Cargando…
Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
PURPOSE: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the current different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimes for bladder cancer patients to rank them. METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in NMA of six different therapy regimens cisplatin, cisplatin/doxorubicin, (ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w |
_version_ | 1785087551665602560 |
---|---|
author | Aydh, Abdulmajeed Sari Motlagh, Reza Alamri, Abdulaziz Yanagisawa, Takafumi Ayed, Adil Rajwa, Pawel Laukhtina, Ekaterina Alasiri, Saeed M. Kawada, Tatsushi Mostafai, Hadi Ayidh, Abdulelah Pallauf, Maximilian König, Frederik Abufaraj, Mohammad Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Shariat, Shahrokh F. |
author_facet | Aydh, Abdulmajeed Sari Motlagh, Reza Alamri, Abdulaziz Yanagisawa, Takafumi Ayed, Adil Rajwa, Pawel Laukhtina, Ekaterina Alasiri, Saeed M. Kawada, Tatsushi Mostafai, Hadi Ayidh, Abdulelah Pallauf, Maximilian König, Frederik Abufaraj, Mohammad Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Shariat, Shahrokh F. |
author_sort | Aydh, Abdulmajeed |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the current different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimes for bladder cancer patients to rank them. METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in NMA of six different therapy regimens cisplatin, cisplatin/doxorubicin, (gemcitabine/cisplatin) GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine (MCV) and (MVAC) compared to locoregional treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprised 4276 patients who met the eligibility criteria. Six different regimes were not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of overall mortality rate compared to local treatment alone. In progression-free survival (PFS) rates, cisplatin, GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, MCV and MVAC were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of PFS rate compared to locoregional treatment alone. In local control outcome, MCV, MVAC, GC and cisplatin/methotrexate were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of local control rate versus locoregional treatment alone. Nevertheless, based on the analyses of the treatment ranking according to SUCRA, it was highly likely that MVAC with high certainty of results appeared as the most effective approach in terms of mortality, PFS and local control rates. GC and cisplatin/doxorubicin with low certainty of results was found to be the best second options. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in mortality, progression-free survival and local control rates before and after adjusting the type of definitive treatment in any of the six study arms. However, MVAC was found to be the most effective regimen with high certainty, while cisplatin alone and cisplatin/methotrexate should not be recommended as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regime. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10415490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104154902023-08-12 Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes Aydh, Abdulmajeed Sari Motlagh, Reza Alamri, Abdulaziz Yanagisawa, Takafumi Ayed, Adil Rajwa, Pawel Laukhtina, Ekaterina Alasiri, Saeed M. Kawada, Tatsushi Mostafai, Hadi Ayidh, Abdulelah Pallauf, Maximilian König, Frederik Abufaraj, Mohammad Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Shariat, Shahrokh F. World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the current different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimes for bladder cancer patients to rank them. METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in NMA of six different therapy regimens cisplatin, cisplatin/doxorubicin, (gemcitabine/cisplatin) GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine (MCV) and (MVAC) compared to locoregional treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprised 4276 patients who met the eligibility criteria. Six different regimes were not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of overall mortality rate compared to local treatment alone. In progression-free survival (PFS) rates, cisplatin, GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, MCV and MVAC were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of PFS rate compared to locoregional treatment alone. In local control outcome, MCV, MVAC, GC and cisplatin/methotrexate were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of local control rate versus locoregional treatment alone. Nevertheless, based on the analyses of the treatment ranking according to SUCRA, it was highly likely that MVAC with high certainty of results appeared as the most effective approach in terms of mortality, PFS and local control rates. GC and cisplatin/doxorubicin with low certainty of results was found to be the best second options. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in mortality, progression-free survival and local control rates before and after adjusting the type of definitive treatment in any of the six study arms. However, MVAC was found to be the most effective regimen with high certainty, while cisplatin alone and cisplatin/methotrexate should not be recommended as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regime. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10415490/ /pubmed/37347252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aydh, Abdulmajeed Sari Motlagh, Reza Alamri, Abdulaziz Yanagisawa, Takafumi Ayed, Adil Rajwa, Pawel Laukhtina, Ekaterina Alasiri, Saeed M. Kawada, Tatsushi Mostafai, Hadi Ayidh, Abdulelah Pallauf, Maximilian König, Frederik Abufaraj, Mohammad Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Shariat, Shahrokh F. Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes |
title | Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes |
title_full | Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes |
title_fullStr | Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes |
title_short | Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes |
title_sort | comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aydhabdulmajeed comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT sarimotlaghreza comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT alamriabdulaziz comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT yanagisawatakafumi comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT ayedadil comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT rajwapawel comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT laukhtinaekaterina comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT alasirisaeedm comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT kawadatatsushi comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT mostafaihadi comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT ayidhabdulelah comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT pallaufmaximilian comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT konigfrederik comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT abufarajmohammad comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT karakiewiczpierrei comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes AT shariatshahrokhf comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes |