Cargando…

Does the Ranking Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of the 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Treatment Recommendations for Acute Mania on Rehospitalization Rates

OBJECTIVE: There is limited data about the impact of mood disorders treatment guidelines on clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of prescribers’ adherence to the 2018 Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Fabiano A., Dumay, Henrique, Fagen, Julia, Palma, Natalie, Milev, Roumen, Brietzke, Elisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37551100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07067437231156235
_version_ 1785086649424674816
author Gomes, Fabiano A.
Dumay, Henrique
Fagen, Julia
Palma, Natalie
Milev, Roumen
Brietzke, Elisa
author_facet Gomes, Fabiano A.
Dumay, Henrique
Fagen, Julia
Palma, Natalie
Milev, Roumen
Brietzke, Elisa
author_sort Gomes, Fabiano A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is limited data about the impact of mood disorders treatment guidelines on clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of prescribers’ adherence to the 2018 Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) treatment guidelines recommendations on the readmission rates of patients hospitalized for mania. METHOD: A retrospective cohort of all individuals admitted due to acute mania to Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, from January 2018 to July 2021 was included in this study. Patient variables and data regarding index admission and subsequent hospitalizations were extracted from medical records up to December 31, 2021. Treatment regimens were classified as first-line, second-line, noncompliant, or no treatment. We explored the associations between treatment regimens and the risk of readmissions using univariate, multivariate, and survival analysis. RESULTS: We identified 211 hospitalizations related to 165 patients. The mean time-to-readmission was 211.8 days (standard deviation [SD]  =  247.1); the 30-day rehospitalization rate was 13.7%, and any rehospitalization rate was 40.3%. Compared to no treatment, only first-line treatments were associated with a statistically significant decreased risk of 30-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.209; 95% CI, 0.058 to 0.670). The risk of any readmission was reduced by first-line (OR = 0.387; 95% CI, 0.173 to 0.848) and noncompliant regimens (OR = 0.414; 95% CI, 0.174 to 0.982) compared to no treatment. On survival analysis, no treatment group was associated with shorter time-to-readmission (log-rank test, p  =  0.014) and increased risk of readmission (hazard ratio = 2.27; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.96) when compared to first-line medications. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with first-line medications was associated with lower 30-day rehospitalization rates and longer time-to-readmission. Physicians’ adherence to treatments with higher-ranked evidence for efficacy, safety, and tolerability may improve bipolar disorder outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10411363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104113632023-08-10 Does the Ranking Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of the 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Treatment Recommendations for Acute Mania on Rehospitalization Rates Gomes, Fabiano A. Dumay, Henrique Fagen, Julia Palma, Natalie Milev, Roumen Brietzke, Elisa Can J Psychiatry Original Research OBJECTIVE: There is limited data about the impact of mood disorders treatment guidelines on clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of prescribers’ adherence to the 2018 Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) treatment guidelines recommendations on the readmission rates of patients hospitalized for mania. METHOD: A retrospective cohort of all individuals admitted due to acute mania to Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, from January 2018 to July 2021 was included in this study. Patient variables and data regarding index admission and subsequent hospitalizations were extracted from medical records up to December 31, 2021. Treatment regimens were classified as first-line, second-line, noncompliant, or no treatment. We explored the associations between treatment regimens and the risk of readmissions using univariate, multivariate, and survival analysis. RESULTS: We identified 211 hospitalizations related to 165 patients. The mean time-to-readmission was 211.8 days (standard deviation [SD]  =  247.1); the 30-day rehospitalization rate was 13.7%, and any rehospitalization rate was 40.3%. Compared to no treatment, only first-line treatments were associated with a statistically significant decreased risk of 30-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.209; 95% CI, 0.058 to 0.670). The risk of any readmission was reduced by first-line (OR = 0.387; 95% CI, 0.173 to 0.848) and noncompliant regimens (OR = 0.414; 95% CI, 0.174 to 0.982) compared to no treatment. On survival analysis, no treatment group was associated with shorter time-to-readmission (log-rank test, p  =  0.014) and increased risk of readmission (hazard ratio = 2.27; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.96) when compared to first-line medications. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with first-line medications was associated with lower 30-day rehospitalization rates and longer time-to-readmission. Physicians’ adherence to treatments with higher-ranked evidence for efficacy, safety, and tolerability may improve bipolar disorder outcomes. SAGE Publications 2023-02-21 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10411363/ /pubmed/37551100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07067437231156235 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gomes, Fabiano A.
Dumay, Henrique
Fagen, Julia
Palma, Natalie
Milev, Roumen
Brietzke, Elisa
Does the Ranking Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of the 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Treatment Recommendations for Acute Mania on Rehospitalization Rates
title Does the Ranking Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of the 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Treatment Recommendations for Acute Mania on Rehospitalization Rates
title_full Does the Ranking Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of the 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Treatment Recommendations for Acute Mania on Rehospitalization Rates
title_fullStr Does the Ranking Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of the 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Treatment Recommendations for Acute Mania on Rehospitalization Rates
title_full_unstemmed Does the Ranking Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of the 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Treatment Recommendations for Acute Mania on Rehospitalization Rates
title_short Does the Ranking Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study Investigating the Impact of the 2018 CANMAT and ISBD Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Treatment Recommendations for Acute Mania on Rehospitalization Rates
title_sort does the ranking matter? a retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of the 2018 canmat and isbd guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder treatment recommendations for acute mania on rehospitalization rates
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37551100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07067437231156235
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesfabianoa doestherankingmatteraretrospectivecohortstudyinvestigatingtheimpactofthe2018canmatandisbdguidelinesforthemanagementofpatientswithbipolardisordertreatmentrecommendationsforacutemaniaonrehospitalizationrates
AT dumayhenrique doestherankingmatteraretrospectivecohortstudyinvestigatingtheimpactofthe2018canmatandisbdguidelinesforthemanagementofpatientswithbipolardisordertreatmentrecommendationsforacutemaniaonrehospitalizationrates
AT fagenjulia doestherankingmatteraretrospectivecohortstudyinvestigatingtheimpactofthe2018canmatandisbdguidelinesforthemanagementofpatientswithbipolardisordertreatmentrecommendationsforacutemaniaonrehospitalizationrates
AT palmanatalie doestherankingmatteraretrospectivecohortstudyinvestigatingtheimpactofthe2018canmatandisbdguidelinesforthemanagementofpatientswithbipolardisordertreatmentrecommendationsforacutemaniaonrehospitalizationrates
AT milevroumen doestherankingmatteraretrospectivecohortstudyinvestigatingtheimpactofthe2018canmatandisbdguidelinesforthemanagementofpatientswithbipolardisordertreatmentrecommendationsforacutemaniaonrehospitalizationrates
AT brietzkeelisa doestherankingmatteraretrospectivecohortstudyinvestigatingtheimpactofthe2018canmatandisbdguidelinesforthemanagementofpatientswithbipolardisordertreatmentrecommendationsforacutemaniaonrehospitalizationrates