Cargando…
Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study
Objective This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to compare the ultrasound-guided (USG) technique with the standard single-wall puncture technique for epicutaneo-caval catheter (ECC) placement in neonates. Study Design A total of 100 neonates were included in this study. All enrolled n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733958 |
_version_ | 1785086596918280192 |
---|---|
author | Tu, Zhenzhen Tan, Yanzhe Liu, Lifei Xie, Jia Xu, Ying Liu, Wei |
author_facet | Tu, Zhenzhen Tan, Yanzhe Liu, Lifei Xie, Jia Xu, Ying Liu, Wei |
author_sort | Tu, Zhenzhen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to compare the ultrasound-guided (USG) technique with the standard single-wall puncture technique for epicutaneo-caval catheter (ECC) placement in neonates. Study Design A total of 100 neonates were included in this study. All enrolled neonates were randomly divided into two groups ( n = 50): the USG group and the control group. The control group underwent standard single-wall puncture for ECC placement procedures, and the USG group underwent USG ECC placement procedures. Results The first attempt success rates (62 vs. 38%; p = 0.016) and the total success rates (92 vs. 74%; p = 0.017) were higher in the USG group than in the control group. The procedure time was shorter in the USG group than in the control group: 351.43 (112.95) versus 739.78 seconds (369.13), p < 0.001. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Compared with the standard single-wall puncture method, USG cannulation is superior for neonatal ECC placement, with a higher success rate, and decreases the total procedural time. Key Points: Establishing ECCs in neonates is challenging and lead to multiple attempts and adverse events. Information on the efficiency of USG dynamic needle tip positioning for ECCs in neonates is lacking. Compared with the standard puncture method, USG cannulation is superior for neonatal ECC placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10411099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104110992023-08-10 Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study Tu, Zhenzhen Tan, Yanzhe Liu, Lifei Xie, Jia Xu, Ying Liu, Wei Am J Perinatol Objective This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to compare the ultrasound-guided (USG) technique with the standard single-wall puncture technique for epicutaneo-caval catheter (ECC) placement in neonates. Study Design A total of 100 neonates were included in this study. All enrolled neonates were randomly divided into two groups ( n = 50): the USG group and the control group. The control group underwent standard single-wall puncture for ECC placement procedures, and the USG group underwent USG ECC placement procedures. Results The first attempt success rates (62 vs. 38%; p = 0.016) and the total success rates (92 vs. 74%; p = 0.017) were higher in the USG group than in the control group. The procedure time was shorter in the USG group than in the control group: 351.43 (112.95) versus 739.78 seconds (369.13), p < 0.001. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Compared with the standard single-wall puncture method, USG cannulation is superior for neonatal ECC placement, with a higher success rate, and decreases the total procedural time. Key Points: Establishing ECCs in neonates is challenging and lead to multiple attempts and adverse events. Information on the efficiency of USG dynamic needle tip positioning for ECCs in neonates is lacking. Compared with the standard puncture method, USG cannulation is superior for neonatal ECC placement. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10411099/ /pubmed/34450674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733958 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Tu, Zhenzhen Tan, Yanzhe Liu, Lifei Xie, Jia Xu, Ying Liu, Wei Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study |
title | Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study |
title_full | Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study |
title_short | Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study |
title_sort | ultrasound-guided cannulation of the great saphenous vein in neonates: a randomized study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuzhenzhen ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy AT tanyanzhe ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy AT liulifei ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy AT xiejia ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy AT xuying ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy AT liuwei ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy |