Cargando…
Administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Indicators of administrative professionals’ quality of life (QoL) in educational institutions are essential for planning improvements in their daily lives. QoL is a recurring topic in academic research, particularly in the healthcare sector. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37558456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074119 |
_version_ | 1785087265707393024 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Nicolli Godoi Silva, Regina Márcia Ferreira de Oliveira, Isabela Fernanda Rodrigues Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão da Costa, Woska Pires de Vitta, Alberto Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva Noll, Matias |
author_facet | Pereira, Nicolli Godoi Silva, Regina Márcia Ferreira de Oliveira, Isabela Fernanda Rodrigues Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão da Costa, Woska Pires de Vitta, Alberto Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva Noll, Matias |
author_sort | Pereira, Nicolli Godoi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Indicators of administrative professionals’ quality of life (QoL) in educational institutions are essential for planning improvements in their daily lives. QoL is a recurring topic in academic research, particularly in the healthcare sector. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the perceptions of administrative professionals in educational institutions regarding their QoL and the implications of remote and in-person work. Additionally, we aim to compare the QoL before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Five electronic databases will be searched for this systematic review: CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Original, peer-reviewed articles published in any language, without time limitations, will be included in this study. Two researchers will screen the articles and extract the data. The included articles will be evaluated for the quality of their evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and the Downs and Black scale. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The systematic review results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. The data will not include individual patient data; therefore, ethical approval is not required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022365862. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10414068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104140682023-08-11 Administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol Pereira, Nicolli Godoi Silva, Regina Márcia Ferreira de Oliveira, Isabela Fernanda Rodrigues Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão da Costa, Woska Pires de Vitta, Alberto Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva Noll, Matias BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Indicators of administrative professionals’ quality of life (QoL) in educational institutions are essential for planning improvements in their daily lives. QoL is a recurring topic in academic research, particularly in the healthcare sector. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the perceptions of administrative professionals in educational institutions regarding their QoL and the implications of remote and in-person work. Additionally, we aim to compare the QoL before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Five electronic databases will be searched for this systematic review: CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Original, peer-reviewed articles published in any language, without time limitations, will be included in this study. Two researchers will screen the articles and extract the data. The included articles will be evaluated for the quality of their evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and the Downs and Black scale. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The systematic review results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. The data will not include individual patient data; therefore, ethical approval is not required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022365862. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10414068/ /pubmed/37558456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074119 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Public Health Pereira, Nicolli Godoi Silva, Regina Márcia Ferreira de Oliveira, Isabela Fernanda Rodrigues Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão da Costa, Woska Pires de Vitta, Alberto Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva Noll, Matias Administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol |
title | Administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | Administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | Administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | administrative professionals’ quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37558456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereiranicolligodoi administrativeprofessionalsqualityoflifeineducationalinstitutionsasystematicreviewprotocol AT silvareginamarciaferreira administrativeprofessionalsqualityoflifeineducationalinstitutionsasystematicreviewprotocol AT deoliveiraisabelafernandarodrigues administrativeprofessionalsqualityoflifeineducationalinstitutionsasystematicreviewprotocol AT fernandesmicheledasilvavaladao administrativeprofessionalsqualityoflifeineducationalinstitutionsasystematicreviewprotocol AT dacostawoskapires administrativeprofessionalsqualityoflifeineducationalinstitutionsasystematicreviewprotocol AT devittaalberto administrativeprofessionalsqualityoflifeineducationalinstitutionsasystematicreviewprotocol AT nollpriscillarayanneesilva administrativeprofessionalsqualityoflifeineducationalinstitutionsasystematicreviewprotocol AT nollmatias administrativeprofessionalsqualityoflifeineducationalinstitutionsasystematicreviewprotocol |