Cargando…
Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak
Following the outbreak of Omicron and its subvariants, many of the currently available rapid Ag tests (RATs) showed a decrease in clinical performance. In this study, we evaluated the clinical sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 for nasopharyngeal swabs and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37561721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289990 |
_version_ | 1785087365275975680 |
---|---|
author | Widyasari, Kristin Kim, Sunjoo |
author_facet | Widyasari, Kristin Kim, Sunjoo |
author_sort | Widyasari, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following the outbreak of Omicron and its subvariants, many of the currently available rapid Ag tests (RATs) showed a decrease in clinical performance. In this study, we evaluated the clinical sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 for nasopharyngeal swabs and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 Nasal for nasal swabs in 56 symptomatic individuals by comparing the results between RATs, RT-PCR, Omicron RT-PCR, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Furthermore, sequences of the Omicron subvariants’ spike proteins were subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Both novel RATs demonstrated a high sensitivity of up to 92.86%, (95% CI 82.71%– 98.02%), 94.23%, (95% CI 83.07%– 98.49%), and 97.95% (95% CI 87.76%– 99.89%) compared to the RT-PCR, Omicron RT-PCR, and WGS, respectively. The clinical sensitivity of RATs was at its highest when the Ct value was restricted to 15≤Ct<25, with a sensitivity of 97.05% for RdRp genes. The Omicron RT-PCR analysis revealed subvariants BA.4 or BA.5 (76.8%) and BA.2.75 (16.1%). Subsequently, the WGS analysis identified BA.5 (65.5%) as the dominant subvariant. Phylogenetic analysis of the spike protein of Omicron’s subvariants showed a close relationship between BA.4, BA.5, and BA.2.75. These results demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 Nasal are considered useful and efficient RATs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, particularly during the current Omicron subvariants wave. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10414561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104145612023-08-11 Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak Widyasari, Kristin Kim, Sunjoo PLoS One Research Article Following the outbreak of Omicron and its subvariants, many of the currently available rapid Ag tests (RATs) showed a decrease in clinical performance. In this study, we evaluated the clinical sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 for nasopharyngeal swabs and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 Nasal for nasal swabs in 56 symptomatic individuals by comparing the results between RATs, RT-PCR, Omicron RT-PCR, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Furthermore, sequences of the Omicron subvariants’ spike proteins were subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Both novel RATs demonstrated a high sensitivity of up to 92.86%, (95% CI 82.71%– 98.02%), 94.23%, (95% CI 83.07%– 98.49%), and 97.95% (95% CI 87.76%– 99.89%) compared to the RT-PCR, Omicron RT-PCR, and WGS, respectively. The clinical sensitivity of RATs was at its highest when the Ct value was restricted to 15≤Ct<25, with a sensitivity of 97.05% for RdRp genes. The Omicron RT-PCR analysis revealed subvariants BA.4 or BA.5 (76.8%) and BA.2.75 (16.1%). Subsequently, the WGS analysis identified BA.5 (65.5%) as the dominant subvariant. Phylogenetic analysis of the spike protein of Omicron’s subvariants showed a close relationship between BA.4, BA.5, and BA.2.75. These results demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 Nasal are considered useful and efficient RATs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, particularly during the current Omicron subvariants wave. Public Library of Science 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10414561/ /pubmed/37561721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289990 Text en © 2023 Widyasari, Kim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Widyasari, Kristin Kim, Sunjoo Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak |
title | Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak |
title_full | Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak |
title_short | Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak |
title_sort | efficacy of novel sars-cov-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37561721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289990 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT widyasarikristin efficacyofnovelsarscov2rapidantigentestsintheeraofomicronoutbreak AT kimsunjoo efficacyofnovelsarscov2rapidantigentestsintheeraofomicronoutbreak |