Cargando…

Update und Trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion nach Mastektomie

Due to refinements in operating techniques, autologous breast reconstruction has become part of standard care. It has become more difficult to advise patients due to the expansion of oncologic options for mastectomy, radiation therapy and the variety of reconstructive techniques. The goal of reconst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Supper, Paul, Semmler, Lorenz, Placheta-Györi, Eva, Teufelsbauer, Maryana, Harik-Chraim, Elissa, Radtke, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37487507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2082-1542
_version_ 1785087430373670912
author Supper, Paul
Semmler, Lorenz
Placheta-Györi, Eva
Teufelsbauer, Maryana
Harik-Chraim, Elissa
Radtke, Christine
author_facet Supper, Paul
Semmler, Lorenz
Placheta-Györi, Eva
Teufelsbauer, Maryana
Harik-Chraim, Elissa
Radtke, Christine
author_sort Supper, Paul
collection PubMed
description Due to refinements in operating techniques, autologous breast reconstruction has become part of standard care. It has become more difficult to advise patients due to the expansion of oncologic options for mastectomy, radiation therapy and the variety of reconstructive techniques. The goal of reconstruction is to achieve oncologically clear margins and a long-term aesthetically satisfactory result with a high quality of life. Immediate reconstruction preserves the skin of the breast and its natural form and prevents the psychological trauma associated with mastectomy. However, secondary reconstructions often have a higher satisfaction, since here no restitutio ad integrum is assumed. Alloplastic, i. e., implant-based, breast reconstruction and autologous breast reconstruction are complementary techniques. This article provides an overview of current options for breast reconstruction including patients’ satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction. Although immediate reconstruction is still the preferred choice of most patients and surgeons, delayed reconstruction does not appear to compromise clinical or patient-reported outcomes. Recent refinements in surgical techniques and autologous breast reconstruction include stacked-flaps, as well as microsurgical nerve coaptation to restore sensitivity, which lead to improved outcomes and quality of life. Nowadays Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy, accompanied by improved implant quality, allows immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction as well as reemergence of the prepectoral implantation. The choice of breast reconstruction depends on the type of mastectomy, necessary radiation, individual risk factors, as well as the patient's habitus and wishes. Overall, recent developments in breast reconstruction led to an increase in patient satisfaction, quality of life and aesthetic outcome with oncological safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104150252023-08-11 Update und Trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion nach Mastektomie Supper, Paul Semmler, Lorenz Placheta-Györi, Eva Teufelsbauer, Maryana Harik-Chraim, Elissa Radtke, Christine Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir Due to refinements in operating techniques, autologous breast reconstruction has become part of standard care. It has become more difficult to advise patients due to the expansion of oncologic options for mastectomy, radiation therapy and the variety of reconstructive techniques. The goal of reconstruction is to achieve oncologically clear margins and a long-term aesthetically satisfactory result with a high quality of life. Immediate reconstruction preserves the skin of the breast and its natural form and prevents the psychological trauma associated with mastectomy. However, secondary reconstructions often have a higher satisfaction, since here no restitutio ad integrum is assumed. Alloplastic, i. e., implant-based, breast reconstruction and autologous breast reconstruction are complementary techniques. This article provides an overview of current options for breast reconstruction including patients’ satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction. Although immediate reconstruction is still the preferred choice of most patients and surgeons, delayed reconstruction does not appear to compromise clinical or patient-reported outcomes. Recent refinements in surgical techniques and autologous breast reconstruction include stacked-flaps, as well as microsurgical nerve coaptation to restore sensitivity, which lead to improved outcomes and quality of life. Nowadays Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy, accompanied by improved implant quality, allows immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction as well as reemergence of the prepectoral implantation. The choice of breast reconstruction depends on the type of mastectomy, necessary radiation, individual risk factors, as well as the patient's habitus and wishes. Overall, recent developments in breast reconstruction led to an increase in patient satisfaction, quality of life and aesthetic outcome with oncological safety. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10415025/ /pubmed/37487507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2082-1542 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supper, Paul
Semmler, Lorenz
Placheta-Györi, Eva
Teufelsbauer, Maryana
Harik-Chraim, Elissa
Radtke, Christine
Update und Trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion nach Mastektomie
title Update und Trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion nach Mastektomie
title_full Update und Trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion nach Mastektomie
title_fullStr Update und Trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion nach Mastektomie
title_full_unstemmed Update und Trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion nach Mastektomie
title_short Update und Trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion nach Mastektomie
title_sort update und trends bei der plastisch-chirurgischen brustrekonstruktion nach mastektomie
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37487507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2082-1542
work_keys_str_mv AT supperpaul updateundtrendsbeiderplastischchirurgischenbrustrekonstruktionnachmastektomie
AT semmlerlorenz updateundtrendsbeiderplastischchirurgischenbrustrekonstruktionnachmastektomie
AT plachetagyorieva updateundtrendsbeiderplastischchirurgischenbrustrekonstruktionnachmastektomie
AT teufelsbauermaryana updateundtrendsbeiderplastischchirurgischenbrustrekonstruktionnachmastektomie
AT harikchraimelissa updateundtrendsbeiderplastischchirurgischenbrustrekonstruktionnachmastektomie
AT radtkechristine updateundtrendsbeiderplastischchirurgischenbrustrekonstruktionnachmastektomie