Cargando…
Factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease
BACKGROUND: Several meta-analyses comparing the outcome of awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation procedures could not reveal significant differences concerning the postoperative improvement of motor symptoms. Only rarely information on the procedural details is provided for awake operations and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05624-4 |
_version_ | 1785086341162205184 |
---|---|
author | Mederer, Tobias Deuter, Daniel Bründl, Elisabeth Forras, Patricia Schmidt, Nils Ole Kohl, Zacharias Schlaier, Jürgen |
author_facet | Mederer, Tobias Deuter, Daniel Bründl, Elisabeth Forras, Patricia Schmidt, Nils Ole Kohl, Zacharias Schlaier, Jürgen |
author_sort | Mederer, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several meta-analyses comparing the outcome of awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation procedures could not reveal significant differences concerning the postoperative improvement of motor symptoms. Only rarely information on the procedural details is provided for awake operations and how often somnolence and disorientation occurred, which might hamper the reliability of intraoperative clinical testing. The aim of our study was to investigate possible influencing factors on the occurrence of somnolence and disorientation in awake DBS procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with Parkinson's disease having received implantation of a DBS system at our centre. Correlation analyses were performed for the duration of disease prior to surgery, number of microelectrode trajectories, AC-PC-coordinates of the planned target, UPDRS-scores, intraoperative application of sedative drugs, duration of the surgical procedure, perioperative application of apomorphine, and the preoperative L-DOPA equivalence dosage with the occurrence of intraoperative somnolence and disorientation. RESULTS: Patients with intraoperative somnolence were significantly older (p=0.039). Increased duration of the DBS procedure (p=0.020), delayed start of the surgery (p=0.049), higher number of MER trajectories (p=0.041), and the patients’ % UPDRS improvement (p=0.046) also correlated with the incidence of intraoperative somnolence. We identified the main contributing factor to intraoperative somnolence as the use of sedative drugs applied during skin incision and burr hole trepanation (p=0.019). Perioperatively applied apomorphine could reduce the occurrence of somnolent phases during the operation (p=0.026). CONCLUSION: Several influencing factors were found to seemingly increase the risk of intraoperative somnolence and disorientation, while the use of sedative drugs seems to be the main contributing factor. We argue that awake DBS procedures should omit the use of sedatives for best clinical outcome. When reporting on awake DBS surgery these factors should be considered and adjusted for, to permit reliable interpretation and comparison of DBS study results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-023-05624-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10409887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104098872023-08-10 Factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease Mederer, Tobias Deuter, Daniel Bründl, Elisabeth Forras, Patricia Schmidt, Nils Ole Kohl, Zacharias Schlaier, Jürgen Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article BACKGROUND: Several meta-analyses comparing the outcome of awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation procedures could not reveal significant differences concerning the postoperative improvement of motor symptoms. Only rarely information on the procedural details is provided for awake operations and how often somnolence and disorientation occurred, which might hamper the reliability of intraoperative clinical testing. The aim of our study was to investigate possible influencing factors on the occurrence of somnolence and disorientation in awake DBS procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with Parkinson's disease having received implantation of a DBS system at our centre. Correlation analyses were performed for the duration of disease prior to surgery, number of microelectrode trajectories, AC-PC-coordinates of the planned target, UPDRS-scores, intraoperative application of sedative drugs, duration of the surgical procedure, perioperative application of apomorphine, and the preoperative L-DOPA equivalence dosage with the occurrence of intraoperative somnolence and disorientation. RESULTS: Patients with intraoperative somnolence were significantly older (p=0.039). Increased duration of the DBS procedure (p=0.020), delayed start of the surgery (p=0.049), higher number of MER trajectories (p=0.041), and the patients’ % UPDRS improvement (p=0.046) also correlated with the incidence of intraoperative somnolence. We identified the main contributing factor to intraoperative somnolence as the use of sedative drugs applied during skin incision and burr hole trepanation (p=0.019). Perioperatively applied apomorphine could reduce the occurrence of somnolent phases during the operation (p=0.026). CONCLUSION: Several influencing factors were found to seemingly increase the risk of intraoperative somnolence and disorientation, while the use of sedative drugs seems to be the main contributing factor. We argue that awake DBS procedures should omit the use of sedatives for best clinical outcome. When reporting on awake DBS surgery these factors should be considered and adjusted for, to permit reliable interpretation and comparison of DBS study results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-023-05624-4. Springer Vienna 2023-06-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10409887/ /pubmed/37266718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05624-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mederer, Tobias Deuter, Daniel Bründl, Elisabeth Forras, Patricia Schmidt, Nils Ole Kohl, Zacharias Schlaier, Jürgen Factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease |
title | Factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease |
title_full | Factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease |
title_fullStr | Factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease |
title_short | Factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease |
title_sort | factors influencing the reliability of intraoperative testing in deep brain stimulation for parkinson’s disease |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10409887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05624-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mederertobias factorsinfluencingthereliabilityofintraoperativetestingindeepbrainstimulationforparkinsonsdisease AT deuterdaniel factorsinfluencingthereliabilityofintraoperativetestingindeepbrainstimulationforparkinsonsdisease AT brundlelisabeth factorsinfluencingthereliabilityofintraoperativetestingindeepbrainstimulationforparkinsonsdisease AT forraspatricia factorsinfluencingthereliabilityofintraoperativetestingindeepbrainstimulationforparkinsonsdisease AT schmidtnilsole factorsinfluencingthereliabilityofintraoperativetestingindeepbrainstimulationforparkinsonsdisease AT kohlzacharias factorsinfluencingthereliabilityofintraoperativetestingindeepbrainstimulationforparkinsonsdisease AT schlaierjurgen factorsinfluencingthereliabilityofintraoperativetestingindeepbrainstimulationforparkinsonsdisease |