Cargando…

Experimental Study on the Effect of CO(2) Injection Pressure on the Migration Characteristics and Extraction Effects of Replacement CH(4)

[Image: see text] To study the effect of CO(2) injection pressure on gas migration characteristics and coalbed methane (CBM) extraction, a platform for the experimental replacement of CH(4) with CO(2) was used to conduct experiments on the replacement of CH(4) under different CO(2) injection pressur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Zhihao, Jia, Baoshan, Wang, Yanming, Tian, Weipeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03016
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] To study the effect of CO(2) injection pressure on gas migration characteristics and coalbed methane (CBM) extraction, a platform for the experimental replacement of CH(4) with CO(2) was used to conduct experiments on the replacement of CH(4) under different CO(2) injection pressures and analyze the gas transport characteristics and CH(4) extraction during the experiment. The results reveal that the rate of gas migration out of the coal seam accelerates with increasing gas injection pressure, as determined by comparisons of the migration rates between adjacent monitoring points. The change trend of the CH(4) desorption rate under different gas injection pressures is divided into slow decline, sharp decline, and stability stages, and the maximum value of the effective diffusion coefficient increases from 2.3 × 10(–5) to 3.4 × 10(–5) and 4.6 × 10(–5) cm(2)/s as the gas injection pressure increases from 0.6 to 0.8 and 1.0 MPa. Similarly, the change pattern of coal seam permeability can be divided into slow decline, sharp decline, and stability stages. After the gas injection pressure was increased from 0.6 to 0.8 and 1.0 MPa, the CH(4) desorption volume increased from 90.2 to 94.1 and 97.8 L, whereas the coal seam CO(2) sequestration volume increased from 269.2 to 274.2 and 322.8 L, respectively. In contrast, the CH(4) extraction efficiency increased from 76.9 to 80.2 and 82.9%, respectively. The research results have important reference value and practical significance for optimizing the CO(2) injection pressure and improving the CBM extraction.