Cargando…

Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study

Objective  This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to compare the ultrasound-guided (USG) technique with the standard single-wall puncture technique for epicutaneo-caval catheter (ECC) placement in neonates. Study Design  A total of 100 neonates were included in this study. All enrolled n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tu, Zhenzhen, Tan, Yanzhe, Liu, Lifei, Xie, Jia, Xu, Ying, Liu, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733958
_version_ 1785086596918280192
author Tu, Zhenzhen
Tan, Yanzhe
Liu, Lifei
Xie, Jia
Xu, Ying
Liu, Wei
author_facet Tu, Zhenzhen
Tan, Yanzhe
Liu, Lifei
Xie, Jia
Xu, Ying
Liu, Wei
author_sort Tu, Zhenzhen
collection PubMed
description Objective  This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to compare the ultrasound-guided (USG) technique with the standard single-wall puncture technique for epicutaneo-caval catheter (ECC) placement in neonates. Study Design  A total of 100 neonates were included in this study. All enrolled neonates were randomly divided into two groups ( n  = 50): the USG group and the control group. The control group underwent standard single-wall puncture for ECC placement procedures, and the USG group underwent USG ECC placement procedures. Results  The first attempt success rates (62 vs. 38%; p  = 0.016) and the total success rates (92 vs. 74%; p  = 0.017) were higher in the USG group than in the control group. The procedure time was shorter in the USG group than in the control group: 351.43 (112.95) versus 739.78 seconds (369.13), p  < 0.001. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion  Compared with the standard single-wall puncture method, USG cannulation is superior for neonatal ECC placement, with a higher success rate, and decreases the total procedural time. Key Points: Establishing ECCs in neonates is challenging and lead to multiple attempts and adverse events. Information on the efficiency of USG dynamic needle tip positioning for ECCs in neonates is lacking. Compared with the standard puncture method, USG cannulation is superior for neonatal ECC placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10411099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104110992023-08-10 Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study Tu, Zhenzhen Tan, Yanzhe Liu, Lifei Xie, Jia Xu, Ying Liu, Wei Am J Perinatol Objective  This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to compare the ultrasound-guided (USG) technique with the standard single-wall puncture technique for epicutaneo-caval catheter (ECC) placement in neonates. Study Design  A total of 100 neonates were included in this study. All enrolled neonates were randomly divided into two groups ( n  = 50): the USG group and the control group. The control group underwent standard single-wall puncture for ECC placement procedures, and the USG group underwent USG ECC placement procedures. Results  The first attempt success rates (62 vs. 38%; p  = 0.016) and the total success rates (92 vs. 74%; p  = 0.017) were higher in the USG group than in the control group. The procedure time was shorter in the USG group than in the control group: 351.43 (112.95) versus 739.78 seconds (369.13), p  < 0.001. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion  Compared with the standard single-wall puncture method, USG cannulation is superior for neonatal ECC placement, with a higher success rate, and decreases the total procedural time. Key Points: Establishing ECCs in neonates is challenging and lead to multiple attempts and adverse events. Information on the efficiency of USG dynamic needle tip positioning for ECCs in neonates is lacking. Compared with the standard puncture method, USG cannulation is superior for neonatal ECC placement. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10411099/ /pubmed/34450674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733958 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Tu, Zhenzhen
Tan, Yanzhe
Liu, Lifei
Xie, Jia
Xu, Ying
Liu, Wei
Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study
title Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study
title_full Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study
title_fullStr Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study
title_short Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Great Saphenous Vein in Neonates: A Randomized Study
title_sort ultrasound-guided cannulation of the great saphenous vein in neonates: a randomized study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34450674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733958
work_keys_str_mv AT tuzhenzhen ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy
AT tanyanzhe ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy
AT liulifei ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy
AT xiejia ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy
AT xuying ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy
AT liuwei ultrasoundguidedcannulationofthegreatsaphenousveininneonatesarandomizedstudy