Cargando…

Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology

Describing individual morphology and growth is key for identifying ecological niches and monitoring the health and fitness of populations. Eastern North Pacific ((ENP), approximately 16 650 individuals) gray whales primarily feed in the Arctic/sub-Arctic regions, while a small subgroup called the Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bierlich, K. C., Kane, A., Hildebrand, L., Bird, C. N., Fernandez Ajo, A., Stewart, J. D., Hewitt, J., Hildebrand, I., Sumich, J., Torres, L. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0043
_version_ 1785086405422088192
author Bierlich, K. C.
Kane, A.
Hildebrand, L.
Bird, C. N.
Fernandez Ajo, A.
Stewart, J. D.
Hewitt, J.
Hildebrand, I.
Sumich, J.
Torres, L. G.
author_facet Bierlich, K. C.
Kane, A.
Hildebrand, L.
Bird, C. N.
Fernandez Ajo, A.
Stewart, J. D.
Hewitt, J.
Hildebrand, I.
Sumich, J.
Torres, L. G.
author_sort Bierlich, K. C.
collection PubMed
description Describing individual morphology and growth is key for identifying ecological niches and monitoring the health and fitness of populations. Eastern North Pacific ((ENP), approximately 16 650 individuals) gray whales primarily feed in the Arctic/sub-Arctic regions, while a small subgroup called the Pacific Coast Feeding Group (PCFG, approximately 212 individuals) instead feeds between northern California, USA and British Columbia, Canada. Evidence suggests PCFG whales have lower body condition than ENP whales. Here we investigate morphological differences (length, skull, and fluke span) and compare length-at-age growth curves between ENP and PCFG whales. We use ENP gray whale length-at-age data comprised of strandings, whaling, and aerial photogrammetry (1926–1997) for comparison to data from PCFG whales collected through non-invasive techniques (2016–2022) to estimate age (photo identification) and length (drone-based photogrammetry). We use Bayesian methods to incorporate uncertainty associated with morphological measurements (manual and photogrammetric) and age estimates. We find that while PCFG and ENP whales have similar growth rates, PCFG whales reach smaller asymptotic lengths. Additionally, PCFG whales have relatively smaller skulls and flukes than ENP whales. These findings represent a striking example of morphological adaptation that may facilitate PCFG whales accessing a foraging niche distinct from the Arctic foraging grounds of the broader ENP population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10410206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104102062023-08-10 Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology Bierlich, K. C. Kane, A. Hildebrand, L. Bird, C. N. Fernandez Ajo, A. Stewart, J. D. Hewitt, J. Hildebrand, I. Sumich, J. Torres, L. G. Biol Lett Marine Biology Describing individual morphology and growth is key for identifying ecological niches and monitoring the health and fitness of populations. Eastern North Pacific ((ENP), approximately 16 650 individuals) gray whales primarily feed in the Arctic/sub-Arctic regions, while a small subgroup called the Pacific Coast Feeding Group (PCFG, approximately 212 individuals) instead feeds between northern California, USA and British Columbia, Canada. Evidence suggests PCFG whales have lower body condition than ENP whales. Here we investigate morphological differences (length, skull, and fluke span) and compare length-at-age growth curves between ENP and PCFG whales. We use ENP gray whale length-at-age data comprised of strandings, whaling, and aerial photogrammetry (1926–1997) for comparison to data from PCFG whales collected through non-invasive techniques (2016–2022) to estimate age (photo identification) and length (drone-based photogrammetry). We use Bayesian methods to incorporate uncertainty associated with morphological measurements (manual and photogrammetric) and age estimates. We find that while PCFG and ENP whales have similar growth rates, PCFG whales reach smaller asymptotic lengths. Additionally, PCFG whales have relatively smaller skulls and flukes than ENP whales. These findings represent a striking example of morphological adaptation that may facilitate PCFG whales accessing a foraging niche distinct from the Arctic foraging grounds of the broader ENP population. The Royal Society 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10410206/ /pubmed/37554011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0043 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Marine Biology
Bierlich, K. C.
Kane, A.
Hildebrand, L.
Bird, C. N.
Fernandez Ajo, A.
Stewart, J. D.
Hewitt, J.
Hildebrand, I.
Sumich, J.
Torres, L. G.
Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology
title Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology
title_full Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology
title_fullStr Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology
title_full_unstemmed Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology
title_short Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology
title_sort downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology
topic Marine Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0043
work_keys_str_mv AT bierlichkc downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT kanea downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT hildebrandl downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT birdcn downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT fernandezajoa downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT stewartjd downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT hewittj downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT hildebrandi downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT sumichj downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology
AT torreslg downsizedgraywhalesusinganalternativeforaginggroundhavesmallermorphology