Cargando…
‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway
OBJECTIVE: To explore patient and public perceptions of planned improvements to the National Health Service (NHS) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pathway. DESIGN: Three qualitative focus groups undertaken March–May 2018, as part of a mixed-methods evaluation of Getting It Right First Time. Transcript...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37558439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066762 |
_version_ | 1785087267890528256 |
---|---|
author | Jasim, Sarah Aspinal, Fiona Mehta, Raj Ledger, Jean Raine, Rosalind Fulop, Naomi J Barratt, Helen |
author_facet | Jasim, Sarah Aspinal, Fiona Mehta, Raj Ledger, Jean Raine, Rosalind Fulop, Naomi J Barratt, Helen |
author_sort | Jasim, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore patient and public perceptions of planned improvements to the National Health Service (NHS) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pathway. DESIGN: Three qualitative focus groups undertaken March–May 2018, as part of a mixed-methods evaluation of Getting It Right First Time. Transcripts were subject to framework analysis to identify thematic content between October 2018 and October 2021. SETTING: Elective TJA surgery in the English NHS. PARTICIPANTS: Two focus groups including patients who had undergone TJA in the previous 2 years (group 1: n=5; group 2: n=4) and the other individuals who had not but were aged 60+ (group 3: n=5). Participants were recruited via community groups and patient panels. RESULTS: Fourteen individuals took part in the focus groups; all were aged over 60; seven (50%) were female and nine (64%) had undergone TJA surgery. Participants’ perspectives were categorised into themes and mapped onto stages of the TJA pathway. Although perioperative care is often the focus of improvement efforts, participants argued that the patient journey begins before individuals present to primary care. Participants had concerns about other aspects of the pathway, such as obtaining a surgical referral, with prereferral interventions aimed at potentially avoiding the need for surgery (ie, physiotherapy) being perceived as a mechanism to restrict access to secondary care. Patient experience was also conceptualised as a ‘maze’, rather than the logical, sequential process set out in clinical guidelines; exacerbated by a lack of information, knowledge and power imbalances. CONCLUSION: The linear conceptualisation of the TJA pathway is at odds with patient experience. Improvement programmes focused on perioperative care fail to consider patient concerns and priorities. Patients should be directly involved in improvement programmes, to ensure that patient experience is optimised, as well as informing related processes and important outcomes of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10414077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104140772023-08-11 ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway Jasim, Sarah Aspinal, Fiona Mehta, Raj Ledger, Jean Raine, Rosalind Fulop, Naomi J Barratt, Helen BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To explore patient and public perceptions of planned improvements to the National Health Service (NHS) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pathway. DESIGN: Three qualitative focus groups undertaken March–May 2018, as part of a mixed-methods evaluation of Getting It Right First Time. Transcripts were subject to framework analysis to identify thematic content between October 2018 and October 2021. SETTING: Elective TJA surgery in the English NHS. PARTICIPANTS: Two focus groups including patients who had undergone TJA in the previous 2 years (group 1: n=5; group 2: n=4) and the other individuals who had not but were aged 60+ (group 3: n=5). Participants were recruited via community groups and patient panels. RESULTS: Fourteen individuals took part in the focus groups; all were aged over 60; seven (50%) were female and nine (64%) had undergone TJA surgery. Participants’ perspectives were categorised into themes and mapped onto stages of the TJA pathway. Although perioperative care is often the focus of improvement efforts, participants argued that the patient journey begins before individuals present to primary care. Participants had concerns about other aspects of the pathway, such as obtaining a surgical referral, with prereferral interventions aimed at potentially avoiding the need for surgery (ie, physiotherapy) being perceived as a mechanism to restrict access to secondary care. Patient experience was also conceptualised as a ‘maze’, rather than the logical, sequential process set out in clinical guidelines; exacerbated by a lack of information, knowledge and power imbalances. CONCLUSION: The linear conceptualisation of the TJA pathway is at odds with patient experience. Improvement programmes focused on perioperative care fail to consider patient concerns and priorities. Patients should be directly involved in improvement programmes, to ensure that patient experience is optimised, as well as informing related processes and important outcomes of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10414077/ /pubmed/37558439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066762 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Jasim, Sarah Aspinal, Fiona Mehta, Raj Ledger, Jean Raine, Rosalind Fulop, Naomi J Barratt, Helen ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway |
title | ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway |
title_full | ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway |
title_fullStr | ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway |
title_short | ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway |
title_sort | ‘maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the uk nhs elective total joint arthroplasty pathway |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37558439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066762 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jasimsarah mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway AT aspinalfiona mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway AT mehtaraj mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway AT ledgerjean mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway AT rainerosalind mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway AT fulopnaomij mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway AT barratthelen mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway |