Cargando…
Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique
SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation damage studies are used to optimize radiotherapy treatment techniques. Although biological indicators of damage are the best assays of effect, they are highly variable due to biological heterogeneity. The free radical radiochemistry can be assayed with optical reporters, allo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.8.080901 |
_version_ | 1785086260775223296 |
---|---|
author | Sunnerberg, Jacob Thomas, William S. Petusseau, Arthur Reed, Matthew S. Jack Hoopes, P. Pogue, Brian W. |
author_facet | Sunnerberg, Jacob Thomas, William S. Petusseau, Arthur Reed, Matthew S. Jack Hoopes, P. Pogue, Brian W. |
author_sort | Sunnerberg, Jacob |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation damage studies are used to optimize radiotherapy treatment techniques. Although biological indicators of damage are the best assays of effect, they are highly variable due to biological heterogeneity. The free radical radiochemistry can be assayed with optical reporters, allowing for high precision titration of techniques. AIM: We examine the optical reporters of radiochemistry to highlight those with the best potential for translational use in vivo, as surrogates for biological damage assays, to inform on mechanisms. APPROACH: A survey of the radical chemistry effects from reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxygen itself was completed to link to DNA or biological damage. Optical reporters of ROS include fluorescent, phosphorescent, and bioluminescent molecules that have a variety of activation pathways, and each was reviewed for its in vivo translation potential. RESULTS: There are molecular reporters of ROS having potential to report within living systems, including derivatives of luminol, 2′7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate, Amplex Red, and fluorescein. None have unique specificity to singular ROS species. Macromolecular engineered reporters unique to specific ROS are emerging. The ability to directly measure oxygen via reporters, such as Oxyphor and protoporphyrin IX, is an opportunity to quantify the consumption of oxygen during ROS generation, and this translates from in vitro to in vivo use. Emerging techniques, such as ion particle beams, spatial fractionation, and ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy, provide the motivation for these studies. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo optical reporters of radiochemistry are quantitatively useful for comparing radiotherapy techniques, although their use comes at the cost of the unknown connection to the mechanisms of radiobiological damage. Still their lower measurement uncertainty, compared with biological response assay, makes them an invaluable tool. Linkage to DNA damage and biological damage is needed, and measures such as oxygen consumption serve as useful surrogate measures that translate to in vivo use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10409499 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104094992023-08-09 Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique Sunnerberg, Jacob Thomas, William S. Petusseau, Arthur Reed, Matthew S. Jack Hoopes, P. Pogue, Brian W. J Biomed Opt Review Papers SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation damage studies are used to optimize radiotherapy treatment techniques. Although biological indicators of damage are the best assays of effect, they are highly variable due to biological heterogeneity. The free radical radiochemistry can be assayed with optical reporters, allowing for high precision titration of techniques. AIM: We examine the optical reporters of radiochemistry to highlight those with the best potential for translational use in vivo, as surrogates for biological damage assays, to inform on mechanisms. APPROACH: A survey of the radical chemistry effects from reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxygen itself was completed to link to DNA or biological damage. Optical reporters of ROS include fluorescent, phosphorescent, and bioluminescent molecules that have a variety of activation pathways, and each was reviewed for its in vivo translation potential. RESULTS: There are molecular reporters of ROS having potential to report within living systems, including derivatives of luminol, 2′7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate, Amplex Red, and fluorescein. None have unique specificity to singular ROS species. Macromolecular engineered reporters unique to specific ROS are emerging. The ability to directly measure oxygen via reporters, such as Oxyphor and protoporphyrin IX, is an opportunity to quantify the consumption of oxygen during ROS generation, and this translates from in vitro to in vivo use. Emerging techniques, such as ion particle beams, spatial fractionation, and ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy, provide the motivation for these studies. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo optical reporters of radiochemistry are quantitatively useful for comparing radiotherapy techniques, although their use comes at the cost of the unknown connection to the mechanisms of radiobiological damage. Still their lower measurement uncertainty, compared with biological response assay, makes them an invaluable tool. Linkage to DNA damage and biological damage is needed, and measures such as oxygen consumption serve as useful surrogate measures that translate to in vivo use. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2023-08-08 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10409499/ /pubmed/37560327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.8.080901 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Review Papers Sunnerberg, Jacob Thomas, William S. Petusseau, Arthur Reed, Matthew S. Jack Hoopes, P. Pogue, Brian W. Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique |
title | Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique |
title_full | Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique |
title_fullStr | Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique |
title_short | Review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique |
title_sort | review of optical reporters of radiation effects in vivo: tools to quantify improvements in radiation delivery technique |
topic | Review Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.8.080901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunnerbergjacob reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique AT thomaswilliams reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique AT petusseauarthur reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique AT reedmatthews reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique AT jackhoopesp reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique AT poguebrianw reviewofopticalreportersofradiationeffectsinvivotoolstoquantifyimprovementsinradiationdeliverytechnique |