Cargando…

Biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats

INTRODUCTION: Recent work demonstrating reduction of aerosolized contamination via a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary antiseptics offers promise regarding health concerns associated with cross-contamination from working canines to humans. While mechanical reduction can be achieved via a w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perry, Erin B., Discepolo, Dakota R., Liang, Stephen Y., Scott, Maurnice, Williamson, Kyleigh, Bender, Kelly S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1219249
_version_ 1785086686848352256
author Perry, Erin B.
Discepolo, Dakota R.
Liang, Stephen Y.
Scott, Maurnice
Williamson, Kyleigh
Bender, Kelly S.
author_facet Perry, Erin B.
Discepolo, Dakota R.
Liang, Stephen Y.
Scott, Maurnice
Williamson, Kyleigh
Bender, Kelly S.
author_sort Perry, Erin B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent work demonstrating reduction of aerosolized contamination via a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary antiseptics offers promise regarding health concerns associated with cross-contamination from working canines to humans. While mechanical reduction can be achieved via a wipe-down procedure, the biocidal impact on flora within the exterior coat is unknown. METHODOLOGY: This study assessed the biocidal impact of antiseptics on the exterior bacterial community of the canine. Lint-free towels were saturated with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate scrub, or 7.5% povidone-iodine scrub diluted at a 1:4 ratio. Treatments were rotated across the dorsal aspect of kennel housed Foxhounds (n = 30). Sterile swabs were collected in triplicate prior to, and following wipe down, stored in Amies solution at 4°C, plated onto nutrient agar and reduction in colony forming units (CFU) was measured across both treatments. Statistical analysis utilizing PROC GLM examined effects of treatment (p ≤ 0.05). Molecular analysis of the 16S rRNA gene was completed for 3 hounds. RESULTS: Reduction in CFU was measured (p < 0.001) for both antiseptics. Qualitative molecular data indicated that both antiseptics had a biocidal effect on the dominant microbial community on the exterior coat with gram-positive, spore-forming taxa predominating post-treatment. CONCLUSION: Effective wipe-down strategies using common veterinary cleansers should be further investigated and incorporated to safeguard working canine health and prevent cross-contamination of human personnel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10411539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104115392023-08-10 Biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats Perry, Erin B. Discepolo, Dakota R. Liang, Stephen Y. Scott, Maurnice Williamson, Kyleigh Bender, Kelly S. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science INTRODUCTION: Recent work demonstrating reduction of aerosolized contamination via a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary antiseptics offers promise regarding health concerns associated with cross-contamination from working canines to humans. While mechanical reduction can be achieved via a wipe-down procedure, the biocidal impact on flora within the exterior coat is unknown. METHODOLOGY: This study assessed the biocidal impact of antiseptics on the exterior bacterial community of the canine. Lint-free towels were saturated with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate scrub, or 7.5% povidone-iodine scrub diluted at a 1:4 ratio. Treatments were rotated across the dorsal aspect of kennel housed Foxhounds (n = 30). Sterile swabs were collected in triplicate prior to, and following wipe down, stored in Amies solution at 4°C, plated onto nutrient agar and reduction in colony forming units (CFU) was measured across both treatments. Statistical analysis utilizing PROC GLM examined effects of treatment (p ≤ 0.05). Molecular analysis of the 16S rRNA gene was completed for 3 hounds. RESULTS: Reduction in CFU was measured (p < 0.001) for both antiseptics. Qualitative molecular data indicated that both antiseptics had a biocidal effect on the dominant microbial community on the exterior coat with gram-positive, spore-forming taxa predominating post-treatment. CONCLUSION: Effective wipe-down strategies using common veterinary cleansers should be further investigated and incorporated to safeguard working canine health and prevent cross-contamination of human personnel. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10411539/ /pubmed/37565083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1219249 Text en Copyright © 2023 Perry, Discepolo, Liang, Scott, Williamson and Bender. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Perry, Erin B.
Discepolo, Dakota R.
Liang, Stephen Y.
Scott, Maurnice
Williamson, Kyleigh
Bender, Kelly S.
Biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats
title Biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats
title_full Biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats
title_fullStr Biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats
title_full_unstemmed Biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats
title_short Biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats
title_sort biocidal effects of a wipe-down procedure using common veterinary cleansers on microbial burden within working canine exterior coats
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1219249
work_keys_str_mv AT perryerinb biocidaleffectsofawipedownprocedureusingcommonveterinarycleansersonmicrobialburdenwithinworkingcanineexteriorcoats
AT discepolodakotar biocidaleffectsofawipedownprocedureusingcommonveterinarycleansersonmicrobialburdenwithinworkingcanineexteriorcoats
AT liangstepheny biocidaleffectsofawipedownprocedureusingcommonveterinarycleansersonmicrobialburdenwithinworkingcanineexteriorcoats
AT scottmaurnice biocidaleffectsofawipedownprocedureusingcommonveterinarycleansersonmicrobialburdenwithinworkingcanineexteriorcoats
AT williamsonkyleigh biocidaleffectsofawipedownprocedureusingcommonveterinarycleansersonmicrobialburdenwithinworkingcanineexteriorcoats
AT benderkellys biocidaleffectsofawipedownprocedureusingcommonveterinarycleansersonmicrobialburdenwithinworkingcanineexteriorcoats