Cargando…
Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device
With the global increase in food exchange, rapid identification and enumeration of bacteria has become crucial for protecting consumers from bacterial contamination. Efficient analysis requires the separation of target particles (e.g., bacterial cells) from food and/or sampling matrices to prevent m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AIP Publishing LLC
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0159254 |
_version_ | 1785087429369135104 |
---|---|
author | Esan, Ayomikun Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique Swift, Simon McGoverin, Cushla M. |
author_facet | Esan, Ayomikun Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique Swift, Simon McGoverin, Cushla M. |
author_sort | Esan, Ayomikun |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the global increase in food exchange, rapid identification and enumeration of bacteria has become crucial for protecting consumers from bacterial contamination. Efficient analysis requires the separation of target particles (e.g., bacterial cells) from food and/or sampling matrices to prevent matrix interference with the detection and analysis of target cells. However, studies on the separation of bacteria-sized particles and defined particles, such as bacterial cells, from heterogeneous debris, such as meat swab suspensions, are limited. In this study, we explore the use of passive-based inertial microfluidics to separate bacterial cells from debris, such as fascia, muscle tissues, and cotton fibers, extracted from ground meat and meat swabs—a novel approach demonstrated for the first time. Our objective is to evaluate the recovery efficiency of bacterial cells from large debris obtained from ground meat and meat swab suspensions using a spiral microfluidic device. In this study, we establish the optimal flow rates and Dean number for continuous bacterial cell and debris separation and a methodology to determine the percentage of debris removed from the sample suspension. Our findings demonstrate an average recovery efficiency of [Formula: see text] 80% for bacterial cells separated from debris in meat swab suspensions, while the average recovery efficiency from ground beef suspensions was [Formula: see text] 70%. Furthermore, approximately 50% of the debris in the ground meat suspension were separated from bacterial cells. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10415021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AIP Publishing LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104150212023-08-11 Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device Esan, Ayomikun Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique Swift, Simon McGoverin, Cushla M. Biomicrofluidics Regular Articles With the global increase in food exchange, rapid identification and enumeration of bacteria has become crucial for protecting consumers from bacterial contamination. Efficient analysis requires the separation of target particles (e.g., bacterial cells) from food and/or sampling matrices to prevent matrix interference with the detection and analysis of target cells. However, studies on the separation of bacteria-sized particles and defined particles, such as bacterial cells, from heterogeneous debris, such as meat swab suspensions, are limited. In this study, we explore the use of passive-based inertial microfluidics to separate bacterial cells from debris, such as fascia, muscle tissues, and cotton fibers, extracted from ground meat and meat swabs—a novel approach demonstrated for the first time. Our objective is to evaluate the recovery efficiency of bacterial cells from large debris obtained from ground meat and meat swab suspensions using a spiral microfluidic device. In this study, we establish the optimal flow rates and Dean number for continuous bacterial cell and debris separation and a methodology to determine the percentage of debris removed from the sample suspension. Our findings demonstrate an average recovery efficiency of [Formula: see text] 80% for bacterial cells separated from debris in meat swab suspensions, while the average recovery efficiency from ground beef suspensions was [Formula: see text] 70%. Furthermore, approximately 50% of the debris in the ground meat suspension were separated from bacterial cells. AIP Publishing LLC 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10415021/ /pubmed/37576440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0159254 Text en © 2023 Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles Esan, Ayomikun Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique Swift, Simon McGoverin, Cushla M. Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device |
title | Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device |
title_full | Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device |
title_fullStr | Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device |
title_short | Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device |
title_sort | continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device |
topic | Regular Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0159254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT esanayomikun continuousseparationofbacterialcellsfromlargedebrisusingaspiralmicrofluidicdevice AT vanholsbeeckfrederique continuousseparationofbacterialcellsfromlargedebrisusingaspiralmicrofluidicdevice AT swiftsimon continuousseparationofbacterialcellsfromlargedebrisusingaspiralmicrofluidicdevice AT mcgoverincushlam continuousseparationofbacterialcellsfromlargedebrisusingaspiralmicrofluidicdevice |