Cargando…

Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND: On average, older patients use five or more medications daily. A consequence is an increased risk of adverse drug reactions, interactions, or medication errors. Therefore, it is important to understand the challenges experienced by the patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikkelsen, Thorbjørn Hougaard, Søndergaard, Jens, Kjaer, Niels Kristian, Nielsen, Jesper Bo, Ryg, Jesper, Kjeldsen, Lene Juel, Mogensen, Christian Backer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04131-6
_version_ 1785086546177687552
author Mikkelsen, Thorbjørn Hougaard
Søndergaard, Jens
Kjaer, Niels Kristian
Nielsen, Jesper Bo
Ryg, Jesper
Kjeldsen, Lene Juel
Mogensen, Christian Backer
author_facet Mikkelsen, Thorbjørn Hougaard
Søndergaard, Jens
Kjaer, Niels Kristian
Nielsen, Jesper Bo
Ryg, Jesper
Kjeldsen, Lene Juel
Mogensen, Christian Backer
author_sort Mikkelsen, Thorbjørn Hougaard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: On average, older patients use five or more medications daily. A consequence is an increased risk of adverse drug reactions, interactions, or medication errors. Therefore, it is important to understand the challenges experienced by the patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals pertinent to the concomitant use of many drugs. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using focus group interviews to collect information from patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals regarding older patients’ management of prescribed medicine. We interviewed seven patients using five or more medications daily, three relatives, three general practitioners, nine nurses from different healthcare sectors, one home care assistant, two hospital physicians, and four pharmacists. RESULTS: The following themes were identified: (1) Unintentional non-adherence, (2) Intentional non-adherence, (3) Generic substitution, (4) Medication lists, (5) Timing and medication schedule, (6) Medication reviews and (7) Dose dispensing/pill organizers. CONCLUSION: Medication is the subject of concern among patients and relatives. They become confused and insecure about information from different actors and the package leaflets. Therefore, patients often request a thorough medication review to provide an overview, knowledge of possible side effects and interactions, and a clarification of the medication’s timing. In addition, patients, relatives and nurses all request an indication of when medicine should be taken, including allowable deviations from this timing. Therefore, prescribing physicians should prioritize communicating information regarding these matters when prescribing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04131-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10410867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104108672023-08-10 Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals Mikkelsen, Thorbjørn Hougaard Søndergaard, Jens Kjaer, Niels Kristian Nielsen, Jesper Bo Ryg, Jesper Kjeldsen, Lene Juel Mogensen, Christian Backer BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: On average, older patients use five or more medications daily. A consequence is an increased risk of adverse drug reactions, interactions, or medication errors. Therefore, it is important to understand the challenges experienced by the patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals pertinent to the concomitant use of many drugs. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using focus group interviews to collect information from patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals regarding older patients’ management of prescribed medicine. We interviewed seven patients using five or more medications daily, three relatives, three general practitioners, nine nurses from different healthcare sectors, one home care assistant, two hospital physicians, and four pharmacists. RESULTS: The following themes were identified: (1) Unintentional non-adherence, (2) Intentional non-adherence, (3) Generic substitution, (4) Medication lists, (5) Timing and medication schedule, (6) Medication reviews and (7) Dose dispensing/pill organizers. CONCLUSION: Medication is the subject of concern among patients and relatives. They become confused and insecure about information from different actors and the package leaflets. Therefore, patients often request a thorough medication review to provide an overview, knowledge of possible side effects and interactions, and a clarification of the medication’s timing. In addition, patients, relatives and nurses all request an indication of when medicine should be taken, including allowable deviations from this timing. Therefore, prescribing physicians should prioritize communicating information regarding these matters when prescribing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04131-6. BioMed Central 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10410867/ /pubmed/37553585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04131-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mikkelsen, Thorbjørn Hougaard
Søndergaard, Jens
Kjaer, Niels Kristian
Nielsen, Jesper Bo
Ryg, Jesper
Kjeldsen, Lene Juel
Mogensen, Christian Backer
Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
title Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
title_full Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
title_fullStr Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
title_full_unstemmed Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
title_short Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
title_sort handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04131-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mikkelsenthorbjørnhougaard handlingpolypharmacyaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupinterviewswitholderpatientstheirrelativesandhealthcareprofessionals
AT søndergaardjens handlingpolypharmacyaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupinterviewswitholderpatientstheirrelativesandhealthcareprofessionals
AT kjaernielskristian handlingpolypharmacyaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupinterviewswitholderpatientstheirrelativesandhealthcareprofessionals
AT nielsenjesperbo handlingpolypharmacyaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupinterviewswitholderpatientstheirrelativesandhealthcareprofessionals
AT rygjesper handlingpolypharmacyaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupinterviewswitholderpatientstheirrelativesandhealthcareprofessionals
AT kjeldsenlenejuel handlingpolypharmacyaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupinterviewswitholderpatientstheirrelativesandhealthcareprofessionals
AT mogensenchristianbacker handlingpolypharmacyaqualitativestudyusingfocusgroupinterviewswitholderpatientstheirrelativesandhealthcareprofessionals