Cargando…
Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis
BACKGROUND: The microbiome is the collection of all micro-organisms and their genes, which naturally live in and on the body. The cervical and endometrial bacterial microbiome has previously been reported to affect fertility and influence the outcomes of assisted reproductive therapy (ART), includin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543728 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.941289 |
_version_ | 1785087233170079744 |
---|---|
author | Bednarska-Czerwińska, Anna Morawiec, Emilia Zmarzły, Nikola Szapski, Michał Jendrysek, Justyna Pecyna, Anika Zapletał-Pudełko, Karolina Małysiak, Weronika Sirek, Tomasz Ossowski, Piotr Łach, Aleksandra Boroń, Dariusz Bogdał, Paweł Bernet, Adam Strojny, Damian Grabarek, Beniamin Oskar |
author_facet | Bednarska-Czerwińska, Anna Morawiec, Emilia Zmarzły, Nikola Szapski, Michał Jendrysek, Justyna Pecyna, Anika Zapletał-Pudełko, Karolina Małysiak, Weronika Sirek, Tomasz Ossowski, Piotr Łach, Aleksandra Boroń, Dariusz Bogdał, Paweł Bernet, Adam Strojny, Damian Grabarek, Beniamin Oskar |
author_sort | Bednarska-Czerwińska, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The microbiome is the collection of all micro-organisms and their genes, which naturally live in and on the body. The cervical and endometrial bacterial microbiome has previously been reported to affect fertility and influence the outcomes of assisted reproductive therapy (ART), including embryo transfer. This study aimed to evaluate the cervical and endometrial bacterial microbiome in 177 women treated for infertility before, during, and after embryo implantation, and the outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: Cervical and endometrial swabs were collected from 177 women diagnosed with infertility at 3 time points: (1) during the initial examination, (2) during implantation, (3) 10–14 days after implantation. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to analyze the bacterial microbiome. Taxonomic identification was performed with the Usearch algorithm. RESULTS: There was a significant change in the number of patients with Escherichia coli depending on the collection time. For the first swab collection, there were significant negative relationships between the percentage of Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacillus spp. For the second collection, there was a negative relationship between Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus jensenii. For the third collection, negative relationships were found between Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus spp. A similar distribution of the bacterial microbiome was observed in all 3 swab collections. CONCLUSIONS: Lactobacillus spp. were the main bacteria identified in the cervix and endometrium, present before, during, and after successful embryo transfer. E. coli and G. vaginalis reduced the protective effect of Lactobacilli before, during, and after embryo transfer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10413908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104139082023-08-11 Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis Bednarska-Czerwińska, Anna Morawiec, Emilia Zmarzły, Nikola Szapski, Michał Jendrysek, Justyna Pecyna, Anika Zapletał-Pudełko, Karolina Małysiak, Weronika Sirek, Tomasz Ossowski, Piotr Łach, Aleksandra Boroń, Dariusz Bogdał, Paweł Bernet, Adam Strojny, Damian Grabarek, Beniamin Oskar Med Sci Monit Article BACKGROUND: The microbiome is the collection of all micro-organisms and their genes, which naturally live in and on the body. The cervical and endometrial bacterial microbiome has previously been reported to affect fertility and influence the outcomes of assisted reproductive therapy (ART), including embryo transfer. This study aimed to evaluate the cervical and endometrial bacterial microbiome in 177 women treated for infertility before, during, and after embryo implantation, and the outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: Cervical and endometrial swabs were collected from 177 women diagnosed with infertility at 3 time points: (1) during the initial examination, (2) during implantation, (3) 10–14 days after implantation. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to analyze the bacterial microbiome. Taxonomic identification was performed with the Usearch algorithm. RESULTS: There was a significant change in the number of patients with Escherichia coli depending on the collection time. For the first swab collection, there were significant negative relationships between the percentage of Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacillus spp. For the second collection, there was a negative relationship between Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus jensenii. For the third collection, negative relationships were found between Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus spp. A similar distribution of the bacterial microbiome was observed in all 3 swab collections. CONCLUSIONS: Lactobacillus spp. were the main bacteria identified in the cervix and endometrium, present before, during, and after successful embryo transfer. E. coli and G. vaginalis reduced the protective effect of Lactobacilli before, during, and after embryo transfer. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10413908/ /pubmed/37543728 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.941289 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Bednarska-Czerwińska, Anna Morawiec, Emilia Zmarzły, Nikola Szapski, Michał Jendrysek, Justyna Pecyna, Anika Zapletał-Pudełko, Karolina Małysiak, Weronika Sirek, Tomasz Ossowski, Piotr Łach, Aleksandra Boroń, Dariusz Bogdał, Paweł Bernet, Adam Strojny, Damian Grabarek, Beniamin Oskar Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis |
title | Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis |
title_full | Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis |
title_fullStr | Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis |
title_short | Dynamics of Microbiome Changes in the Endometrium and Uterine Cervix during Embryo Implantation: A Comparative Analysis |
title_sort | dynamics of microbiome changes in the endometrium and uterine cervix during embryo implantation: a comparative analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543728 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.941289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bednarskaczerwinskaanna dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT morawiecemilia dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT zmarzłynikola dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT szapskimichał dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT jendrysekjustyna dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT pecynaanika dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT zapletałpudełkokarolina dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT małysiakweronika dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT sirektomasz dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT ossowskipiotr dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT łachaleksandra dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT borondariusz dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT bogdałpaweł dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT bernetadam dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT strojnydamian dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis AT grabarekbeniaminoskar dynamicsofmicrobiomechangesintheendometriumanduterinecervixduringembryoimplantationacomparativeanalysis |