Cargando…

Can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? A study among US young adults

Despite being a major threat to health, vaccine hesitancy (i.e., refusal or reluctance to vaccinate despite vaccine availability) is on the rise. Using a longitudinal cohort of young adults (N = 1260) from Los Angeles County, California we investigated the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying COVID...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freitas-Lemos, Roberta, Tomlinson, Devin C., Yeh, Yu-Hua, Dwyer, Candice L., Dai, Hongying Daisy, Leventhal, Adam, Tegge, Allison N., Bickel, Warren K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102280
_version_ 1785087076239147008
author Freitas-Lemos, Roberta
Tomlinson, Devin C.
Yeh, Yu-Hua
Dwyer, Candice L.
Dai, Hongying Daisy
Leventhal, Adam
Tegge, Allison N.
Bickel, Warren K.
author_facet Freitas-Lemos, Roberta
Tomlinson, Devin C.
Yeh, Yu-Hua
Dwyer, Candice L.
Dai, Hongying Daisy
Leventhal, Adam
Tegge, Allison N.
Bickel, Warren K.
author_sort Freitas-Lemos, Roberta
collection PubMed
description Despite being a major threat to health, vaccine hesitancy (i.e., refusal or reluctance to vaccinate despite vaccine availability) is on the rise. Using a longitudinal cohort of young adults (N = 1260) from Los Angeles County, California we investigated the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Data were collected at two time points: during adolescence (12th grade; fall 2016; average age = 16.96 (±0.42)) and during young adulthood (spring 2021; average age = 21.33 (±0.49)). Main outcomes and measures were delay discounting (DD; fall 2016) and tendency to act rashly when experiencing positive and negative emotions (UPPS-P; fall 2016); self-reported vaccine hesitancy and vaccine beliefs/knowledge (spring 2021). A principal components analysis determined four COVID-19 vaccine beliefs/knowledge themes: Collective Responsibility, Confidence and Risk Calculation, Complacency, and Convenience. Significant relationships were found between themes, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and DD. Collective Responsibility (β = -1.158[-1.213,-1.102]) and Convenience (β = -0.132[-0.185,-0.078]) scores were negatively associated, while Confidence and Risk Calculation (β = 0.283[0.230,0.337]) and Complacency (β = 0.412[0.358,0.466]) scores were positively associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Additionally, Collective Responsibility (β = -0.060[-0.101,-0.018]) was negatively associated, and Complacency (β = -0.063[0.021,0.105]) was positively associated with DD from fall 2016. Mediation analysis revealed immediacy bias during adolescence, measured by DD, predicted vaccine hesitancy 4 years later while being mediated by two types of vaccine beliefs/knowledge: Collective Responsibility (β = 0.069[0.022,0.116]) and Complacency (β = 0.026[0.008,0.044]). These findings provide a further understanding of individual vaccine-related decision-making among young adults and inform public health messaging to increase vaccination acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10413160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104131602023-08-11 Can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? A study among US young adults Freitas-Lemos, Roberta Tomlinson, Devin C. Yeh, Yu-Hua Dwyer, Candice L. Dai, Hongying Daisy Leventhal, Adam Tegge, Allison N. Bickel, Warren K. Prev Med Rep Regular Article Despite being a major threat to health, vaccine hesitancy (i.e., refusal or reluctance to vaccinate despite vaccine availability) is on the rise. Using a longitudinal cohort of young adults (N = 1260) from Los Angeles County, California we investigated the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Data were collected at two time points: during adolescence (12th grade; fall 2016; average age = 16.96 (±0.42)) and during young adulthood (spring 2021; average age = 21.33 (±0.49)). Main outcomes and measures were delay discounting (DD; fall 2016) and tendency to act rashly when experiencing positive and negative emotions (UPPS-P; fall 2016); self-reported vaccine hesitancy and vaccine beliefs/knowledge (spring 2021). A principal components analysis determined four COVID-19 vaccine beliefs/knowledge themes: Collective Responsibility, Confidence and Risk Calculation, Complacency, and Convenience. Significant relationships were found between themes, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and DD. Collective Responsibility (β = -1.158[-1.213,-1.102]) and Convenience (β = -0.132[-0.185,-0.078]) scores were negatively associated, while Confidence and Risk Calculation (β = 0.283[0.230,0.337]) and Complacency (β = 0.412[0.358,0.466]) scores were positively associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Additionally, Collective Responsibility (β = -0.060[-0.101,-0.018]) was negatively associated, and Complacency (β = -0.063[0.021,0.105]) was positively associated with DD from fall 2016. Mediation analysis revealed immediacy bias during adolescence, measured by DD, predicted vaccine hesitancy 4 years later while being mediated by two types of vaccine beliefs/knowledge: Collective Responsibility (β = 0.069[0.022,0.116]) and Complacency (β = 0.026[0.008,0.044]). These findings provide a further understanding of individual vaccine-related decision-making among young adults and inform public health messaging to increase vaccination acceptance. 2023-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10413160/ /pubmed/37576839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102280 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Freitas-Lemos, Roberta
Tomlinson, Devin C.
Yeh, Yu-Hua
Dwyer, Candice L.
Dai, Hongying Daisy
Leventhal, Adam
Tegge, Allison N.
Bickel, Warren K.
Can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? A study among US young adults
title Can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? A study among US young adults
title_full Can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? A study among US young adults
title_fullStr Can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? A study among US young adults
title_full_unstemmed Can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? A study among US young adults
title_short Can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? A study among US young adults
title_sort can delay discounting predict vaccine hesitancy 4-years later? a study among us young adults
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102280
work_keys_str_mv AT freitaslemosroberta candelaydiscountingpredictvaccinehesitancy4yearslaterastudyamongusyoungadults
AT tomlinsondevinc candelaydiscountingpredictvaccinehesitancy4yearslaterastudyamongusyoungadults
AT yehyuhua candelaydiscountingpredictvaccinehesitancy4yearslaterastudyamongusyoungadults
AT dwyercandicel candelaydiscountingpredictvaccinehesitancy4yearslaterastudyamongusyoungadults
AT daihongyingdaisy candelaydiscountingpredictvaccinehesitancy4yearslaterastudyamongusyoungadults
AT leventhaladam candelaydiscountingpredictvaccinehesitancy4yearslaterastudyamongusyoungadults
AT teggeallisonn candelaydiscountingpredictvaccinehesitancy4yearslaterastudyamongusyoungadults
AT bickelwarrenk candelaydiscountingpredictvaccinehesitancy4yearslaterastudyamongusyoungadults