Cargando…

Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation

OBJECTIVE: To compare skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in patients with hypodivergent and hyperdivergent growth patterns through cast splint fixed functional appliances (FFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: N = 42 out of n = 47 patients with mandibular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hourfar, Jan, Kinzinger, Gero Stefan Michael, Frye, Linda, Lisson, Jörg Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05105-z
_version_ 1785087538878218240
author Hourfar, Jan
Kinzinger, Gero Stefan Michael
Frye, Linda
Lisson, Jörg Alexander
author_facet Hourfar, Jan
Kinzinger, Gero Stefan Michael
Frye, Linda
Lisson, Jörg Alexander
author_sort Hourfar, Jan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in patients with hypodivergent and hyperdivergent growth patterns through cast splint fixed functional appliances (FFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: N = 42 out of n = 47 patients with mandibular plane angles < 34° or ≥ 34° were divided into a hypodivergent (n = 24) and a hyperdivergent (n = 18) group. All patients received a single-step mandibular advancement protocol through an FFA. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed after initial leveling and alignment (T1) and immediately after FFA removal (T2). The therapeutic effect was calculated through comparison with age-matched controls from a growth survey. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Hypodivergent and hyperdivergent patients showed different treatment outcomes, but significant differences existed only for overbite and interincisal angle. Nearly all measurements suggested similar treatment-related changes for both groups with exception for dentoalveolar parameters. CONCLUSION: Treatment with FFA causes similar skeletal and dentoalveolar effects in hypodivergent and in hyperdivergent patients. The correction of overjet and molar relationship is mainly caused by dentoalveolar changes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hyperdivergent patients do not respond unfavorably to FFA treatment compared to hypodivergent patients. Lower incisor protrusion occurs more pronounced in hypodivergent patients. The growth pattern ought to be considered when choosing FFA for class II treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104154342023-08-12 Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation Hourfar, Jan Kinzinger, Gero Stefan Michael Frye, Linda Lisson, Jörg Alexander Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVE: To compare skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in patients with hypodivergent and hyperdivergent growth patterns through cast splint fixed functional appliances (FFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: N = 42 out of n = 47 patients with mandibular plane angles < 34° or ≥ 34° were divided into a hypodivergent (n = 24) and a hyperdivergent (n = 18) group. All patients received a single-step mandibular advancement protocol through an FFA. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed after initial leveling and alignment (T1) and immediately after FFA removal (T2). The therapeutic effect was calculated through comparison with age-matched controls from a growth survey. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Hypodivergent and hyperdivergent patients showed different treatment outcomes, but significant differences existed only for overbite and interincisal angle. Nearly all measurements suggested similar treatment-related changes for both groups with exception for dentoalveolar parameters. CONCLUSION: Treatment with FFA causes similar skeletal and dentoalveolar effects in hypodivergent and in hyperdivergent patients. The correction of overjet and molar relationship is mainly caused by dentoalveolar changes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hyperdivergent patients do not respond unfavorably to FFA treatment compared to hypodivergent patients. Lower incisor protrusion occurs more pronounced in hypodivergent patients. The growth pattern ought to be considered when choosing FFA for class II treatment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10415434/ /pubmed/37351654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05105-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Hourfar, Jan
Kinzinger, Gero Stefan Michael
Frye, Linda
Lisson, Jörg Alexander
Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation
title Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation
title_full Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation
title_fullStr Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation
title_full_unstemmed Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation
title_short Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation
title_sort effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class ii patients—a retrospective cephalometric investigation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05105-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hourfarjan effectsoffixedfunctionalorthodontictreatmentinhypodivergentandhyperdivergentclassiipatientsaretrospectivecephalometricinvestigation
AT kinzingergerostefanmichael effectsoffixedfunctionalorthodontictreatmentinhypodivergentandhyperdivergentclassiipatientsaretrospectivecephalometricinvestigation
AT fryelinda effectsoffixedfunctionalorthodontictreatmentinhypodivergentandhyperdivergentclassiipatientsaretrospectivecephalometricinvestigation
AT lissonjorgalexander effectsoffixedfunctionalorthodontictreatmentinhypodivergentandhyperdivergentclassiipatientsaretrospectivecephalometricinvestigation