Cargando…

Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet

BACKGROUND: Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates. OBJECTIVE: This study identifies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korngiebel, Diane M, West, Kathleen McGlone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725563
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29706
_version_ 1785087311056207872
author Korngiebel, Diane M
West, Kathleen McGlone
author_facet Korngiebel, Diane M
West, Kathleen McGlone
author_sort Korngiebel, Diane M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates. OBJECTIVE: This study identifies patient preferences for the electronic return of genetic test results, including what considerations should be prioritized for content and design. METHODS: Following user-centered design methods, 59 interviews were conducted by using semistructured protocols. The interviews explored the content and design issues of patient portals that facilitated the return of test results to patients. We interviewed patients who received electronic results for specific types of genetics tests (pharmacogenetic tests, hereditary blood disorder tests, and tests for the risk of heritable cancers) or electronically received any type of genetic or nongenetic test results. RESULTS: In general, many of participants felt that there always needed to be some clinician involvement in electronic result returns and that electronic coversheets with simple summaries would be helpful for facilitating this. Coversheet summaries could accompany, but not replace, the more detailed report. Participants had specific suggestions for such results summaries, such as only reporting the information that was the most important for patients to understand, including next steps, and doing so by using clear language that is free of medical jargon. Electronic result returns should also include explicit encouragement for patients to contact health care providers about questions. Finally, many participants preferred to manage their care by using their smartphones, particularly in instances when they needed to access health information on the go. CONCLUSIONS: Participants recommended that a patient-friendly front section should accompany the more detailed report and made suggestions for organization, content, and wording. Many used their smartphones regularly to access test results; therefore, health systems and patient portal software vendors should accommodate smartphone app design and web portal design concomitantly when developing platforms for returning results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10414314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104143142023-09-12 Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet Korngiebel, Diane M West, Kathleen McGlone JMIRx Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates. OBJECTIVE: This study identifies patient preferences for the electronic return of genetic test results, including what considerations should be prioritized for content and design. METHODS: Following user-centered design methods, 59 interviews were conducted by using semistructured protocols. The interviews explored the content and design issues of patient portals that facilitated the return of test results to patients. We interviewed patients who received electronic results for specific types of genetics tests (pharmacogenetic tests, hereditary blood disorder tests, and tests for the risk of heritable cancers) or electronically received any type of genetic or nongenetic test results. RESULTS: In general, many of participants felt that there always needed to be some clinician involvement in electronic result returns and that electronic coversheets with simple summaries would be helpful for facilitating this. Coversheet summaries could accompany, but not replace, the more detailed report. Participants had specific suggestions for such results summaries, such as only reporting the information that was the most important for patients to understand, including next steps, and doing so by using clear language that is free of medical jargon. Electronic result returns should also include explicit encouragement for patients to contact health care providers about questions. Finally, many participants preferred to manage their care by using their smartphones, particularly in instances when they needed to access health information on the go. CONCLUSIONS: Participants recommended that a patient-friendly front section should accompany the more detailed report and made suggestions for organization, content, and wording. Many used their smartphones regularly to access test results; therefore, health systems and patient portal software vendors should accommodate smartphone app design and web portal design concomitantly when developing platforms for returning results. JMIR Publications 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10414314/ /pubmed/37725563 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29706 Text en ©Diane M Korngiebel, Kathleen McGlone West. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 31.05.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Korngiebel, Diane M
West, Kathleen McGlone
Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet
title Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet
title_full Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet
title_fullStr Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet
title_full_unstemmed Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet
title_short Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet
title_sort patient recommendations for the content and design of electronic returns of genetic test results: interview study among patients who accessed their genetic test results via the internet
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725563
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29706
work_keys_str_mv AT korngiebeldianem patientrecommendationsforthecontentanddesignofelectronicreturnsofgenetictestresultsinterviewstudyamongpatientswhoaccessedtheirgenetictestresultsviatheinternet
AT westkathleenmcglone patientrecommendationsforthecontentanddesignofelectronicreturnsofgenetictestresultsinterviewstudyamongpatientswhoaccessedtheirgenetictestresultsviatheinternet