Cargando…

Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding

OBJECTIVE: Evaluating various polishing methods after bracket debonding and excessive attachment material removal for different ceramics and pretreatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Zirconia (ZrO2), leucite (LEU) and lithium disilicate (LiSi) specimens were pretreated with a) silica coated alumina parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jungbauer, Rebecca, Liebermann, Anja, Hammer, Christian M., Edelhoff, Daniel, Proff, Peter, Stawarczyk, Bogna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37166534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05058-3
_version_ 1785087543636656128
author Jungbauer, Rebecca
Liebermann, Anja
Hammer, Christian M.
Edelhoff, Daniel
Proff, Peter
Stawarczyk, Bogna
author_facet Jungbauer, Rebecca
Liebermann, Anja
Hammer, Christian M.
Edelhoff, Daniel
Proff, Peter
Stawarczyk, Bogna
author_sort Jungbauer, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Evaluating various polishing methods after bracket debonding and excessive attachment material removal for different ceramics and pretreatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Zirconia (ZrO2), leucite (LEU) and lithium disilicate (LiSi) specimens were pretreated with a) silica coated alumina particles (CoJet); LEU and LiSi additionally with b) hydrofluoric acid (HF), c) Monobond Etch&Prime (MEP), d) silicium carbide grinder (SiC) before bracket bonding, shearing off, ARI evaluation, excessive attachment material removal and polishing with i) Sof-Lex Discs (Soflex), ii) polishing paste (Paste), iii) polishing set (Set). Before/after polishing surface roughness (Ra) was measured with a profilometer. Martens hardness parameter were also assessed. RESULTS: Irrespective of pretreatment Ra of LEU increased the most, followed by LiSi and ZrO2 (p < 0.001, SiC: p = 0.012), in accordance with the measured Martens hardness parameter. CoJet/SiC caused greater roughness as HF/MEP (p < 0.001). The ZrO2 surface was rougher after polishing with Paste/Set (p < 0.001; p = 0.047). Ra improved in the LEU/CoJet, LEU/SiC and LiSi/SiC groups with Soflex/Set (p < 0.001), in the LiSi/CoJet and LEU/HF groups by Soflex (p = 0.003, p < 0.001) and worsened by Paste (p = 0.017, p < 0.001). Polishing of HF or MEP pretreated LiSi with Set increased Ra (p = 0.001, p < 0.001), so did Paste in the LEU/MEP group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Paste couldn’t improve the surfaces. Soflex was the only method decreasing Ra on rough surfaces and not causing roughness worsening. Polishing of LEU/LiSi after MEP, LEU after HF pretreatment doesn´t seem to have any benefit. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To avoid long-term damage to ceramic restorations, special attention should be paid to the polishing method after orthodontic treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-023-05058-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104154572023-08-12 Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding Jungbauer, Rebecca Liebermann, Anja Hammer, Christian M. Edelhoff, Daniel Proff, Peter Stawarczyk, Bogna Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVE: Evaluating various polishing methods after bracket debonding and excessive attachment material removal for different ceramics and pretreatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Zirconia (ZrO2), leucite (LEU) and lithium disilicate (LiSi) specimens were pretreated with a) silica coated alumina particles (CoJet); LEU and LiSi additionally with b) hydrofluoric acid (HF), c) Monobond Etch&Prime (MEP), d) silicium carbide grinder (SiC) before bracket bonding, shearing off, ARI evaluation, excessive attachment material removal and polishing with i) Sof-Lex Discs (Soflex), ii) polishing paste (Paste), iii) polishing set (Set). Before/after polishing surface roughness (Ra) was measured with a profilometer. Martens hardness parameter were also assessed. RESULTS: Irrespective of pretreatment Ra of LEU increased the most, followed by LiSi and ZrO2 (p < 0.001, SiC: p = 0.012), in accordance with the measured Martens hardness parameter. CoJet/SiC caused greater roughness as HF/MEP (p < 0.001). The ZrO2 surface was rougher after polishing with Paste/Set (p < 0.001; p = 0.047). Ra improved in the LEU/CoJet, LEU/SiC and LiSi/SiC groups with Soflex/Set (p < 0.001), in the LiSi/CoJet and LEU/HF groups by Soflex (p = 0.003, p < 0.001) and worsened by Paste (p = 0.017, p < 0.001). Polishing of HF or MEP pretreated LiSi with Set increased Ra (p = 0.001, p < 0.001), so did Paste in the LEU/MEP group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Paste couldn’t improve the surfaces. Soflex was the only method decreasing Ra on rough surfaces and not causing roughness worsening. Polishing of LEU/LiSi after MEP, LEU after HF pretreatment doesn´t seem to have any benefit. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To avoid long-term damage to ceramic restorations, special attention should be paid to the polishing method after orthodontic treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-023-05058-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10415457/ /pubmed/37166534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05058-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Jungbauer, Rebecca
Liebermann, Anja
Hammer, Christian M.
Edelhoff, Daniel
Proff, Peter
Stawarczyk, Bogna
Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
title Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
title_full Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
title_fullStr Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
title_full_unstemmed Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
title_short Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
title_sort impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37166534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05058-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jungbauerrebecca impactofpolishingsystemonsurfaceroughnessofdifferentceramicsurfacesaftervariouspretreatmentsandbracketdebonding
AT liebermannanja impactofpolishingsystemonsurfaceroughnessofdifferentceramicsurfacesaftervariouspretreatmentsandbracketdebonding
AT hammerchristianm impactofpolishingsystemonsurfaceroughnessofdifferentceramicsurfacesaftervariouspretreatmentsandbracketdebonding
AT edelhoffdaniel impactofpolishingsystemonsurfaceroughnessofdifferentceramicsurfacesaftervariouspretreatmentsandbracketdebonding
AT proffpeter impactofpolishingsystemonsurfaceroughnessofdifferentceramicsurfacesaftervariouspretreatmentsandbracketdebonding
AT stawarczykbogna impactofpolishingsystemonsurfaceroughnessofdifferentceramicsurfacesaftervariouspretreatmentsandbracketdebonding