Cargando…

Wound dehiscence in enhanced recovery after open radical cystectomy: A meta‐analysis

A meta‐analysis study to assess the outcome of enhanced recovery (ER) after radical cystectomy (RC) on wound dehiscence was performed. A comprehensive literature examination till January 2023 was implemented and 1457 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 772 open RC subjects in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Guojun, Liu, Yunbo, Ji, Xuhui, Zhang, Haiyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36880410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14136
Descripción
Sumario:A meta‐analysis study to assess the outcome of enhanced recovery (ER) after radical cystectomy (RC) on wound dehiscence was performed. A comprehensive literature examination till January 2023 was implemented and 1457 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 772 open RC subjects in the picked studies' baseline, 436 of them were enhanced recovery after RC, and 336 were open RC. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of enhanced recovery after RC on wound dehiscence after open RC by the dichotomous styles and a fixed or random model. The ER after RC caused significantly lower wound dehiscence (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30–0.89, P = .02) with low heterogeneity (I (2) = 46%) compared with open RC. The ER after RC caused significantly lower wound dehiscence compared with open RC. Thorough precaution should be taken when commerce with the consequences because a limited number of studies were found and selected for this meta‐analysis.