Cargando…
Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review
BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease responsible for more than 30 000 blind children worldwide. Its diagnosis and treatment are challenging due to the lack of specialists, divergent diagnostic concordance and variation in classification standards. While artific...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37558406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001216 |
_version_ | 1785087263242190848 |
---|---|
author | Nakayama, Luis Filipe Mitchell, William Greig Ribeiro, Lucas Zago Dychiao, Robyn Gayle Phanphruk, Warachaya Celi, Leo Anthony Kalua, Khumbo Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy Regatieri, Caio Vinicius Saito Moraes, Nilva Simeren Bueno |
author_facet | Nakayama, Luis Filipe Mitchell, William Greig Ribeiro, Lucas Zago Dychiao, Robyn Gayle Phanphruk, Warachaya Celi, Leo Anthony Kalua, Khumbo Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy Regatieri, Caio Vinicius Saito Moraes, Nilva Simeren Bueno |
author_sort | Nakayama, Luis Filipe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease responsible for more than 30 000 blind children worldwide. Its diagnosis and treatment are challenging due to the lack of specialists, divergent diagnostic concordance and variation in classification standards. While artificial intelligence (AI) can address the shortage of professionals and provide more cost-effective management, its development needs fairness, generalisability and bias controls prior to deployment to avoid producing harmful unpredictable results. This review aims to compare AI and ROP study’s characteristics, fairness and generalisability efforts. METHODS: Our review yielded 220 articles, of which 18 were included after full-text assessment. The articles were classified into ROP severity grading, plus detection, detecting treatment requiring, ROP prediction and detection of retinal zones. RESULTS: All the article’s authors and included patients are from middle-income and high-income countries, with no low-income countries, South America, Australia and Africa Continents representation. Code is available in two articles and in one on request, while data are not available in any article. 88.9% of the studies use the same retinal camera. In two articles, patients’ sex was described, but none applied a bias control in their models. CONCLUSION: The reviewed articles included 180 228 images and reported good metrics, but fairness, generalisability and bias control remained limited. Reproducibility is also a critical limitation, with few articles sharing codes and none sharing data. Fair and generalisable ROP and AI studies are needed that include diverse datasets, data and code sharing, collaborative research, and bias control to avoid unpredictable and harmful deployments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10414056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104140562023-08-11 Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review Nakayama, Luis Filipe Mitchell, William Greig Ribeiro, Lucas Zago Dychiao, Robyn Gayle Phanphruk, Warachaya Celi, Leo Anthony Kalua, Khumbo Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy Regatieri, Caio Vinicius Saito Moraes, Nilva Simeren Bueno BMJ Open Ophthalmol Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease responsible for more than 30 000 blind children worldwide. Its diagnosis and treatment are challenging due to the lack of specialists, divergent diagnostic concordance and variation in classification standards. While artificial intelligence (AI) can address the shortage of professionals and provide more cost-effective management, its development needs fairness, generalisability and bias controls prior to deployment to avoid producing harmful unpredictable results. This review aims to compare AI and ROP study’s characteristics, fairness and generalisability efforts. METHODS: Our review yielded 220 articles, of which 18 were included after full-text assessment. The articles were classified into ROP severity grading, plus detection, detecting treatment requiring, ROP prediction and detection of retinal zones. RESULTS: All the article’s authors and included patients are from middle-income and high-income countries, with no low-income countries, South America, Australia and Africa Continents representation. Code is available in two articles and in one on request, while data are not available in any article. 88.9% of the studies use the same retinal camera. In two articles, patients’ sex was described, but none applied a bias control in their models. CONCLUSION: The reviewed articles included 180 228 images and reported good metrics, but fairness, generalisability and bias control remained limited. Reproducibility is also a critical limitation, with few articles sharing codes and none sharing data. Fair and generalisable ROP and AI studies are needed that include diverse datasets, data and code sharing, collaborative research, and bias control to avoid unpredictable and harmful deployments. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10414056/ /pubmed/37558406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001216 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Nakayama, Luis Filipe Mitchell, William Greig Ribeiro, Lucas Zago Dychiao, Robyn Gayle Phanphruk, Warachaya Celi, Leo Anthony Kalua, Khumbo Santiago, Alvina Pauline Dy Regatieri, Caio Vinicius Saito Moraes, Nilva Simeren Bueno Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review |
title | Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review |
title_full | Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review |
title_fullStr | Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review |
title_short | Fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review |
title_sort | fairness and generalisability in deep learning of retinopathy of prematurity screening algorithms: a literature review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37558406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakayamaluisfilipe fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT mitchellwilliamgreig fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT ribeirolucaszago fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT dychiaorobyngayle fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT phanphrukwarachaya fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT celileoanthony fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT kaluakhumbo fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT santiagoalvinapaulinedy fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT regatiericaioviniciussaito fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview AT moraesnilvasimerenbueno fairnessandgeneralisabilityindeeplearningofretinopathyofprematurityscreeningalgorithmsaliteraturereview |