Cargando…

Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s

Background and study aims Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is considered usually endoscopically invisible and the endoscopic features are not well described. This study aimed to: 1) evaluate the frequency of visible BE-LGD; 2) compare rates of BE-LGD detection in the community...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Tony, Iyer, Kiran Gopinath, Lai, Mark, House, Eloise, Slavin, John L, Holt, Bronte, Tsoi, Edward H, Desmond, Paul, Taylor, Andrew C F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37564334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2102-7726
_version_ 1785086599083589632
author He, Tony
Iyer, Kiran Gopinath
Lai, Mark
House, Eloise
Slavin, John L
Holt, Bronte
Tsoi, Edward H
Desmond, Paul
Taylor, Andrew C F
author_facet He, Tony
Iyer, Kiran Gopinath
Lai, Mark
House, Eloise
Slavin, John L
Holt, Bronte
Tsoi, Edward H
Desmond, Paul
Taylor, Andrew C F
author_sort He, Tony
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is considered usually endoscopically invisible and the endoscopic features are not well described. This study aimed to: 1) evaluate the frequency of visible BE-LGD; 2) compare rates of BE-LGD detection in the community versus a Barrett’s referral unit (BRU); and 3) evaluate the endoscopic features of BE-LGD. Patients and methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively observed cohort of 497 patients referred to a BRU with dysplastic BE between 2008 and 2022. BE-LGD was defined as confirmation of LGD by expert gastrointestinal pathologist(s). Endoscopy reports, images and histology reports were reviewed to evaluate the frequency of endoscopically identifiable BE-LGD and their endoscopic features. Results A total of 135 patients (27.2%) had confirmed BE-LGD, of whom 15 (11.1%) had visible LGD identified in the community. After BRU assessment, visible LGD was detected in 68 patients (50.4%). Three phenotypes were observed: (A) Non-visible LGD; (B) Elevated (Paris 0-IIa) lesions; and (C) Flat (Paris 0-IIb) lesions with abnormal mucosal and/or vascular patterns with clear demarcation from regular flat BE. The majority (64.7%) of visible LGD was flat lesions with abnormal mucosal and vascular patterns. Endoscopic detection of BE-LGD increased over time (38.7% (2009–2012) vs. 54.3% (2018–2022)). Conclusions In this cohort, 50.4% of true BE-LGD was endoscopically visible, with increased recognition endoscopically over time and a higher rate of visible LGD detected at a BRU when compared with the community. BRU assessment of BE-LGD remains crucial; however, improving endoscopy surveillance quality in the community is equally important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10411114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104111142023-08-10 Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s He, Tony Iyer, Kiran Gopinath Lai, Mark House, Eloise Slavin, John L Holt, Bronte Tsoi, Edward H Desmond, Paul Taylor, Andrew C F Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is considered usually endoscopically invisible and the endoscopic features are not well described. This study aimed to: 1) evaluate the frequency of visible BE-LGD; 2) compare rates of BE-LGD detection in the community versus a Barrett’s referral unit (BRU); and 3) evaluate the endoscopic features of BE-LGD. Patients and methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively observed cohort of 497 patients referred to a BRU with dysplastic BE between 2008 and 2022. BE-LGD was defined as confirmation of LGD by expert gastrointestinal pathologist(s). Endoscopy reports, images and histology reports were reviewed to evaluate the frequency of endoscopically identifiable BE-LGD and their endoscopic features. Results A total of 135 patients (27.2%) had confirmed BE-LGD, of whom 15 (11.1%) had visible LGD identified in the community. After BRU assessment, visible LGD was detected in 68 patients (50.4%). Three phenotypes were observed: (A) Non-visible LGD; (B) Elevated (Paris 0-IIa) lesions; and (C) Flat (Paris 0-IIb) lesions with abnormal mucosal and/or vascular patterns with clear demarcation from regular flat BE. The majority (64.7%) of visible LGD was flat lesions with abnormal mucosal and vascular patterns. Endoscopic detection of BE-LGD increased over time (38.7% (2009–2012) vs. 54.3% (2018–2022)). Conclusions In this cohort, 50.4% of true BE-LGD was endoscopically visible, with increased recognition endoscopically over time and a higher rate of visible LGD detected at a BRU when compared with the community. BRU assessment of BE-LGD remains crucial; however, improving endoscopy surveillance quality in the community is equally important. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10411114/ /pubmed/37564334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2102-7726 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle He, Tony
Iyer, Kiran Gopinath
Lai, Mark
House, Eloise
Slavin, John L
Holt, Bronte
Tsoi, Edward H
Desmond, Paul
Taylor, Andrew C F
Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s
title Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s
title_full Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s
title_fullStr Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s
title_short Endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic Barrett’s
title_sort endoscopic features of low-grade dysplastic barrett’s
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37564334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2102-7726
work_keys_str_mv AT hetony endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts
AT iyerkirangopinath endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts
AT laimark endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts
AT houseeloise endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts
AT slavinjohnl endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts
AT holtbronte endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts
AT tsoiedwardh endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts
AT desmondpaul endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts
AT taylorandrewcf endoscopicfeaturesoflowgradedysplasticbarretts