Cargando…

In vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty

OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to study titanium remains in a bone model during standardized implantoplasty under different isolation and protective modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty implants were placed in artificial spongy bone blocks mimicking a horizontal bone loss and implant neck protrusion of 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Platt, A., Liu, C. C., Gubler, A., Naenni, N., Thoma, D., Schmidlin, P. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37140763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05037-8
_version_ 1785087536662577152
author Platt, A.
Liu, C. C.
Gubler, A.
Naenni, N.
Thoma, D.
Schmidlin, P. R.
author_facet Platt, A.
Liu, C. C.
Gubler, A.
Naenni, N.
Thoma, D.
Schmidlin, P. R.
author_sort Platt, A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to study titanium remains in a bone model during standardized implantoplasty under different isolation and protective modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty implants were placed in artificial spongy bone blocks mimicking a horizontal bone loss and implant neck protrusion of 5 mm. Samples were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), which were treated as follows: rubber dam (A), a dental adhesive paste (B), bone wax (C), and an unprotected positive control (D). Implantoplasty was performed using carbide and diamond burs under strict water cooling and standardized suction. After removal of the respective isolation materials, the bone blocks were thoroughly rinsed with tap water for 3 min and titanium chips were collected using a filter integrated in the model. The filter paper was removed and dissolved in 37% hydrochloric acid for 2 h at 120 °C and the titanium remnants were quantified using atomic absorption spectrometry. RESULTS: None of the test groups were able to completely prevent titanium particle contamination. Rubber dam (691 ± 249 µg) and bone wax (516 ± 157 µg) were found to be significantly more protective than the positive control (2313 ± 747 µg) (p < 0.001) with respect to the amount of titanium particles that remained in the bone model after implantoplasty. The adhesive paste group (1863.5 ± 538 µg) was not significantly different from the positive control (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Despite some limitations of the present study, titanium particles resulting from a standardized implantoplasty can be assumed to be significantly reduced when the tissues/bone were protected with rubber dam and bone wax, or a combination, depending on individual accessibility. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tissue protective measures to reduce or avoid particle contamination during implantoplasty is possible and should be considered and further clinically assessed to avoid iatrogenic inflammatory reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104154252023-08-12 In vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty Platt, A. Liu, C. C. Gubler, A. Naenni, N. Thoma, D. Schmidlin, P. R. Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to study titanium remains in a bone model during standardized implantoplasty under different isolation and protective modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty implants were placed in artificial spongy bone blocks mimicking a horizontal bone loss and implant neck protrusion of 5 mm. Samples were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), which were treated as follows: rubber dam (A), a dental adhesive paste (B), bone wax (C), and an unprotected positive control (D). Implantoplasty was performed using carbide and diamond burs under strict water cooling and standardized suction. After removal of the respective isolation materials, the bone blocks were thoroughly rinsed with tap water for 3 min and titanium chips were collected using a filter integrated in the model. The filter paper was removed and dissolved in 37% hydrochloric acid for 2 h at 120 °C and the titanium remnants were quantified using atomic absorption spectrometry. RESULTS: None of the test groups were able to completely prevent titanium particle contamination. Rubber dam (691 ± 249 µg) and bone wax (516 ± 157 µg) were found to be significantly more protective than the positive control (2313 ± 747 µg) (p < 0.001) with respect to the amount of titanium particles that remained in the bone model after implantoplasty. The adhesive paste group (1863.5 ± 538 µg) was not significantly different from the positive control (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Despite some limitations of the present study, titanium particles resulting from a standardized implantoplasty can be assumed to be significantly reduced when the tissues/bone were protected with rubber dam and bone wax, or a combination, depending on individual accessibility. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tissue protective measures to reduce or avoid particle contamination during implantoplasty is possible and should be considered and further clinically assessed to avoid iatrogenic inflammatory reactions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10415425/ /pubmed/37140763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05037-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Platt, A.
Liu, C. C.
Gubler, A.
Naenni, N.
Thoma, D.
Schmidlin, P. R.
In vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty
title In vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty
title_full In vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty
title_fullStr In vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty
title_full_unstemmed In vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty
title_short In vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty
title_sort in vitro evaluation of different protective techniques to reduce titanium particle contamination during implantoplasty
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37140763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05037-8
work_keys_str_mv AT platta invitroevaluationofdifferentprotectivetechniquestoreducetitaniumparticlecontaminationduringimplantoplasty
AT liucc invitroevaluationofdifferentprotectivetechniquestoreducetitaniumparticlecontaminationduringimplantoplasty
AT gublera invitroevaluationofdifferentprotectivetechniquestoreducetitaniumparticlecontaminationduringimplantoplasty
AT naennin invitroevaluationofdifferentprotectivetechniquestoreducetitaniumparticlecontaminationduringimplantoplasty
AT thomad invitroevaluationofdifferentprotectivetechniquestoreducetitaniumparticlecontaminationduringimplantoplasty
AT schmidlinpr invitroevaluationofdifferentprotectivetechniquestoreducetitaniumparticlecontaminationduringimplantoplasty