Cargando…

Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background  Throughout graduate and postgraduate education, trainees need to gauge the impact of training location on future institutions of practice. Objective  We assessed rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty at academic institutions from their same institution of training. Methods  T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizk, Emanuelle M., Wang, Jiangxia, Zhao, Xiyu, Tsou, Brittany, Metiku, Beruk E., Cho, Katie, Samineni, Pranav, Sridhar, Jayanth, Woreta, Fasika A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37564160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771377
_version_ 1785086591320981504
author Rizk, Emanuelle M.
Wang, Jiangxia
Zhao, Xiyu
Tsou, Brittany
Metiku, Beruk E.
Cho, Katie
Samineni, Pranav
Sridhar, Jayanth
Woreta, Fasika A.
author_facet Rizk, Emanuelle M.
Wang, Jiangxia
Zhao, Xiyu
Tsou, Brittany
Metiku, Beruk E.
Cho, Katie
Samineni, Pranav
Sridhar, Jayanth
Woreta, Fasika A.
author_sort Rizk, Emanuelle M.
collection PubMed
description Background  Throughout graduate and postgraduate education, trainees need to gauge the impact of training location on future institutions of practice. Objective  We assessed rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty at academic institutions from their same institution of training. Methods  This was a cross-sectional study. We included 1,246 clinical ophthalmology faculty at the 13 top-ranked institutions listed in the 2021 U.S. News and World Report. Primary, emeritus, adjunct, and affiliate faculty were included. Publicly available information was collected from institutional websites and other online sources. Statistical analyses were conducted using t -tests or Mann–Whitney tests, chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression. The main outcome measured was internal hires, defined as faculty who had completed residency and/or fellowship training at their current institution. Results  In total, 47.3% of faculty were internal hires who completed residency or fellowship at the same institution. Among externally trained faculty, 27.7% completed residency and 56.0% completed fellowship at another top 13 programs. Internal hires were more frequently fellowship-trained, had a greater number of publications, and practiced in smaller departments ( p  < 0.001, p  < 0.001, and p  = 0.002, respectively). A greater proportion of internal hires held leadership positions ( p  = 0.012). Faculty practicing in the Midwest or West and with more years since residency graduation were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–0.48; OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31–0.78; OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97–0.99, respectively) to be internal hires. Faculty with non-R01 National Institutes of Health funding were more likely to be internal hires (OR, 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12–2.96). Conclusions  Training institution is key to determining the institution of practice. These results may be beneficial for trainees to consider when selecting a training program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10411073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104110732023-08-10 Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study Rizk, Emanuelle M. Wang, Jiangxia Zhao, Xiyu Tsou, Brittany Metiku, Beruk E. Cho, Katie Samineni, Pranav Sridhar, Jayanth Woreta, Fasika A. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Background  Throughout graduate and postgraduate education, trainees need to gauge the impact of training location on future institutions of practice. Objective  We assessed rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty at academic institutions from their same institution of training. Methods  This was a cross-sectional study. We included 1,246 clinical ophthalmology faculty at the 13 top-ranked institutions listed in the 2021 U.S. News and World Report. Primary, emeritus, adjunct, and affiliate faculty were included. Publicly available information was collected from institutional websites and other online sources. Statistical analyses were conducted using t -tests or Mann–Whitney tests, chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression. The main outcome measured was internal hires, defined as faculty who had completed residency and/or fellowship training at their current institution. Results  In total, 47.3% of faculty were internal hires who completed residency or fellowship at the same institution. Among externally trained faculty, 27.7% completed residency and 56.0% completed fellowship at another top 13 programs. Internal hires were more frequently fellowship-trained, had a greater number of publications, and practiced in smaller departments ( p  < 0.001, p  < 0.001, and p  = 0.002, respectively). A greater proportion of internal hires held leadership positions ( p  = 0.012). Faculty practicing in the Midwest or West and with more years since residency graduation were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–0.48; OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31–0.78; OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97–0.99, respectively) to be internal hires. Faculty with non-R01 National Institutes of Health funding were more likely to be internal hires (OR, 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12–2.96). Conclusions  Training institution is key to determining the institution of practice. These results may be beneficial for trainees to consider when selecting a training program. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10411073/ /pubmed/37564160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771377 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rizk, Emanuelle M.
Wang, Jiangxia
Zhao, Xiyu
Tsou, Brittany
Metiku, Beruk E.
Cho, Katie
Samineni, Pranav
Sridhar, Jayanth
Woreta, Fasika A.
Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty from their institution of training at top academic medical centers: a cross-sectional study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37564160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771377
work_keys_str_mv AT rizkemanuellem ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy
AT wangjiangxia ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy
AT zhaoxiyu ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy
AT tsoubrittany ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy
AT metikuberuke ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy
AT chokatie ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy
AT saminenipranav ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy
AT sridharjayanth ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy
AT woretafasikaa ratesofinternalhiringofophthalmologyfacultyfromtheirinstitutionoftrainingattopacademicmedicalcentersacrosssectionalstudy