Cargando…
Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common acute complications of blood donation. Responsible for substantial morbidity, they also reduce the likelihood of repeated donations and are disruptive and costly for blood services. Although blood establishments worldwide have adopted differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z |
_version_ | 1785087162259079168 |
---|---|
author | McMahon, Amy Kaptoge, Stephen Walker, Matthew Mehenny, Susan Gilchrist, Philippe T Sambrook, Jennifer Akhtar, Naim Sweeting, Michael Wood, Angela M Stirrups, Kathleen Chung, Ryan Fahle, Sarah Johnson, Elisha Cullen, Donna Godfrey, Rosemary Duthie, Shannon Allen, Louise Harvey, Paul Berkson, Michael Allen, Elizabeth Watkins, Nicholas A Bradley, John R Kingston, Nathalie Miflin, Gail Armitage, Jane Roberts, David J Danesh, John Di Angelantonio, Emanuele |
author_facet | McMahon, Amy Kaptoge, Stephen Walker, Matthew Mehenny, Susan Gilchrist, Philippe T Sambrook, Jennifer Akhtar, Naim Sweeting, Michael Wood, Angela M Stirrups, Kathleen Chung, Ryan Fahle, Sarah Johnson, Elisha Cullen, Donna Godfrey, Rosemary Duthie, Shannon Allen, Louise Harvey, Paul Berkson, Michael Allen, Elizabeth Watkins, Nicholas A Bradley, John R Kingston, Nathalie Miflin, Gail Armitage, Jane Roberts, David J Danesh, John Di Angelantonio, Emanuele |
author_sort | McMahon, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common acute complications of blood donation. Responsible for substantial morbidity, they also reduce the likelihood of repeated donations and are disruptive and costly for blood services. Although blood establishments worldwide have adopted different strategies to prevent VVRs (including water loading and applied muscle tension [AMT]), robust evidence is limited. The Strategies to Improve Donor Experiences (STRIDES) trial aims to reliably assess the impact of four different interventions to prevent VVRs among blood donors. METHODS: STRIDES is a cluster-randomised cross-over/stepped-wedge factorial trial of four interventions to reduce VVRs involving about 1.4 million whole blood donors enrolled from all 73 blood donation sites (mobile teams and donor centres) of National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) in England. Each site (“cluster”) has been randomly allocated to receive one or more interventions during a 36-month period, using principles of cross-over, stepped-wedge and factorial trial design to assign the sequence of interventions. Each of the four interventions is compared to NHSBT’s current practices: (i) 500-ml isotonic drink before donation (vs current 500-ml plain water); (ii) 3-min rest on donation chair after donation (vs current 2 min); (iii) new modified AMT (vs current practice of AMT); and (iv) psychosocial intervention using preparatory materials (vs current practice of nothing). The primary outcome is the number of in-session VVRs with loss of consciousness (i.e. episodes involving loss of consciousness of any duration, with or without additional complications). Secondary outcomes include all in-session VVRs (i.e. with and without loss of consciousness), all delayed VVRs (i.e. those occurring after leaving the venue) and any in-session non-VVR adverse events or reactions. DISCUSSION: The STRIDES trial should yield novel information about interventions, singly and in combination, for the prevention of VVRs, with the aim of generating policy-shaping evidence to help inform blood services to improve donor health, donor experience, and service efficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 10412338. Registration date: October 24, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10413586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104135862023-08-11 Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial McMahon, Amy Kaptoge, Stephen Walker, Matthew Mehenny, Susan Gilchrist, Philippe T Sambrook, Jennifer Akhtar, Naim Sweeting, Michael Wood, Angela M Stirrups, Kathleen Chung, Ryan Fahle, Sarah Johnson, Elisha Cullen, Donna Godfrey, Rosemary Duthie, Shannon Allen, Louise Harvey, Paul Berkson, Michael Allen, Elizabeth Watkins, Nicholas A Bradley, John R Kingston, Nathalie Miflin, Gail Armitage, Jane Roberts, David J Danesh, John Di Angelantonio, Emanuele Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common acute complications of blood donation. Responsible for substantial morbidity, they also reduce the likelihood of repeated donations and are disruptive and costly for blood services. Although blood establishments worldwide have adopted different strategies to prevent VVRs (including water loading and applied muscle tension [AMT]), robust evidence is limited. The Strategies to Improve Donor Experiences (STRIDES) trial aims to reliably assess the impact of four different interventions to prevent VVRs among blood donors. METHODS: STRIDES is a cluster-randomised cross-over/stepped-wedge factorial trial of four interventions to reduce VVRs involving about 1.4 million whole blood donors enrolled from all 73 blood donation sites (mobile teams and donor centres) of National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) in England. Each site (“cluster”) has been randomly allocated to receive one or more interventions during a 36-month period, using principles of cross-over, stepped-wedge and factorial trial design to assign the sequence of interventions. Each of the four interventions is compared to NHSBT’s current practices: (i) 500-ml isotonic drink before donation (vs current 500-ml plain water); (ii) 3-min rest on donation chair after donation (vs current 2 min); (iii) new modified AMT (vs current practice of AMT); and (iv) psychosocial intervention using preparatory materials (vs current practice of nothing). The primary outcome is the number of in-session VVRs with loss of consciousness (i.e. episodes involving loss of consciousness of any duration, with or without additional complications). Secondary outcomes include all in-session VVRs (i.e. with and without loss of consciousness), all delayed VVRs (i.e. those occurring after leaving the venue) and any in-session non-VVR adverse events or reactions. DISCUSSION: The STRIDES trial should yield novel information about interventions, singly and in combination, for the prevention of VVRs, with the aim of generating policy-shaping evidence to help inform blood services to improve donor health, donor experience, and service efficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 10412338. Registration date: October 24, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z. BioMed Central 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10413586/ /pubmed/37563721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol McMahon, Amy Kaptoge, Stephen Walker, Matthew Mehenny, Susan Gilchrist, Philippe T Sambrook, Jennifer Akhtar, Naim Sweeting, Michael Wood, Angela M Stirrups, Kathleen Chung, Ryan Fahle, Sarah Johnson, Elisha Cullen, Donna Godfrey, Rosemary Duthie, Shannon Allen, Louise Harvey, Paul Berkson, Michael Allen, Elizabeth Watkins, Nicholas A Bradley, John R Kingston, Nathalie Miflin, Gail Armitage, Jane Roberts, David J Danesh, John Di Angelantonio, Emanuele Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial |
title | Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial |
title_full | Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial |
title_short | Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial |
title_sort | evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmahonamy evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT kaptogestephen evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT walkermatthew evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT mehennysusan evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT gilchristphilippet evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT sambrookjennifer evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT akhtarnaim evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT sweetingmichael evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT woodangelam evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT stirrupskathleen evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT chungryan evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT fahlesarah evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT johnsonelisha evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT cullendonna evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT godfreyrosemary evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT duthieshannon evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT allenlouise evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT harveypaul evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT berksonmichael evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT allenelizabeth evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT watkinsnicholasa evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT bradleyjohnr evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT kingstonnathalie evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT miflingail evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT armitagejane evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT robertsdavidj evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT daneshjohn evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial AT diangelantonioemanuele evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial |