Cargando…

‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway

OBJECTIVE: To explore patient and public perceptions of planned improvements to the National Health Service (NHS) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pathway. DESIGN: Three qualitative focus groups undertaken March–May 2018, as part of a mixed-methods evaluation of Getting It Right First Time. Transcript...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasim, Sarah, Aspinal, Fiona, Mehta, Raj, Ledger, Jean, Raine, Rosalind, Fulop, Naomi J, Barratt, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37558439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066762
_version_ 1785087267890528256
author Jasim, Sarah
Aspinal, Fiona
Mehta, Raj
Ledger, Jean
Raine, Rosalind
Fulop, Naomi J
Barratt, Helen
author_facet Jasim, Sarah
Aspinal, Fiona
Mehta, Raj
Ledger, Jean
Raine, Rosalind
Fulop, Naomi J
Barratt, Helen
author_sort Jasim, Sarah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore patient and public perceptions of planned improvements to the National Health Service (NHS) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pathway. DESIGN: Three qualitative focus groups undertaken March–May 2018, as part of a mixed-methods evaluation of Getting It Right First Time. Transcripts were subject to framework analysis to identify thematic content between October 2018 and October 2021. SETTING: Elective TJA surgery in the English NHS. PARTICIPANTS: Two focus groups including patients who had undergone TJA in the previous 2 years (group 1: n=5; group 2: n=4) and the other individuals who had not but were aged 60+ (group 3: n=5). Participants were recruited via community groups and patient panels. RESULTS: Fourteen individuals took part in the focus groups; all were aged over 60; seven (50%) were female and nine (64%) had undergone TJA surgery. Participants’ perspectives were categorised into themes and mapped onto stages of the TJA pathway. Although perioperative care is often the focus of improvement efforts, participants argued that the patient journey begins before individuals present to primary care. Participants had concerns about other aspects of the pathway, such as obtaining a surgical referral, with prereferral interventions aimed at potentially avoiding the need for surgery (ie, physiotherapy) being perceived as a mechanism to restrict access to secondary care. Patient experience was also conceptualised as a ‘maze’, rather than the logical, sequential process set out in clinical guidelines; exacerbated by a lack of information, knowledge and power imbalances. CONCLUSION: The linear conceptualisation of the TJA pathway is at odds with patient experience. Improvement programmes focused on perioperative care fail to consider patient concerns and priorities. Patients should be directly involved in improvement programmes, to ensure that patient experience is optimised, as well as informing related processes and important outcomes of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10414077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104140772023-08-11 ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway Jasim, Sarah Aspinal, Fiona Mehta, Raj Ledger, Jean Raine, Rosalind Fulop, Naomi J Barratt, Helen BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To explore patient and public perceptions of planned improvements to the National Health Service (NHS) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pathway. DESIGN: Three qualitative focus groups undertaken March–May 2018, as part of a mixed-methods evaluation of Getting It Right First Time. Transcripts were subject to framework analysis to identify thematic content between October 2018 and October 2021. SETTING: Elective TJA surgery in the English NHS. PARTICIPANTS: Two focus groups including patients who had undergone TJA in the previous 2 years (group 1: n=5; group 2: n=4) and the other individuals who had not but were aged 60+ (group 3: n=5). Participants were recruited via community groups and patient panels. RESULTS: Fourteen individuals took part in the focus groups; all were aged over 60; seven (50%) were female and nine (64%) had undergone TJA surgery. Participants’ perspectives were categorised into themes and mapped onto stages of the TJA pathway. Although perioperative care is often the focus of improvement efforts, participants argued that the patient journey begins before individuals present to primary care. Participants had concerns about other aspects of the pathway, such as obtaining a surgical referral, with prereferral interventions aimed at potentially avoiding the need for surgery (ie, physiotherapy) being perceived as a mechanism to restrict access to secondary care. Patient experience was also conceptualised as a ‘maze’, rather than the logical, sequential process set out in clinical guidelines; exacerbated by a lack of information, knowledge and power imbalances. CONCLUSION: The linear conceptualisation of the TJA pathway is at odds with patient experience. Improvement programmes focused on perioperative care fail to consider patient concerns and priorities. Patients should be directly involved in improvement programmes, to ensure that patient experience is optimised, as well as informing related processes and important outcomes of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10414077/ /pubmed/37558439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066762 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Jasim, Sarah
Aspinal, Fiona
Mehta, Raj
Ledger, Jean
Raine, Rosalind
Fulop, Naomi J
Barratt, Helen
‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway
title ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway
title_full ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway
title_fullStr ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway
title_full_unstemmed ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway
title_short ‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway
title_sort ‘maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the uk nhs elective total joint arthroplasty pathway
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37558439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066762
work_keys_str_mv AT jasimsarah mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway
AT aspinalfiona mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway
AT mehtaraj mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway
AT ledgerjean mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway
AT rainerosalind mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway
AT fulopnaomij mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway
AT barratthelen mazenotpathwayfocusgroupexplorationofpatientsandpublicexperiencesoftheuknhselectivetotaljointarthroplastypathway