Cargando…

Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common acute complications of blood donation. Responsible for substantial morbidity, they also reduce the likelihood of repeated donations and are disruptive and costly for blood services. Although blood establishments worldwide have adopted differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMahon, Amy, Kaptoge, Stephen, Walker, Matthew, Mehenny, Susan, Gilchrist, Philippe T, Sambrook, Jennifer, Akhtar, Naim, Sweeting, Michael, Wood, Angela M, Stirrups, Kathleen, Chung, Ryan, Fahle, Sarah, Johnson, Elisha, Cullen, Donna, Godfrey, Rosemary, Duthie, Shannon, Allen, Louise, Harvey, Paul, Berkson, Michael, Allen, Elizabeth, Watkins, Nicholas A, Bradley, John R, Kingston, Nathalie, Miflin, Gail, Armitage, Jane, Roberts, David J, Danesh, John, Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z
_version_ 1785087162259079168
author McMahon, Amy
Kaptoge, Stephen
Walker, Matthew
Mehenny, Susan
Gilchrist, Philippe T
Sambrook, Jennifer
Akhtar, Naim
Sweeting, Michael
Wood, Angela M
Stirrups, Kathleen
Chung, Ryan
Fahle, Sarah
Johnson, Elisha
Cullen, Donna
Godfrey, Rosemary
Duthie, Shannon
Allen, Louise
Harvey, Paul
Berkson, Michael
Allen, Elizabeth
Watkins, Nicholas A
Bradley, John R
Kingston, Nathalie
Miflin, Gail
Armitage, Jane
Roberts, David J
Danesh, John
Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
author_facet McMahon, Amy
Kaptoge, Stephen
Walker, Matthew
Mehenny, Susan
Gilchrist, Philippe T
Sambrook, Jennifer
Akhtar, Naim
Sweeting, Michael
Wood, Angela M
Stirrups, Kathleen
Chung, Ryan
Fahle, Sarah
Johnson, Elisha
Cullen, Donna
Godfrey, Rosemary
Duthie, Shannon
Allen, Louise
Harvey, Paul
Berkson, Michael
Allen, Elizabeth
Watkins, Nicholas A
Bradley, John R
Kingston, Nathalie
Miflin, Gail
Armitage, Jane
Roberts, David J
Danesh, John
Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
author_sort McMahon, Amy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common acute complications of blood donation. Responsible for substantial morbidity, they also reduce the likelihood of repeated donations and are disruptive and costly for blood services. Although blood establishments worldwide have adopted different strategies to prevent VVRs (including water loading and applied muscle tension [AMT]), robust evidence is limited. The Strategies to Improve Donor Experiences (STRIDES) trial aims to reliably assess the impact of four different interventions to prevent VVRs among blood donors. METHODS: STRIDES is a cluster-randomised cross-over/stepped-wedge factorial trial of four interventions to reduce VVRs involving about 1.4 million whole blood donors enrolled from all 73 blood donation sites (mobile teams and donor centres) of National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) in England. Each site (“cluster”) has been randomly allocated to receive one or more interventions during a 36-month period, using principles of cross-over, stepped-wedge and factorial trial design to assign the sequence of interventions. Each of the four interventions is compared to NHSBT’s current practices: (i) 500-ml isotonic drink before donation (vs current 500-ml plain water); (ii) 3-min rest on donation chair after donation (vs current 2 min); (iii) new modified AMT (vs current practice of AMT); and (iv) psychosocial intervention using preparatory materials (vs current practice of nothing). The primary outcome is the number of in-session VVRs with loss of consciousness (i.e. episodes involving loss of consciousness of any duration, with or without additional complications). Secondary outcomes include all in-session VVRs (i.e. with and without loss of consciousness), all delayed VVRs (i.e. those occurring after leaving the venue) and any in-session non-VVR adverse events or reactions. DISCUSSION: The STRIDES trial should yield novel information about interventions, singly and in combination, for the prevention of VVRs, with the aim of generating policy-shaping evidence to help inform blood services to improve donor health, donor experience, and service efficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 10412338. Registration date: October 24, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10413586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104135862023-08-11 Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial McMahon, Amy Kaptoge, Stephen Walker, Matthew Mehenny, Susan Gilchrist, Philippe T Sambrook, Jennifer Akhtar, Naim Sweeting, Michael Wood, Angela M Stirrups, Kathleen Chung, Ryan Fahle, Sarah Johnson, Elisha Cullen, Donna Godfrey, Rosemary Duthie, Shannon Allen, Louise Harvey, Paul Berkson, Michael Allen, Elizabeth Watkins, Nicholas A Bradley, John R Kingston, Nathalie Miflin, Gail Armitage, Jane Roberts, David J Danesh, John Di Angelantonio, Emanuele Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common acute complications of blood donation. Responsible for substantial morbidity, they also reduce the likelihood of repeated donations and are disruptive and costly for blood services. Although blood establishments worldwide have adopted different strategies to prevent VVRs (including water loading and applied muscle tension [AMT]), robust evidence is limited. The Strategies to Improve Donor Experiences (STRIDES) trial aims to reliably assess the impact of four different interventions to prevent VVRs among blood donors. METHODS: STRIDES is a cluster-randomised cross-over/stepped-wedge factorial trial of four interventions to reduce VVRs involving about 1.4 million whole blood donors enrolled from all 73 blood donation sites (mobile teams and donor centres) of National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) in England. Each site (“cluster”) has been randomly allocated to receive one or more interventions during a 36-month period, using principles of cross-over, stepped-wedge and factorial trial design to assign the sequence of interventions. Each of the four interventions is compared to NHSBT’s current practices: (i) 500-ml isotonic drink before donation (vs current 500-ml plain water); (ii) 3-min rest on donation chair after donation (vs current 2 min); (iii) new modified AMT (vs current practice of AMT); and (iv) psychosocial intervention using preparatory materials (vs current practice of nothing). The primary outcome is the number of in-session VVRs with loss of consciousness (i.e. episodes involving loss of consciousness of any duration, with or without additional complications). Secondary outcomes include all in-session VVRs (i.e. with and without loss of consciousness), all delayed VVRs (i.e. those occurring after leaving the venue) and any in-session non-VVR adverse events or reactions. DISCUSSION: The STRIDES trial should yield novel information about interventions, singly and in combination, for the prevention of VVRs, with the aim of generating policy-shaping evidence to help inform blood services to improve donor health, donor experience, and service efficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 10412338. Registration date: October 24, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z. BioMed Central 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10413586/ /pubmed/37563721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
McMahon, Amy
Kaptoge, Stephen
Walker, Matthew
Mehenny, Susan
Gilchrist, Philippe T
Sambrook, Jennifer
Akhtar, Naim
Sweeting, Michael
Wood, Angela M
Stirrups, Kathleen
Chung, Ryan
Fahle, Sarah
Johnson, Elisha
Cullen, Donna
Godfrey, Rosemary
Duthie, Shannon
Allen, Louise
Harvey, Paul
Berkson, Michael
Allen, Elizabeth
Watkins, Nicholas A
Bradley, John R
Kingston, Nathalie
Miflin, Gail
Armitage, Jane
Roberts, David J
Danesh, John
Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
title Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
title_full Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
title_short Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
title_sort evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmahonamy evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kaptogestephen evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT walkermatthew evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT mehennysusan evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT gilchristphilippet evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT sambrookjennifer evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT akhtarnaim evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT sweetingmichael evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT woodangelam evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT stirrupskathleen evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT chungryan evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT fahlesarah evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT johnsonelisha evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT cullendonna evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT godfreyrosemary evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT duthieshannon evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT allenlouise evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT harveypaul evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT berksonmichael evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT allenelizabeth evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT watkinsnicholasa evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT bradleyjohnr evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kingstonnathalie evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT miflingail evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT armitagejane evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT robertsdavidj evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT daneshjohn evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial
AT diangelantonioemanuele evaluationofinterventionstopreventvasovagalreactionsamongwholeblooddonorsrationaleanddesignofalargeclusterrandomisedtrial