Cargando…

Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We have previously published the novel method of unilateral pectineal suspension (UPS) for apical prolapse correction. UPS provides mesh-free midline uterus suspension using a single non-absorbable suture to attach the anterior cervix to the lateral part of the iliopecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bolovis, Dimitrios Ilias, Schreibmayer, Michael, Hitzl, Wolfgang, Brucker, Cosima Veronika Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05479-4
_version_ 1785087547868708864
author Bolovis, Dimitrios Ilias
Schreibmayer, Michael
Hitzl, Wolfgang
Brucker, Cosima Veronika Maria
author_facet Bolovis, Dimitrios Ilias
Schreibmayer, Michael
Hitzl, Wolfgang
Brucker, Cosima Veronika Maria
author_sort Bolovis, Dimitrios Ilias
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We have previously published the novel method of unilateral pectineal suspension (UPS) for apical prolapse correction. UPS provides mesh-free midline uterus suspension using a single non-absorbable suture to attach the anterior cervix to the lateral part of the iliopectineal ligament. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the short-term efficacy, perioperative complication rate, and overall patient acceptance of the new UPS surgical concept. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with POP-Q stage 2–4 who underwent robotic UPS between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 were included in the study. Patient data were taken retrospectively from the patient files. Treatment success was the primary endpoint, measured both objectively using a defined composite endpoint and subjectively according to patients’ acceptance 3–6 months after surgery during a follow-up examination. Secondary outcome measures included complications and conversions, and effect of additional procedures on operative time. RESULTS: Treatment success as measured by the defined composite endpoint was 93.6% for the entire cohort. No complications or conversions occurred. Mean operation time for isolated UPS was 46.5 min (n = 33 patients). UPS can be easily combined with additional surgical procedures for repair of remaining pelvic floor defects, incontinence surgery or other indications. Additional procedures performed had a significant influence on operation time (p < 0.0005, n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: UPS shows highly favorable results when looking at an unselected cohort of patients in need of primary POP surgery with respect to established quality parameters of POP repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104154742023-08-12 Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results Bolovis, Dimitrios Ilias Schreibmayer, Michael Hitzl, Wolfgang Brucker, Cosima Veronika Maria Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We have previously published the novel method of unilateral pectineal suspension (UPS) for apical prolapse correction. UPS provides mesh-free midline uterus suspension using a single non-absorbable suture to attach the anterior cervix to the lateral part of the iliopectineal ligament. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the short-term efficacy, perioperative complication rate, and overall patient acceptance of the new UPS surgical concept. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with POP-Q stage 2–4 who underwent robotic UPS between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 were included in the study. Patient data were taken retrospectively from the patient files. Treatment success was the primary endpoint, measured both objectively using a defined composite endpoint and subjectively according to patients’ acceptance 3–6 months after surgery during a follow-up examination. Secondary outcome measures included complications and conversions, and effect of additional procedures on operative time. RESULTS: Treatment success as measured by the defined composite endpoint was 93.6% for the entire cohort. No complications or conversions occurred. Mean operation time for isolated UPS was 46.5 min (n = 33 patients). UPS can be easily combined with additional surgical procedures for repair of remaining pelvic floor defects, incontinence surgery or other indications. Additional procedures performed had a significant influence on operation time (p < 0.0005, n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: UPS shows highly favorable results when looking at an unselected cohort of patients in need of primary POP surgery with respect to established quality parameters of POP repair. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10415474/ /pubmed/36786854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05479-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bolovis, Dimitrios Ilias
Schreibmayer, Michael
Hitzl, Wolfgang
Brucker, Cosima Veronika Maria
Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results
title Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results
title_full Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results
title_fullStr Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results
title_short Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results
title_sort retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05479-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bolovisdimitriosilias retrospectiveanalysisofapicalprolapsecorrectionbyunilateralpectinealsuspensionperioperativeandshorttermresults
AT schreibmayermichael retrospectiveanalysisofapicalprolapsecorrectionbyunilateralpectinealsuspensionperioperativeandshorttermresults
AT hitzlwolfgang retrospectiveanalysisofapicalprolapsecorrectionbyunilateralpectinealsuspensionperioperativeandshorttermresults
AT bruckercosimaveronikamaria retrospectiveanalysisofapicalprolapsecorrectionbyunilateralpectinealsuspensionperioperativeandshorttermresults