Cargando…
Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10412682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6 |
_version_ | 1785086966417588224 |
---|---|
author | Lalanza, Jaume F. Lorente, Sonia Bullich, Raimon García, Carlos Losilla, Josep-Maria Capdevila, Lluis |
author_facet | Lalanza, Jaume F. Lorente, Sonia Bullich, Raimon García, Carlos Losilla, Josep-Maria Capdevila, Lluis |
author_sort | Lalanza, Jaume F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) “Optimal RF” (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) “Individual RF” (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) “Preset-pace RF” (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10412682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104126822023-08-11 Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines Lalanza, Jaume F. Lorente, Sonia Bullich, Raimon García, Carlos Losilla, Josep-Maria Capdevila, Lluis Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Article Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual’s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) “Optimal RF” (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) “Individual RF” (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) “Preset-pace RF” (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6. Springer US 2023-03-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10412682/ /pubmed/36917418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Lalanza, Jaume F. Lorente, Sonia Bullich, Raimon García, Carlos Losilla, Josep-Maria Capdevila, Lluis Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines |
title | Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines |
title_full | Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines |
title_fullStr | Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines |
title_short | Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines |
title_sort | methods for heart rate variability biofeedback (hrvb): a systematic review and guidelines |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10412682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lalanzajaumef methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines AT lorentesonia methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines AT bullichraimon methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines AT garciacarlos methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines AT losillajosepmaria methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines AT capdevilalluis methodsforheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackhrvbasystematicreviewandguidelines |