Cargando…

Risk Factors for Intrapartum Cesarean Section Delivery in Low-risk Multiparous Women Following at Least a Prior Vaginal Birth (Robson Classification 3 and 4)

Objective  The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk factors for cesarean section (C-section) in low-risk multiparous women with a history of vaginal birth. Methods  The present retrospective study included low-risk multiparous women with a history of vaginal birth who gave birth at betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buyuk, Gul Nihal, Kansu-Celik, Hatice, Kaplan, Zeynep Asli Oskovi, Kisa, Burcu, Ozel, Sule, Engin-Ustun, Yaprak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34318468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731378
Descripción
Sumario:Objective  The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk factors for cesarean section (C-section) in low-risk multiparous women with a history of vaginal birth. Methods  The present retrospective study included low-risk multiparous women with a history of vaginal birth who gave birth at between 37 and 42 gestational weeks. The subjects were divided into 2 groups according to the mode of delivery, as C-section Group and vaginal delivery Group. Risk factors for C-section such as demographic characteristics, ultrasonographic measurements, smoking, weight gain during pregnancy (WGDP), interval time between prior birth, history of macrosomic birth, and cervical dilatation at the admission to the hospital were obtained from the charts of the patients. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups. Results  The most common C-section indications were fetal distress and macrosomia (33.9% [ n  = 77 and 20.7% [ n  = 47] respectively). A bivariate correlation analysis demonstrated that mothers aged > 30 years old (odds ratio [OR]: 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30–3.34; p  = 0.002), parity >1 (OR: 1.81; 95%CI: 1.18–2.71; p  = 0.006), fetal abdominal circumference (FAC) measurement > 360 mm (OR: 34.20; 95%CI: 8.04—145.56; p  < 0.001)) and < 345 mm (OR: 3.06; 95%CI: 1.88–5; p  < 0.001), presence of large for gestational age (LGA) fetus (OR: 5.09; 95%CI: 1.35–19.21; p  = 0.016), premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (OR: 1.52; 95%CI: 1–2.33; p  = 0.041), and cervical dilatation < 5cm at admission (OR: 2.12; 95%CI: 1.34–3.34; p  = 0.001) were associated with the group requiring a C-section. Conclusion  This is the first study evaluating the risk factors for C-section in low-risk multiparous women with a history of vaginal birth according to the Robson classification 3 and 4. Fetal distress and suspected fetal macrosomia constituted most of the C-section indications.