Cargando…

Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: The selection and description of participants in clinical trials enables health care providers to determine generalizability of findings to the populations they serve. Limited diversity of participants in trials restricts evidence-based decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To determine the exten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finlayson, Marcia, Al-Mashita, Leyan, Sandhu, Rebekah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37555491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585231189670
_version_ 1785087203471261696
author Finlayson, Marcia
Al-Mashita, Leyan
Sandhu, Rebekah
author_facet Finlayson, Marcia
Al-Mashita, Leyan
Sandhu, Rebekah
author_sort Finlayson, Marcia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The selection and description of participants in clinical trials enables health care providers to determine generalizability of findings to the populations they serve. Limited diversity of participants in trials restricts evidence-based decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which diverse participants are being included in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of MS rehabilitation trials published since January 2002 using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. Article selection required randomized control design, a rehabilitation intervention, and a functional status outcome. Data extracted included details of intervention(s), outcomes, and participant selection and description using a social determinants of health framework. RESULT: A total of 243 studies were included. Exercise interventions and impairment-focused outcomes were most common. Most studies used only a MS Clinic for recruitment. Common exclusion criteria were physical or mental comorbidities, disability, age, and cognitive impairment. Participant age and sex were reported for almost all trials; reporting of other social determinants of health was atypical. CONCLUSION: MS rehabilitation trials have used limited recruitment methods, restricted samples, and reported few participant descriptors. Changes are required to enhance participant diversity and the descriptions of participant characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10413778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104137782023-08-11 Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review Finlayson, Marcia Al-Mashita, Leyan Sandhu, Rebekah Mult Scler Meeting Reviews BACKGROUND: The selection and description of participants in clinical trials enables health care providers to determine generalizability of findings to the populations they serve. Limited diversity of participants in trials restricts evidence-based decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which diverse participants are being included in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of MS rehabilitation trials published since January 2002 using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. Article selection required randomized control design, a rehabilitation intervention, and a functional status outcome. Data extracted included details of intervention(s), outcomes, and participant selection and description using a social determinants of health framework. RESULT: A total of 243 studies were included. Exercise interventions and impairment-focused outcomes were most common. Most studies used only a MS Clinic for recruitment. Common exclusion criteria were physical or mental comorbidities, disability, age, and cognitive impairment. Participant age and sex were reported for almost all trials; reporting of other social determinants of health was atypical. CONCLUSION: MS rehabilitation trials have used limited recruitment methods, restricted samples, and reported few participant descriptors. Changes are required to enhance participant diversity and the descriptions of participant characteristics. SAGE Publications 2023-08-09 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10413778/ /pubmed/37555491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585231189670 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meeting Reviews
Finlayson, Marcia
Al-Mashita, Leyan
Sandhu, Rebekah
Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
title Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
title_full Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
title_fullStr Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
title_short Participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
title_sort participant diversity in clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: a scoping review
topic Meeting Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37555491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585231189670
work_keys_str_mv AT finlaysonmarcia participantdiversityinclinicaltrialsofrehabilitationinterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisascopingreview
AT almashitaleyan participantdiversityinclinicaltrialsofrehabilitationinterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisascopingreview
AT sandhurebekah participantdiversityinclinicaltrialsofrehabilitationinterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisascopingreview