Cargando…

Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts

The seminal theory of motivational conflicts distinguishes between approach–approach (AP-AP) conflicts, in which a decision is made between desirable alternatives, and avoidance–avoidance (AV-AV) conflicts, in which a decision is made between undesirable alternatives. The behavioral differences betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levy, Ariel, Enisman, Maya, Perry, Anat, Kleiman, Tali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad038
_version_ 1785086719928827904
author Levy, Ariel
Enisman, Maya
Perry, Anat
Kleiman, Tali
author_facet Levy, Ariel
Enisman, Maya
Perry, Anat
Kleiman, Tali
author_sort Levy, Ariel
collection PubMed
description The seminal theory of motivational conflicts distinguishes between approach–approach (AP-AP) conflicts, in which a decision is made between desirable alternatives, and avoidance–avoidance (AV-AV) conflicts, in which a decision is made between undesirable alternatives. The behavioral differences between AP-AP and AV-AV conflicts are well documented: abundant research showed that AV-AV conflicts are more difficult to resolve than AP-AP ones. However, there is little to no research looking into the neural underpinnings of the differences between the two conflict types. Here, we show that midfrontal theta, an established neural marker of conflict, distinguished between the two conflict types such that midfrontal theta power was higher in AV-AV conflicts than in AP-AP conflicts. We further demonstrate that higher midfrontal theta power was associated with shorter decision times on a single-trial basis, indicating that midfrontal theta played a role in promoting successful controlled behavior. Taken together, our results show that AP-AP and AV-AV conflicts are distinguishable on the neural level. The implications of these results go beyond motivational conflicts, as they establish midfrontal theta as a measure of the continuous degree of conflict in subjective decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10411683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104116832023-08-10 Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts Levy, Ariel Enisman, Maya Perry, Anat Kleiman, Tali Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript The seminal theory of motivational conflicts distinguishes between approach–approach (AP-AP) conflicts, in which a decision is made between desirable alternatives, and avoidance–avoidance (AV-AV) conflicts, in which a decision is made between undesirable alternatives. The behavioral differences between AP-AP and AV-AV conflicts are well documented: abundant research showed that AV-AV conflicts are more difficult to resolve than AP-AP ones. However, there is little to no research looking into the neural underpinnings of the differences between the two conflict types. Here, we show that midfrontal theta, an established neural marker of conflict, distinguished between the two conflict types such that midfrontal theta power was higher in AV-AV conflicts than in AP-AP conflicts. We further demonstrate that higher midfrontal theta power was associated with shorter decision times on a single-trial basis, indicating that midfrontal theta played a role in promoting successful controlled behavior. Taken together, our results show that AP-AP and AV-AV conflicts are distinguishable on the neural level. The implications of these results go beyond motivational conflicts, as they establish midfrontal theta as a measure of the continuous degree of conflict in subjective decisions. Oxford University Press 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10411683/ /pubmed/37493061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad038 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Levy, Ariel
Enisman, Maya
Perry, Anat
Kleiman, Tali
Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts
title Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts
title_full Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts
title_fullStr Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts
title_full_unstemmed Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts
title_short Midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts
title_sort midfrontal theta as an index of conflict strength in approach–approach vs avoidance–avoidance conflicts
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37493061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad038
work_keys_str_mv AT levyariel midfrontalthetaasanindexofconflictstrengthinapproachapproachvsavoidanceavoidanceconflicts
AT enismanmaya midfrontalthetaasanindexofconflictstrengthinapproachapproachvsavoidanceavoidanceconflicts
AT perryanat midfrontalthetaasanindexofconflictstrengthinapproachapproachvsavoidanceavoidanceconflicts
AT kleimantali midfrontalthetaasanindexofconflictstrengthinapproachapproachvsavoidanceavoidanceconflicts