Cargando…
Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service
BACKGROUND: Developed in 2019, the Community Rapid Intervention Service (CRIS) is a community intervention service aiming to prevent hospital admissions. CRIS provides a response within two hours to patients with sub-acute medical needs in their usual place of residence. This evaluation aimed to ide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09864-z |
_version_ | 1785087146963501056 |
---|---|
author | Moult, Alice Baker, Dereth Twohig, Helen Missen, Matthew Iqbal, Zafar Duffy, Helen Paskins, Zoe |
author_facet | Moult, Alice Baker, Dereth Twohig, Helen Missen, Matthew Iqbal, Zafar Duffy, Helen Paskins, Zoe |
author_sort | Moult, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Developed in 2019, the Community Rapid Intervention Service (CRIS) is a community intervention service aiming to prevent hospital admissions. CRIS provides a response within two hours to patients with sub-acute medical needs in their usual place of residence. This evaluation aimed to identify challenges and facilitators to implementation of the service, with a view to informing future service development, optimising patient care and disseminating learning to other areas looking to implement similar services. METHODS: This study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as an evaluation framework. We conducted semi-structured interviews with local healthcare system leaders, clinicians that worked within the CRIS, and clinicians who interfaced with the CRIS. The CFIR was used to guide data collection and analysis. Two Community of Practice (CoP) meetings were held to gather stakeholders’ perspectives of the evaluation. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified from the analysis of 13 interviews: contextual factors influencing implementation, service identity and navigating complexity. Contextual factors such the influence of the Covid 19 pandemic upon health services and the expansion of the CRIS were discussed by participants. The adaptability of the service was deemed both a facilitator and challenge of implementation. Ways to build-on and improve the existing CRIS model were suggested. CONCLUSION: This evaluation has shown that the CRIS may need to be redefined with clarity provided as to how the service interfaces with other urgent and planned care offered in acute, primary, community and social services. Structuring the evaluation around the CFIR was helpful in identifying facilitators and challenges that influenced the implementation of the CRIS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09864-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10413526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104135262023-08-11 Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service Moult, Alice Baker, Dereth Twohig, Helen Missen, Matthew Iqbal, Zafar Duffy, Helen Paskins, Zoe BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Developed in 2019, the Community Rapid Intervention Service (CRIS) is a community intervention service aiming to prevent hospital admissions. CRIS provides a response within two hours to patients with sub-acute medical needs in their usual place of residence. This evaluation aimed to identify challenges and facilitators to implementation of the service, with a view to informing future service development, optimising patient care and disseminating learning to other areas looking to implement similar services. METHODS: This study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as an evaluation framework. We conducted semi-structured interviews with local healthcare system leaders, clinicians that worked within the CRIS, and clinicians who interfaced with the CRIS. The CFIR was used to guide data collection and analysis. Two Community of Practice (CoP) meetings were held to gather stakeholders’ perspectives of the evaluation. RESULTS: Three key themes were identified from the analysis of 13 interviews: contextual factors influencing implementation, service identity and navigating complexity. Contextual factors such the influence of the Covid 19 pandemic upon health services and the expansion of the CRIS were discussed by participants. The adaptability of the service was deemed both a facilitator and challenge of implementation. Ways to build-on and improve the existing CRIS model were suggested. CONCLUSION: This evaluation has shown that the CRIS may need to be redefined with clarity provided as to how the service interfaces with other urgent and planned care offered in acute, primary, community and social services. Structuring the evaluation around the CFIR was helpful in identifying facilitators and challenges that influenced the implementation of the CRIS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09864-z. BioMed Central 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10413526/ /pubmed/37559064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09864-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Moult, Alice Baker, Dereth Twohig, Helen Missen, Matthew Iqbal, Zafar Duffy, Helen Paskins, Zoe Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service |
title | Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service |
title_full | Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service |
title_fullStr | Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service |
title_short | Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service |
title_sort | applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09864-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moultalice applyingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchtoevaluatethecommunityrapidinterventionservice AT bakerdereth applyingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchtoevaluatethecommunityrapidinterventionservice AT twohighelen applyingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchtoevaluatethecommunityrapidinterventionservice AT missenmatthew applyingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchtoevaluatethecommunityrapidinterventionservice AT iqbalzafar applyingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchtoevaluatethecommunityrapidinterventionservice AT duffyhelen applyingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchtoevaluatethecommunityrapidinterventionservice AT paskinszoe applyingtheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchtoevaluatethecommunityrapidinterventionservice |