergency situations. Although they vary in design and application, auto-injectors are typically built around a spring-loaded syringe. Despite their widespread use in a variety of clinical settings, there have been limited attempts to assess their reliability. This systematic review investigates the reliability of auto-injectors, identifies common causes of failure, and summarizes the overall rate of malfunction. A systematic review of research published on the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was performed in July 2022. The relevant studies were assessed for their methodological quality and risk of bias prior to extracting key study outcomes on auto-injector reliability. Finally, a summary rate covering all eligible studies was calculated. The search identified a total of 110 articles, of which ten were found to be suitable for inclusion. The risk of bias was low, and the methodological quality was high across the ten studies. Out of a total of 2,964 injections administered from an auto-injector, there were 12 device malfunctions, giving a summary rate of 0.40% (±0.23) auto-injector failures. The causes of malfunction varied in nature, with the majority of cases (58.3%) not being specified or not identified. This review has demonstrated that auto-injectors are reliable devices. Although further research on the nature of malfunctions is needed, the low rate of malfunctions supports training programs for healthcare professionals and patients on the optimum use and maintenance of auto-injectors. It provides a rationale for their continued development. Cureus 2023-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10409493/ /pubmed/37559861 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41601 Text en Copyright © 2023, Dostal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Dostal, Petr Taubel, Jorg Lorch, Ulrike Aggarwal, Vishal York, Thomas The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review |
title | The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Reliability of Auto-Injectors in Clinical Use: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | reliability of auto-injectors in clinical use: a systematic review |
topic | Quality Improvement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559861 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dostalpetr thereliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT taubeljorg thereliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT lorchulrike thereliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT aggarwalvishal thereliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT yorkthomas thereliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT dostalpetr reliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT taubeljorg reliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT lorchulrike reliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT aggarwalvishal reliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview AT yorkthomas reliabilityofautoinjectorsinclinicaluseasystematicreview |