Cargando…
Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review”
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414480/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28744 |
| _version_ | 1785087346821038080 |
|---|---|
| author | Mbwogge, Mathew |
| author_facet | Mbwogge, Mathew |
| author_sort | Mbwogge, Mathew |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-10414480 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-104144802023-09-12 Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review” Mbwogge, Mathew JMIRx Med Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews JMIR Publications 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10414480/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28744 Text en ©Mathew Mbwogge. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 12.04.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
| spellingShingle | Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews Mbwogge, Mathew Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review” |
| title | Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review” |
| title_full | Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review” |
| title_fullStr | Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review” |
| title_full_unstemmed | Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review” |
| title_short | Author’s Response to Peer Reviews of “Mass Testing With Contact Tracing Compared to Test and Trace for the Effective Suppression of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Systematic Review” |
| title_sort | author’s response to peer reviews of “mass testing with contact tracing compared to test and trace for the effective suppression of covid-19 in the united kingdom: systematic review” |
| topic | Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414480/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28744 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mbwoggemathew authorsresponsetopeerreviewsofmasstestingwithcontacttracingcomparedtotestandtracefortheeffectivesuppressionofcovid19intheunitedkingdomsystematicreview |