Cargando…

Endometrial Aspiration Cytology: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Its Efficacy and Sensitivity in Diagnosing Gynecological Disorders

Introduction Endometrial aspiration cytology (EAC) is a noninvasive, rapid, and cost-effective procedure for diagnosing gynecological disorders. This study aimed to validate endometrial aspiration as a routine, safe, and efficient outpatient diagnostic procedure, correlating its findings with histop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dongre, Trupti A, Maimoon, Sabiha A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575759
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41699
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction Endometrial aspiration cytology (EAC) is a noninvasive, rapid, and cost-effective procedure for diagnosing gynecological disorders. This study aimed to validate endometrial aspiration as a routine, safe, and efficient outpatient diagnostic procedure, correlating its findings with histopathology evaluations to facilitate early surgical planning for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study involved patients of reproductive, menopausal, and postmenopausal age groups who presented with diverse gynecological concerns that required dilatation and curettage. Endometrial aspiration was performed using a Karman cannula (Angiplast Pvt. Ltd., Vatva, India), and the obtained material was prepared into smears and stained for evaluation. Sampling adequacy, the nature of glandular and stromal cells, phasing of the endometrium, and other abnormalities were assessed and correlated with histology to examine the diagnostic utility of endometrial cytology. Results EAC showed 90.66% sampling adequacy with the Karman cannula. The sensitivity of EAC for diagnosing benign and malignant conditions was 88.7% and 100%, respectively. Conditions including secretory endometrium, proliferative phase, tuberculous endometritis, and glandular hyperplasia were diagnosed using EAC and confirmed by histopathology. Six malignancies were successfully diagnosed on cytology smears, while challenges in differentiation and sampling errors were recognized as limitations of the technique. Conclusions This study established EAC as a highly sensitive, minimally invasive preliminary diagnostic tool for gynecological disorders, particularly effective in diagnosing malignancy. Despite certain limitations, the procedure’s ease, cost-effectiveness, and safety underscore its potential for routine use by surgeons.