Cargando…

Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors

INTRODUCTION: Falls are one of the most common causes of emergency hospital visits in older people. Early recognition of an increased fall risk, which can be indicated by the occurrence of near-falls, is important to initiate interventions. METHODS: In a study with 87 subjects we simulated near-fall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hellmers, Sandra, Krey, Elias, Gashi, Arber, Koschate, Jessica, Schmidt, Laura, Stuckenschneider, Tim, Hein, Andreas, Zieschang, Tania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37564882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1223845
_version_ 1785086461753688064
author Hellmers, Sandra
Krey, Elias
Gashi, Arber
Koschate, Jessica
Schmidt, Laura
Stuckenschneider, Tim
Hein, Andreas
Zieschang, Tania
author_facet Hellmers, Sandra
Krey, Elias
Gashi, Arber
Koschate, Jessica
Schmidt, Laura
Stuckenschneider, Tim
Hein, Andreas
Zieschang, Tania
author_sort Hellmers, Sandra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Falls are one of the most common causes of emergency hospital visits in older people. Early recognition of an increased fall risk, which can be indicated by the occurrence of near-falls, is important to initiate interventions. METHODS: In a study with 87 subjects we simulated near-fall events on a perturbation treadmill and recorded them with inertial measurement units (IMU) at seven different positions. We investigated different machine learning models for the near-fall detection including support vector machines, AdaBoost, convolutional neural networks, and bidirectional long short-term memory networks. Additionally, we analyzed the influence of the sensor position on the classification results. RESULTS: The best results showed a DeepConvLSTM with an F1 score of 0.954 (precision 0.969, recall 0.942) at the sensor position “left wrist.” DISCUSSION: Since these results were obtained in the laboratory, the next step is to evaluate the suitability of the classifiers in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10410450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104104502023-08-10 Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors Hellmers, Sandra Krey, Elias Gashi, Arber Koschate, Jessica Schmidt, Laura Stuckenschneider, Tim Hein, Andreas Zieschang, Tania Front Digit Health Digital Health INTRODUCTION: Falls are one of the most common causes of emergency hospital visits in older people. Early recognition of an increased fall risk, which can be indicated by the occurrence of near-falls, is important to initiate interventions. METHODS: In a study with 87 subjects we simulated near-fall events on a perturbation treadmill and recorded them with inertial measurement units (IMU) at seven different positions. We investigated different machine learning models for the near-fall detection including support vector machines, AdaBoost, convolutional neural networks, and bidirectional long short-term memory networks. Additionally, we analyzed the influence of the sensor position on the classification results. RESULTS: The best results showed a DeepConvLSTM with an F1 score of 0.954 (precision 0.969, recall 0.942) at the sensor position “left wrist.” DISCUSSION: Since these results were obtained in the laboratory, the next step is to evaluate the suitability of the classifiers in the field. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10410450/ /pubmed/37564882 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1223845 Text en © 2023 Hellmers, Krey, Gashi, Koschate, Schmidt, Stuckenschneider, Hein and Zieschang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Digital Health
Hellmers, Sandra
Krey, Elias
Gashi, Arber
Koschate, Jessica
Schmidt, Laura
Stuckenschneider, Tim
Hein, Andreas
Zieschang, Tania
Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors
title Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors
title_full Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors
title_fullStr Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors
title_short Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors
title_sort comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors
topic Digital Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37564882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1223845
work_keys_str_mv AT hellmerssandra comparisonofmachinelearningapproachesfornearfalldetectionwithmotionsensors
AT kreyelias comparisonofmachinelearningapproachesfornearfalldetectionwithmotionsensors
AT gashiarber comparisonofmachinelearningapproachesfornearfalldetectionwithmotionsensors
AT koschatejessica comparisonofmachinelearningapproachesfornearfalldetectionwithmotionsensors
AT schmidtlaura comparisonofmachinelearningapproachesfornearfalldetectionwithmotionsensors
AT stuckenschneidertim comparisonofmachinelearningapproachesfornearfalldetectionwithmotionsensors
AT heinandreas comparisonofmachinelearningapproachesfornearfalldetectionwithmotionsensors
AT zieschangtania comparisonofmachinelearningapproachesfornearfalldetectionwithmotionsensors