Cargando…

Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry

This study of inter-test comparability of a novel visual field application installed on an augmented-reality portable headset and Humphrey field analyzer Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) Standard visual field test demonstrates the excellent correlation of mean deviation (MD) and mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Catherine, Sayed, Ahmed, McSoley, John, Durbin, Mary, Kashem, Rashed, Nicklin, Alexandra, Lopez, Valeria, Mijares, Georgeana, Chen, Michael, Shaheen, Abdulla, Segarra, Steven, Rady, Nadine, Duque, Christian Andres, Opoku-Baah, Collins, Abou Shousha, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37311012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002238
_version_ 1785087283227000832
author Johnson, Catherine
Sayed, Ahmed
McSoley, John
Durbin, Mary
Kashem, Rashed
Nicklin, Alexandra
Lopez, Valeria
Mijares, Georgeana
Chen, Michael
Shaheen, Abdulla
Segarra, Steven
Rady, Nadine
Duque, Christian Andres
Opoku-Baah, Collins
Abou Shousha, Mohamed
author_facet Johnson, Catherine
Sayed, Ahmed
McSoley, John
Durbin, Mary
Kashem, Rashed
Nicklin, Alexandra
Lopez, Valeria
Mijares, Georgeana
Chen, Michael
Shaheen, Abdulla
Segarra, Steven
Rady, Nadine
Duque, Christian Andres
Opoku-Baah, Collins
Abou Shousha, Mohamed
author_sort Johnson, Catherine
collection PubMed
description This study of inter-test comparability of a novel visual field application installed on an augmented-reality portable headset and Humphrey field analyzer Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) Standard visual field test demonstrates the excellent correlation of mean deviation (MD) and mean sensitivity (MS). PURPOSE: To determine the correlation between visual field testing with novel software on a wearable headset versus standard automated perimetry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with and without visual field defects attributable to glaucoma had visual field testing in one eye of each patient with 2 methods: re:Imagine Strategy (Heru, Inc.) and the Humphrey field analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.) SITA Standard 24-2 program. Main outcome measures included MS and MD, which were evaluated by linear regression, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland Altman analysis for assessment of the mean difference and limits of agreement. RESULTS: Measurements from 89 eyes of 89 patients (18 normal and 71 glaucomas) were compared with both instruments. Linear regression analysis demonstrated an excellent Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.94 for MS and r = 0.95 for MD. ICC analysis demonstrated high levels of concordance (ICC = 0.95, P < 0.001 for MS and ICC = 0.94, P < 0.001 for MD). Bland-Altman analysis determined a small mean difference between the two devices (Heru minus Humphrey) of 1.15 dB for MS and 1.06 dB for MD. CONCLUSIONS: The Heru visual field test correlated well with SITA Standard in a population of normal eyes and eyes with glaucoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10414153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104141532023-08-11 Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry Johnson, Catherine Sayed, Ahmed McSoley, John Durbin, Mary Kashem, Rashed Nicklin, Alexandra Lopez, Valeria Mijares, Georgeana Chen, Michael Shaheen, Abdulla Segarra, Steven Rady, Nadine Duque, Christian Andres Opoku-Baah, Collins Abou Shousha, Mohamed J Glaucoma New Glaucoma Insights: Original Studies This study of inter-test comparability of a novel visual field application installed on an augmented-reality portable headset and Humphrey field analyzer Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) Standard visual field test demonstrates the excellent correlation of mean deviation (MD) and mean sensitivity (MS). PURPOSE: To determine the correlation between visual field testing with novel software on a wearable headset versus standard automated perimetry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with and without visual field defects attributable to glaucoma had visual field testing in one eye of each patient with 2 methods: re:Imagine Strategy (Heru, Inc.) and the Humphrey field analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.) SITA Standard 24-2 program. Main outcome measures included MS and MD, which were evaluated by linear regression, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland Altman analysis for assessment of the mean difference and limits of agreement. RESULTS: Measurements from 89 eyes of 89 patients (18 normal and 71 glaucomas) were compared with both instruments. Linear regression analysis demonstrated an excellent Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.94 for MS and r = 0.95 for MD. ICC analysis demonstrated high levels of concordance (ICC = 0.95, P < 0.001 for MS and ICC = 0.94, P < 0.001 for MD). Bland-Altman analysis determined a small mean difference between the two devices (Heru minus Humphrey) of 1.15 dB for MS and 1.06 dB for MD. CONCLUSIONS: The Heru visual field test correlated well with SITA Standard in a population of normal eyes and eyes with glaucoma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10414153/ /pubmed/37311012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002238 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle New Glaucoma Insights: Original Studies
Johnson, Catherine
Sayed, Ahmed
McSoley, John
Durbin, Mary
Kashem, Rashed
Nicklin, Alexandra
Lopez, Valeria
Mijares, Georgeana
Chen, Michael
Shaheen, Abdulla
Segarra, Steven
Rady, Nadine
Duque, Christian Andres
Opoku-Baah, Collins
Abou Shousha, Mohamed
Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry
title Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_full Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_fullStr Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_short Comparison of Visual Field Test Measurements With a Novel Approach on a Wearable Headset to Standard Automated Perimetry
title_sort comparison of visual field test measurements with a novel approach on a wearable headset to standard automated perimetry
topic New Glaucoma Insights: Original Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37311012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002238
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsoncatherine comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT sayedahmed comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT mcsoleyjohn comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT durbinmary comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT kashemrashed comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT nicklinalexandra comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT lopezvaleria comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT mijaresgeorgeana comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT chenmichael comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT shaheenabdulla comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT segarrasteven comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT radynadine comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT duquechristianandres comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT opokubaahcollins comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry
AT aboushoushamohamed comparisonofvisualfieldtestmeasurementswithanovelapproachonawearableheadsettostandardautomatedperimetry