Cargando…

Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique

SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation damage studies are used to optimize radiotherapy treatment techniques. Although biological indicators of damage are the best assays of effect, they are highly variable due to biological heterogeneity. The free radical radiochemistry can be assayed with optical reporters, allo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sunnerberg, Jacob, Thomas, William S., Petusseau, Arthur, Reed, Matthew S., Jack Hoopes, P., Pogue, Brian W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.8.080901
_version_ 1785086260775223296
author Sunnerberg, Jacob
Thomas, William S.
Petusseau, Arthur
Reed, Matthew S.
Jack Hoopes, P.
Pogue, Brian W.
author_facet Sunnerberg, Jacob
Thomas, William S.
Petusseau, Arthur
Reed, Matthew S.
Jack Hoopes, P.
Pogue, Brian W.
author_sort Sunnerberg, Jacob
collection PubMed
description SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation damage studies are used to optimize radiotherapy treatment techniques. Although biological indicators of damage are the best assays of effect, they are highly variable due to biological heterogeneity. The free radical radiochemistry can be assayed with optical reporters, allowing for high precision titration of techniques. AIM: We examine the optical reporters of radiochemistry to highlight those with the best potential for translational use in vivo, as surrogates for biological damage assays, to inform on mechanisms. APPROACH: A survey of the radical chemistry effects from reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxygen itself was completed to link to DNA or biological damage. Optical reporters of ROS include fluorescent, phosphorescent, and bioluminescent molecules that have a variety of activation pathways, and each was reviewed for its in vivo translation potential. RESULTS: There are molecular reporters of ROS having potential to report within living systems, including derivatives of luminol, 2′7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate, Amplex Red, and fluorescein. None have unique specificity to singular ROS species. Macromolecular engineered reporters unique to specific ROS are emerging. The ability to directly measure oxygen via reporters, such as Oxyphor and protoporphyrin IX, is an opportunity to quantify the consumption of oxygen during ROS generation, and this translates from in vitro to in vivo use. Emerging techniques, such as ion particle beams, spatial fractionation, and ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy, provide the motivation for these studies. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo optical reporters of radiochemistry are quantitatively useful for comparing radiotherapy techniques, although their use comes at the cost of the unknown connection to the mechanisms of radiobiological damage. Still their lower measurement uncertainty, compared with biological response assay, makes them an invaluable tool. Linkage to DNA damage and biological damage is needed, and measures such as oxygen consumption serve as useful surrogate measures that translate to in vivo use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10409499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104094992023-08-09 Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique Sunnerberg, Jacob Thomas, William S. Petusseau, Arthur Reed, Matthew S. Jack Hoopes, P. Pogue, Brian W. J Biomed Opt Review Papers SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation damage studies are used to optimize radiotherapy treatment techniques. Although biological indicators of damage are the best assays of effect, they are highly variable due to biological heterogeneity. The free radical radiochemistry can be assayed with optical reporters, allowing for high precision titration of techniques. AIM: We examine the optical reporters of radiochemistry to highlight those with the best potential for translational use in vivo, as surrogates for biological damage assays, to inform on mechanisms. APPROACH: A survey of the radical chemistry effects from reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxygen itself was completed to link to DNA or biological damage. Optical reporters of ROS include fluorescent, phosphorescent, and bioluminescent molecules that have a variety of activation pathways, and each was reviewed for its in vivo translation potential. RESULTS: There are molecular reporters of ROS having potential to report within living systems, including derivatives of luminol, 2′7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate, Amplex Red, and fluorescein. None have unique specificity to singular ROS species. Macromolecular engineered reporters unique to specific ROS are emerging. The ability to directly measure oxygen via reporters, such as Oxyphor and protoporphyrin IX, is an opportunity to quantify the consumption of oxygen during ROS generation, and this translates from in vitro to in vivo use. Emerging techniques, such as ion particle beams, spatial fractionation, and ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy, provide the motivation for these studies. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo optical reporters of radiochemistry are quantitatively useful for comparing radiotherapy techniques, although their use comes at the cost of the unknown connection to the mechanisms of radiobiological damage. Still their lower measurement uncertainty, compared with biological response assay, makes them an invaluable tool. Linkage to DNA damage and biological damage is needed, and measures such as oxygen consumption serve as useful surrogate measures that translate to in vivo use. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2023-08-08 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10409499/ /pubmed/37560327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.8.080901 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Review Papers
Sunnerberg, Jacob
Thomas, William S.
Petusseau, Arthur
Reed, Matthew S.
Jack Hoopes, P.
Pogue, Brian W.
Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique
title Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique
title_full Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique
title_fullStr Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique
title_full_unstemmed Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique
title_short Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique
title_sort review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique
topic Review Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.8.080901
work_keys_str_mv AT sunnerbergjacob reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique
AT thomaswilliams reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique
AT petusseauarthur reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique
AT reedmatthews reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique
AT jackhoopesp reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique
AT poguebrianw reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique