Cargando…
Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s
Background and study aims Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is considered usually endoscopically invisible and the endoscopic features are not well described. This study aimed to: 1) evaluate the frequency of visible BE-LGD; 2) compare rates of BE-LGD detection in the community...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37564334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2102-7726 |
_version_ | 1785086599083589632 |
---|---|
author | He, Tony Iyer, Kiran Gopinath Lai, Mark House, Eloise Slavin, John L Holt, Bronte Tsoi, Edward H Desmond, Paul Taylor, Andrew C F |
author_facet | He, Tony Iyer, Kiran Gopinath Lai, Mark House, Eloise Slavin, John L Holt, Bronte Tsoi, Edward H Desmond, Paul Taylor, Andrew C F |
author_sort | He, Tony |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is considered usually endoscopically invisible and the endoscopic features are not well described. This study aimed to: 1) evaluate the frequency of visible BE-LGD; 2) compare rates of BE-LGD detection in the community versus a Barrett’s referral unit (BRU); and 3) evaluate the endoscopic features of BE-LGD. Patients and methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively observed cohort of 497 patients referred to a BRU with dysplastic BE between 2008 and 2022. BE-LGD was defined as confirmation of LGD by expert gastrointestinal pathologist(s). Endoscopy reports, images and histology reports were reviewed to evaluate the frequency of endoscopically identifiable BE-LGD and their endoscopic features. Results A total of 135 patients (27.2%) had confirmed BE-LGD, of whom 15 (11.1%) had visible LGD identified in the community. After BRU assessment, visible LGD was detected in 68 patients (50.4%). Three phenotypes were observed: (A) Non-visible LGD; (B) Elevated (Paris 0-IIa) lesions; and (C) Flat (Paris 0-IIb) lesions with abnormal mucosal and/or vascular patterns with clear demarcation from regular flat BE. The majority (64.7%) of visible LGD was flat lesions with abnormal mucosal and vascular patterns. Endoscopic detection of BE-LGD increased over time (38.7% (2009–2012) vs. 54.3% (2018–2022)). Conclusions In this cohort, 50.4% of true BE-LGD was endoscopically visible, with increased recognition endoscopically over time and a higher rate of visible LGD detected at a BRU when compared with the community. BRU assessment of BE-LGD remains crucial; however, improving endoscopy surveillance quality in the community is equally important. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10411114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104111142023-08-10 Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s He, Tony Iyer, Kiran Gopinath Lai, Mark House, Eloise Slavin, John L Holt, Bronte Tsoi, Edward H Desmond, Paul Taylor, Andrew C F Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is considered usually endoscopically invisible and the endoscopic features are not well described. This study aimed to: 1) evaluate the frequency of visible BE-LGD; 2) compare rates of BE-LGD detection in the community versus a Barrett’s referral unit (BRU); and 3) evaluate the endoscopic features of BE-LGD. Patients and methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively observed cohort of 497 patients referred to a BRU with dysplastic BE between 2008 and 2022. BE-LGD was defined as confirmation of LGD by expert gastrointestinal pathologist(s). Endoscopy reports, images and histology reports were reviewed to evaluate the frequency of endoscopically identifiable BE-LGD and their endoscopic features. Results A total of 135 patients (27.2%) had confirmed BE-LGD, of whom 15 (11.1%) had visible LGD identified in the community. After BRU assessment, visible LGD was detected in 68 patients (50.4%). Three phenotypes were observed: (A) Non-visible LGD; (B) Elevated (Paris 0-IIa) lesions; and (C) Flat (Paris 0-IIb) lesions with abnormal mucosal and/or vascular patterns with clear demarcation from regular flat BE. The majority (64.7%) of visible LGD was flat lesions with abnormal mucosal and vascular patterns. Endoscopic detection of BE-LGD increased over time (38.7% (2009–2012) vs. 54.3% (2018–2022)). Conclusions In this cohort, 50.4% of true BE-LGD was endoscopically visible, with increased recognition endoscopically over time and a higher rate of visible LGD detected at a BRU when compared with the community. BRU assessment of BE-LGD remains crucial; however, improving endoscopy surveillance quality in the community is equally important. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10411114/ /pubmed/37564334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2102-7726 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | He, Tony Iyer, Kiran Gopinath Lai, Mark House, Eloise Slavin, John L Holt, Bronte Tsoi, Edward H Desmond, Paul Taylor, Andrew C F Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s |
title | Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s |
title_full | Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s |
title_short | Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s |
title_sort | endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic barrett’s |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37564334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2102-7726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hetony endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts AT iyerkirangopinath endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts AT laimark endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts AT houseeloise endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts AT slavinjohnl endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts AT holtbronte endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts AT tsoiedwardh endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts AT desmondpaul endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts AT taylorandrewcf endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts |