Cargando…

Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lalanza, Jaume F., Lorente, Sonia, Bullich, Raimon, García, Carlos, Losilla, Josep-Maria, Capdevila, Lluis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10412682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6
_version_ 1785086966417588224
author Lalanza, Jaume F.
Lorente, Sonia
Bullich, Raimon
García, Carlos
Losilla, Josep-Maria
Capdevila, Lluis
author_facet Lalanza, Jaume F.
Lorente, Sonia
Bullich, Raimon
García, Carlos
Losilla, Josep-Maria
Capdevila, Lluis
author_sort Lalanza, Jaume F.
collection PubMed
description Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) “Optimal RF” (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) “Individual RF” (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) “Preset-pace RF” (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10412682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104126822023-08-11 Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines Lalanza, Jaume F. Lorente, Sonia Bullich, Raimon García, Carlos Losilla, Josep-Maria Capdevila, Lluis Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) “Optimal RF” (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) “Individual RF” (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) “Preset-pace RF” (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6. Springer US 2023-03-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10412682/ /pubmed/36917418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lalanza, Jaume F.
Lorente, Sonia
Bullich, Raimon
García, Carlos
Losilla, Josep-Maria
Capdevila, Lluis
Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines
title Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines
title_full Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines
title_fullStr Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines
title_short Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines
title_sort methods for heart rate variability biofeedback (hrvb): a systematic review and guidelines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10412682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lalanzajaumef methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines
AT lorentesonia methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines
AT bullichraimon methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines
AT garciacarlos methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines
AT losillajosepmaria methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines
AT capdevilalluis methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines