Cargando…

Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP)

Traditional diagnostic formulations of psychotic disorders have low correspondence with underlying disease neurobiology. This has led to a growing interest in using brain-based biomarkers to capture biologically-informed psychosis constructs. Building upon our prior work on the B-SNIP Psychosis Biot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koen, Joshua D., Lewis, Leslie, Rugg, Michael D., Clementz, Brett A., Keshavan, Matcheri S., Pearlson, Godfrey D., Sweeney, John A., Tamminga, Carol A., Ivleva, Elena I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38101-0
_version_ 1785087522725953536
author Koen, Joshua D.
Lewis, Leslie
Rugg, Michael D.
Clementz, Brett A.
Keshavan, Matcheri S.
Pearlson, Godfrey D.
Sweeney, John A.
Tamminga, Carol A.
Ivleva, Elena I.
author_facet Koen, Joshua D.
Lewis, Leslie
Rugg, Michael D.
Clementz, Brett A.
Keshavan, Matcheri S.
Pearlson, Godfrey D.
Sweeney, John A.
Tamminga, Carol A.
Ivleva, Elena I.
author_sort Koen, Joshua D.
collection PubMed
description Traditional diagnostic formulations of psychotic disorders have low correspondence with underlying disease neurobiology. This has led to a growing interest in using brain-based biomarkers to capture biologically-informed psychosis constructs. Building upon our prior work on the B-SNIP Psychosis Biotypes, we aimed to examine whether structural MRI (an independent biomarker not used in the Biotype development) can effectively classify the Biotypes. Whole brain voxel-wise grey matter density (GMD) maps from T1-weighted images were used to train and test (using repeated randomized train/test splits) binary L2-penalized logistic regression models to discriminate psychosis cases (n = 557) from healthy controls (CON, n = 251). A total of six models were evaluated across two psychosis categorization schemes: (i) three Biotypes (B1, B2, B3) and (ii) three DSM diagnoses (schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective (SAD) and bipolar (BD) disorders). Above-chance classification accuracies were observed in all Biotype (B1 = 0.70, B2 = 0.65, and B3 = 0.56) and diagnosis (SZ = 0.64, SAD = 0.64, and BD = 0.59) models. However, the only model that showed evidence of specificity was B1, i.e., the model was able to discriminate B1 vs. CON and did not misclassify other psychosis cases (B2 or B3) as B1 at rates above nominal chance. The GMD-based classifier evidence for B1 showed a negative association with an estimate of premorbid general intellectual ability, regardless of group membership, i.e. psychosis or CON. Our findings indicate that, complimentary to clinical diagnoses, the B-SNIP Psychosis Biotypes may offer a promising approach to capture specific aspects of psychosis neurobiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104153692023-08-12 Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP) Koen, Joshua D. Lewis, Leslie Rugg, Michael D. Clementz, Brett A. Keshavan, Matcheri S. Pearlson, Godfrey D. Sweeney, John A. Tamminga, Carol A. Ivleva, Elena I. Sci Rep Article Traditional diagnostic formulations of psychotic disorders have low correspondence with underlying disease neurobiology. This has led to a growing interest in using brain-based biomarkers to capture biologically-informed psychosis constructs. Building upon our prior work on the B-SNIP Psychosis Biotypes, we aimed to examine whether structural MRI (an independent biomarker not used in the Biotype development) can effectively classify the Biotypes. Whole brain voxel-wise grey matter density (GMD) maps from T1-weighted images were used to train and test (using repeated randomized train/test splits) binary L2-penalized logistic regression models to discriminate psychosis cases (n = 557) from healthy controls (CON, n = 251). A total of six models were evaluated across two psychosis categorization schemes: (i) three Biotypes (B1, B2, B3) and (ii) three DSM diagnoses (schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective (SAD) and bipolar (BD) disorders). Above-chance classification accuracies were observed in all Biotype (B1 = 0.70, B2 = 0.65, and B3 = 0.56) and diagnosis (SZ = 0.64, SAD = 0.64, and BD = 0.59) models. However, the only model that showed evidence of specificity was B1, i.e., the model was able to discriminate B1 vs. CON and did not misclassify other psychosis cases (B2 or B3) as B1 at rates above nominal chance. The GMD-based classifier evidence for B1 showed a negative association with an estimate of premorbid general intellectual ability, regardless of group membership, i.e. psychosis or CON. Our findings indicate that, complimentary to clinical diagnoses, the B-SNIP Psychosis Biotypes may offer a promising approach to capture specific aspects of psychosis neurobiology. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10415369/ /pubmed/37563219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38101-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Koen, Joshua D.
Lewis, Leslie
Rugg, Michael D.
Clementz, Brett A.
Keshavan, Matcheri S.
Pearlson, Godfrey D.
Sweeney, John A.
Tamminga, Carol A.
Ivleva, Elena I.
Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP)
title Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP)
title_full Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP)
title_fullStr Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP)
title_full_unstemmed Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP)
title_short Supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (B-SNIP)
title_sort supervised machine learning classification of psychosis biotypes based on brain structure: findings from the bipolar-schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes (b-snip)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38101-0
work_keys_str_mv AT koenjoshuad supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip
AT lewisleslie supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip
AT ruggmichaeld supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip
AT clementzbretta supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip
AT keshavanmatcheris supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip
AT pearlsongodfreyd supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip
AT sweeneyjohna supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip
AT tammingacarola supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip
AT ivlevaelenai supervisedmachinelearningclassificationofpsychosisbiotypesbasedonbrainstructurefindingsfromthebipolarschizophrenianetworkforintermediatephenotypesbsnip