Cargando…

Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device

With the global increase in food exchange, rapid identification and enumeration of bacteria has become crucial for protecting consumers from bacterial contamination. Efficient analysis requires the separation of target particles (e.g., bacterial cells) from food and/or sampling matrices to prevent m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esan, Ayomikun, Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique, Swift, Simon, McGoverin, Cushla M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIP Publishing LLC 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0159254
_version_ 1785087429369135104
author Esan, Ayomikun
Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique
Swift, Simon
McGoverin, Cushla M.
author_facet Esan, Ayomikun
Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique
Swift, Simon
McGoverin, Cushla M.
author_sort Esan, Ayomikun
collection PubMed
description With the global increase in food exchange, rapid identification and enumeration of bacteria has become crucial for protecting consumers from bacterial contamination. Efficient analysis requires the separation of target particles (e.g., bacterial cells) from food and/or sampling matrices to prevent matrix interference with the detection and analysis of target cells. However, studies on the separation of bacteria-sized particles and defined particles, such as bacterial cells, from heterogeneous debris, such as meat swab suspensions, are limited. In this study, we explore the use of passive-based inertial microfluidics to separate bacterial cells from debris, such as fascia, muscle tissues, and cotton fibers, extracted from ground meat and meat swabs—a novel approach demonstrated for the first time. Our objective is to evaluate the recovery efficiency of bacterial cells from large debris obtained from ground meat and meat swab suspensions using a spiral microfluidic device. In this study, we establish the optimal flow rates and Dean number for continuous bacterial cell and debris separation and a methodology to determine the percentage of debris removed from the sample suspension. Our findings demonstrate an average recovery efficiency of [Formula: see text] 80% for bacterial cells separated from debris in meat swab suspensions, while the average recovery efficiency from ground beef suspensions was [Formula: see text] 70%. Furthermore, approximately 50% of the debris in the ground meat suspension were separated from bacterial cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104150212023-08-11 Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device Esan, Ayomikun Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique Swift, Simon McGoverin, Cushla M. Biomicrofluidics Regular Articles With the global increase in food exchange, rapid identification and enumeration of bacteria has become crucial for protecting consumers from bacterial contamination. Efficient analysis requires the separation of target particles (e.g., bacterial cells) from food and/or sampling matrices to prevent matrix interference with the detection and analysis of target cells. However, studies on the separation of bacteria-sized particles and defined particles, such as bacterial cells, from heterogeneous debris, such as meat swab suspensions, are limited. In this study, we explore the use of passive-based inertial microfluidics to separate bacterial cells from debris, such as fascia, muscle tissues, and cotton fibers, extracted from ground meat and meat swabs—a novel approach demonstrated for the first time. Our objective is to evaluate the recovery efficiency of bacterial cells from large debris obtained from ground meat and meat swab suspensions using a spiral microfluidic device. In this study, we establish the optimal flow rates and Dean number for continuous bacterial cell and debris separation and a methodology to determine the percentage of debris removed from the sample suspension. Our findings demonstrate an average recovery efficiency of [Formula: see text] 80% for bacterial cells separated from debris in meat swab suspensions, while the average recovery efficiency from ground beef suspensions was [Formula: see text] 70%. Furthermore, approximately 50% of the debris in the ground meat suspension were separated from bacterial cells. AIP Publishing LLC 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10415021/ /pubmed/37576440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0159254 Text en © 2023 Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Esan, Ayomikun
Vanholsbeeck, Frédérique
Swift, Simon
McGoverin, Cushla M.
Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device
title Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device
title_full Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device
title_fullStr Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device
title_full_unstemmed Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device
title_short Continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device
title_sort continuous separation of bacterial cells from large debris using a spiral microfluidic device
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0159254
work_keys_str_mv AT esanayomikun continuousseparationofbacterialcellsfromlargedebrisusingaspiralmicrofluidicdevice
AT vanholsbeeckfrederique continuousseparationofbacterialcellsfromlargedebrisusingaspiralmicrofluidicdevice
AT swiftsimon continuousseparationofbacterialcellsfromlargedebrisusingaspiralmicrofluidicdevice
AT mcgoverincushlam continuousseparationofbacterialcellsfromlargedebrisusingaspiralmicrofluidicdevice