Cargando…

Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak

Following the outbreak of Omicron and its subvariants, many of the currently available rapid Ag tests (RATs) showed a decrease in clinical performance. In this study, we evaluated the clinical sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 for nasopharyngeal swabs and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Widyasari, Kristin, Kim, Sunjoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37561721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289990
_version_ 1785087365275975680
author Widyasari, Kristin
Kim, Sunjoo
author_facet Widyasari, Kristin
Kim, Sunjoo
author_sort Widyasari, Kristin
collection PubMed
description Following the outbreak of Omicron and its subvariants, many of the currently available rapid Ag tests (RATs) showed a decrease in clinical performance. In this study, we evaluated the clinical sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 for nasopharyngeal swabs and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 Nasal for nasal swabs in 56 symptomatic individuals by comparing the results between RATs, RT-PCR, Omicron RT-PCR, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Furthermore, sequences of the Omicron subvariants’ spike proteins were subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Both novel RATs demonstrated a high sensitivity of up to 92.86%, (95% CI 82.71%– 98.02%), 94.23%, (95% CI 83.07%– 98.49%), and 97.95% (95% CI 87.76%– 99.89%) compared to the RT-PCR, Omicron RT-PCR, and WGS, respectively. The clinical sensitivity of RATs was at its highest when the Ct value was restricted to 15≤Ct<25, with a sensitivity of 97.05% for RdRp genes. The Omicron RT-PCR analysis revealed subvariants BA.4 or BA.5 (76.8%) and BA.2.75 (16.1%). Subsequently, the WGS analysis identified BA.5 (65.5%) as the dominant subvariant. Phylogenetic analysis of the spike protein of Omicron’s subvariants showed a close relationship between BA.4, BA.5, and BA.2.75. These results demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 Nasal are considered useful and efficient RATs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, particularly during the current Omicron subvariants wave.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10414561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104145612023-08-11 Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak Widyasari, Kristin Kim, Sunjoo PLoS One Research Article Following the outbreak of Omicron and its subvariants, many of the currently available rapid Ag tests (RATs) showed a decrease in clinical performance. In this study, we evaluated the clinical sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 for nasopharyngeal swabs and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 Nasal for nasal swabs in 56 symptomatic individuals by comparing the results between RATs, RT-PCR, Omicron RT-PCR, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Furthermore, sequences of the Omicron subvariants’ spike proteins were subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Both novel RATs demonstrated a high sensitivity of up to 92.86%, (95% CI 82.71%– 98.02%), 94.23%, (95% CI 83.07%– 98.49%), and 97.95% (95% CI 87.76%– 99.89%) compared to the RT-PCR, Omicron RT-PCR, and WGS, respectively. The clinical sensitivity of RATs was at its highest when the Ct value was restricted to 15≤Ct<25, with a sensitivity of 97.05% for RdRp genes. The Omicron RT-PCR analysis revealed subvariants BA.4 or BA.5 (76.8%) and BA.2.75 (16.1%). Subsequently, the WGS analysis identified BA.5 (65.5%) as the dominant subvariant. Phylogenetic analysis of the spike protein of Omicron’s subvariants showed a close relationship between BA.4, BA.5, and BA.2.75. These results demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test 2.0 Nasal are considered useful and efficient RATs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, particularly during the current Omicron subvariants wave. Public Library of Science 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10414561/ /pubmed/37561721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289990 Text en © 2023 Widyasari, Kim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Widyasari, Kristin
Kim, Sunjoo
Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak
title Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak
title_full Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak
title_fullStr Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak
title_short Efficacy of novel SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak
title_sort efficacy of novel sars-cov-2 rapid antigen tests in the era of omicron outbreak
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37561721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289990
work_keys_str_mv AT widyasarikristin efficacyofnovelsarscov2rapidantigentestsintheeraofomicronoutbreak
AT kimsunjoo efficacyofnovelsarscov2rapidantigentestsintheeraofomicronoutbreak