Cargando…

A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter

Twitter has been adopted by physicians across most medical specialties; it allows for the wide dissemination of information and calls to action, brings new stakeholders into collations, promotes academic engagement, and fosters collaboration between academia and private practice. In this review of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cahill, Abigail M, Carlson, John C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565125
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41632
_version_ 1785086511527493632
author Cahill, Abigail M
Carlson, John C
author_facet Cahill, Abigail M
Carlson, John C
author_sort Cahill, Abigail M
collection PubMed
description Twitter has been adopted by physicians across most medical specialties; it allows for the wide dissemination of information and calls to action, brings new stakeholders into collations, promotes academic engagement, and fosters collaboration between academia and private practice. In this review of the literature, we briefly outline the state of advocacy in health care and summarize current Twitter-based advocacy efforts in the major specialties of health care, identifying both successful strategies as well as gaps in Twitter advocacy research. Relevant articles were obtained via PubMed and Google Scholar searches using the phrases “Twitter advocacy healthcare,” “[specialty name] Twitter” and “[specialty name] Twitter advocacy.” Several overarching themes were found to be widely utilized in specialty-specific discussions of Twitter advocacy efforts: organizing under a specific hashtag, fostering dialogue between stakeholders, and tweeting using personalized, action-oriented language. Fields such as pediatrics, heme/onc, ENT, and ophthalmology have most thoroughly embraced the desire to learn how to most effectively advocate on Twitter. Other fields such as OBGYN, cardiology, and surgery have less academic focus on online advocacy. Outside of advocacy efforts, the research and academic benefits of Twitter are well described in nearly every specialty. In conclusion, while clinicians are encouraged to advocate online, only broad strategies for online engagement are currently offered. Additional research into the details of how to successfully create an online profile and Twitter presence is needed to ensure all physicians are able to maximize their advocacy efforts, with clarification of the goals and objectives of this engagement also required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10410681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104106812023-08-10 A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter Cahill, Abigail M Carlson, John C Cureus Medical Education Twitter has been adopted by physicians across most medical specialties; it allows for the wide dissemination of information and calls to action, brings new stakeholders into collations, promotes academic engagement, and fosters collaboration between academia and private practice. In this review of the literature, we briefly outline the state of advocacy in health care and summarize current Twitter-based advocacy efforts in the major specialties of health care, identifying both successful strategies as well as gaps in Twitter advocacy research. Relevant articles were obtained via PubMed and Google Scholar searches using the phrases “Twitter advocacy healthcare,” “[specialty name] Twitter” and “[specialty name] Twitter advocacy.” Several overarching themes were found to be widely utilized in specialty-specific discussions of Twitter advocacy efforts: organizing under a specific hashtag, fostering dialogue between stakeholders, and tweeting using personalized, action-oriented language. Fields such as pediatrics, heme/onc, ENT, and ophthalmology have most thoroughly embraced the desire to learn how to most effectively advocate on Twitter. Other fields such as OBGYN, cardiology, and surgery have less academic focus on online advocacy. Outside of advocacy efforts, the research and academic benefits of Twitter are well described in nearly every specialty. In conclusion, while clinicians are encouraged to advocate online, only broad strategies for online engagement are currently offered. Additional research into the details of how to successfully create an online profile and Twitter presence is needed to ensure all physicians are able to maximize their advocacy efforts, with clarification of the goals and objectives of this engagement also required. Cureus 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10410681/ /pubmed/37565125 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41632 Text en Copyright © 2023, Cahill et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Cahill, Abigail M
Carlson, John C
A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter
title A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter
title_full A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter
title_fullStr A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter
title_short A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter
title_sort scoping review of physician advocacy on twitter
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565125
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41632
work_keys_str_mv AT cahillabigailm ascopingreviewofphysicianadvocacyontwitter
AT carlsonjohnc ascopingreviewofphysicianadvocacyontwitter
AT cahillabigailm scopingreviewofphysicianadvocacyontwitter
AT carlsonjohnc scopingreviewofphysicianadvocacyontwitter