Cargando…
Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting
BACKGROUND: Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37340200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13460-0 |
_version_ | 1785086326404546560 |
---|---|
author | Sluckin, Tania C. Hazen, Sanne-Marije J. A. Horsthuis, Karin Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. Aalbers, Arend G. J. Beets, Geerard L. Boerma, Evert-Jan G. Borstlap, Jaap van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian Burger, Jacobus W. A. Crolla, Rogier M. P. H. Daniëls-Gooszen, Alette W. Davids, Paul H. P. Dunker, Michalda S. Fabry, Hans F. J. Furnée, Edgar J. B. van Gils, Renza A. H. de Haas, Robbert J. Hoogendoorn, Stefan van Koeverden, Sebastiaan de Korte, Fleur I. Oosterling, Steven J. Peeters, Koen C. M. J. Posma, Lisanne A. E. Pultrum, Bareld B. Rothbarth, Joost Rutten, Harm J. T. Schasfoort, Renske A. Schreurs, Wilhelmina H. Simons, Petra C. G. Smits, Anke B. Talsma, Aaldert K. The, G. Y. Mireille van Tilborg, Fiek Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Vanhooymissen, Inge J. S. van de Ven, Anthony W. H. Verdaasdonk, Emiel G. G. Vermaas, Maarten Vliegen, Roy F. A. Vogelaar, F. Jeroen de Vries, Marianne Vroemen, Joy C. van Vugt, Sebastiaan T. Westerterp, Marinke van Westreenen, Henderik L. de Wilt, Johannes H. W. van der Zaag, Edwin S. Zimmerman, David D. E. Marijnen, Corrie A. M. Tanis, Pieter J. Kusters, Miranda |
author_facet | Sluckin, Tania C. Hazen, Sanne-Marije J. A. Horsthuis, Karin Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. Aalbers, Arend G. J. Beets, Geerard L. Boerma, Evert-Jan G. Borstlap, Jaap van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian Burger, Jacobus W. A. Crolla, Rogier M. P. H. Daniëls-Gooszen, Alette W. Davids, Paul H. P. Dunker, Michalda S. Fabry, Hans F. J. Furnée, Edgar J. B. van Gils, Renza A. H. de Haas, Robbert J. Hoogendoorn, Stefan van Koeverden, Sebastiaan de Korte, Fleur I. Oosterling, Steven J. Peeters, Koen C. M. J. Posma, Lisanne A. E. Pultrum, Bareld B. Rothbarth, Joost Rutten, Harm J. T. Schasfoort, Renske A. Schreurs, Wilhelmina H. Simons, Petra C. G. Smits, Anke B. Talsma, Aaldert K. The, G. Y. Mireille van Tilborg, Fiek Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Vanhooymissen, Inge J. S. van de Ven, Anthony W. H. Verdaasdonk, Emiel G. G. Vermaas, Maarten Vliegen, Roy F. A. Vogelaar, F. Jeroen de Vries, Marianne Vroemen, Joy C. van Vugt, Sebastiaan T. Westerterp, Marinke van Westreenen, Henderik L. de Wilt, Johannes H. W. van der Zaag, Edwin S. Zimmerman, David D. E. Marijnen, Corrie A. M. Tanis, Pieter J. Kusters, Miranda |
author_sort | Sluckin, Tania C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level. METHODS: Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either ‘node-picking’ (the removal of an individual LLN) or ‘partial regional node dissection’ (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (≥7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection. RESULTS: Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2–2.5, p = 0.874). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10409808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104098082023-08-10 Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting Sluckin, Tania C. Hazen, Sanne-Marije J. A. Horsthuis, Karin Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. Aalbers, Arend G. J. Beets, Geerard L. Boerma, Evert-Jan G. Borstlap, Jaap van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian Burger, Jacobus W. A. Crolla, Rogier M. P. H. Daniëls-Gooszen, Alette W. Davids, Paul H. P. Dunker, Michalda S. Fabry, Hans F. J. Furnée, Edgar J. B. van Gils, Renza A. H. de Haas, Robbert J. Hoogendoorn, Stefan van Koeverden, Sebastiaan de Korte, Fleur I. Oosterling, Steven J. Peeters, Koen C. M. J. Posma, Lisanne A. E. Pultrum, Bareld B. Rothbarth, Joost Rutten, Harm J. T. Schasfoort, Renske A. Schreurs, Wilhelmina H. Simons, Petra C. G. Smits, Anke B. Talsma, Aaldert K. The, G. Y. Mireille van Tilborg, Fiek Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Vanhooymissen, Inge J. S. van de Ven, Anthony W. H. Verdaasdonk, Emiel G. G. Vermaas, Maarten Vliegen, Roy F. A. Vogelaar, F. Jeroen de Vries, Marianne Vroemen, Joy C. van Vugt, Sebastiaan T. Westerterp, Marinke van Westreenen, Henderik L. de Wilt, Johannes H. W. van der Zaag, Edwin S. Zimmerman, David D. E. Marijnen, Corrie A. M. Tanis, Pieter J. Kusters, Miranda Ann Surg Oncol Colorectal Cancer BACKGROUND: Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level. METHODS: Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either ‘node-picking’ (the removal of an individual LLN) or ‘partial regional node dissection’ (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (≥7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection. RESULTS: Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2–2.5, p = 0.874). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10409808/ /pubmed/37340200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13460-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Colorectal Cancer Sluckin, Tania C. Hazen, Sanne-Marije J. A. Horsthuis, Karin Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. Aalbers, Arend G. J. Beets, Geerard L. Boerma, Evert-Jan G. Borstlap, Jaap van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian Burger, Jacobus W. A. Crolla, Rogier M. P. H. Daniëls-Gooszen, Alette W. Davids, Paul H. P. Dunker, Michalda S. Fabry, Hans F. J. Furnée, Edgar J. B. van Gils, Renza A. H. de Haas, Robbert J. Hoogendoorn, Stefan van Koeverden, Sebastiaan de Korte, Fleur I. Oosterling, Steven J. Peeters, Koen C. M. J. Posma, Lisanne A. E. Pultrum, Bareld B. Rothbarth, Joost Rutten, Harm J. T. Schasfoort, Renske A. Schreurs, Wilhelmina H. Simons, Petra C. G. Smits, Anke B. Talsma, Aaldert K. The, G. Y. Mireille van Tilborg, Fiek Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Vanhooymissen, Inge J. S. van de Ven, Anthony W. H. Verdaasdonk, Emiel G. G. Vermaas, Maarten Vliegen, Roy F. A. Vogelaar, F. Jeroen de Vries, Marianne Vroemen, Joy C. van Vugt, Sebastiaan T. Westerterp, Marinke van Westreenen, Henderik L. de Wilt, Johannes H. W. van der Zaag, Edwin S. Zimmerman, David D. E. Marijnen, Corrie A. M. Tanis, Pieter J. Kusters, Miranda Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting |
title | Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting |
title_full | Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting |
title_short | Evaluation of National Surgical Practice for Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer in an Untrained Setting |
title_sort | evaluation of national surgical practice for lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer in an untrained setting |
topic | Colorectal Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37340200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13460-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sluckintaniac evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT hazensannemarijeja evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT horsthuiskarin evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT beetstanreginagh evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT aalbersarendgj evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT beetsgeerardl evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT boermaevertjang evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT borstlapjaap evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vanbreestsmallenburgvivian evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT burgerjacobuswa evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT crollarogiermph evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT danielsgooszenalettew evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT davidspaulhp evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT dunkermichaldas evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT fabryhansfj evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT furneeedgarjb evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vangilsrenzaah evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT dehaasrobbertj evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT hoogendoornstefan evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vankoeverdensebastiaan evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT dekortefleuri evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT oosterlingstevenj evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT peeterskoencmj evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT posmalisanneae evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT pultrumbareldb evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT rothbarthjoost evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT ruttenharmjt evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT schasfoortrenskea evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT schreurswilhelminah evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT simonspetracg evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT smitsankeb evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT talsmaaaldertk evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT thegymireille evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vantilborgfiek evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT tuynmanjurriaanb evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vanhooymisseningejs evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vandevenanthonywh evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT verdaasdonkemielgg evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vermaasmaarten evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vliegenroyfa evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vogelaarfjeroen evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT devriesmarianne evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vroemenjoyc evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vanvugtsebastiaant evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT westerterpmarinke evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vanwestreenenhenderikl evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT dewiltjohanneshw evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT vanderzaagedwins evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT zimmermandavidde evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT marijnencorrieam evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT tanispieterj evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT kustersmiranda evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting AT evaluationofnationalsurgicalpracticeforlaterallymphnodesinrectalcancerinanuntrainedsetting |