Cargando…

Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes

PURPOSE: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the current different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimes for bladder cancer patients to rank them. METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in NMA of six different therapy regimens cisplatin, cisplatin/doxorubicin, (ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aydh, Abdulmajeed, Sari Motlagh, Reza, Alamri, Abdulaziz, Yanagisawa, Takafumi, Ayed, Adil, Rajwa, Pawel, Laukhtina, Ekaterina, Alasiri, Saeed M., Kawada, Tatsushi, Mostafai, Hadi, Ayidh, Abdulelah, Pallauf, Maximilian, König, Frederik, Abufaraj, Mohammad, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w
_version_ 1785087551665602560
author Aydh, Abdulmajeed
Sari Motlagh, Reza
Alamri, Abdulaziz
Yanagisawa, Takafumi
Ayed, Adil
Rajwa, Pawel
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Alasiri, Saeed M.
Kawada, Tatsushi
Mostafai, Hadi
Ayidh, Abdulelah
Pallauf, Maximilian
König, Frederik
Abufaraj, Mohammad
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
author_facet Aydh, Abdulmajeed
Sari Motlagh, Reza
Alamri, Abdulaziz
Yanagisawa, Takafumi
Ayed, Adil
Rajwa, Pawel
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Alasiri, Saeed M.
Kawada, Tatsushi
Mostafai, Hadi
Ayidh, Abdulelah
Pallauf, Maximilian
König, Frederik
Abufaraj, Mohammad
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
author_sort Aydh, Abdulmajeed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the current different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimes for bladder cancer patients to rank them. METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in NMA of six different therapy regimens cisplatin, cisplatin/doxorubicin, (gemcitabine/cisplatin) GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine (MCV) and (MVAC) compared to locoregional treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprised 4276 patients who met the eligibility criteria. Six different regimes were not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of overall mortality rate compared to local treatment alone. In progression-free survival (PFS) rates, cisplatin, GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, MCV and MVAC were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of PFS rate compared to locoregional treatment alone. In local control outcome, MCV, MVAC, GC and cisplatin/methotrexate were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of local control rate versus locoregional treatment alone. Nevertheless, based on the analyses of the treatment ranking according to SUCRA, it was highly likely that MVAC with high certainty of results appeared as the most effective approach in terms of mortality, PFS and local control rates. GC and cisplatin/doxorubicin with low certainty of results was found to be the best second options. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in mortality, progression-free survival and local control rates before and after adjusting the type of definitive treatment in any of the six study arms. However, MVAC was found to be the most effective regimen with high certainty, while cisplatin alone and cisplatin/methotrexate should not be recommended as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regime. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104154902023-08-12 Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes Aydh, Abdulmajeed Sari Motlagh, Reza Alamri, Abdulaziz Yanagisawa, Takafumi Ayed, Adil Rajwa, Pawel Laukhtina, Ekaterina Alasiri, Saeed M. Kawada, Tatsushi Mostafai, Hadi Ayidh, Abdulelah Pallauf, Maximilian König, Frederik Abufaraj, Mohammad Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Shariat, Shahrokh F. World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The present systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the current different neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimes for bladder cancer patients to rank them. METHODS: We used the Bayesian approach in NMA of six different therapy regimens cisplatin, cisplatin/doxorubicin, (gemcitabine/cisplatin) GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine (MCV) and (MVAC) compared to locoregional treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprised 4276 patients who met the eligibility criteria. Six different regimes were not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of overall mortality rate compared to local treatment alone. In progression-free survival (PFS) rates, cisplatin, GC, cisplatin/methotrexate, MCV and MVAC were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of PFS rate compared to locoregional treatment alone. In local control outcome, MCV, MVAC, GC and cisplatin/methotrexate were not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of local control rate versus locoregional treatment alone. Nevertheless, based on the analyses of the treatment ranking according to SUCRA, it was highly likely that MVAC with high certainty of results appeared as the most effective approach in terms of mortality, PFS and local control rates. GC and cisplatin/doxorubicin with low certainty of results was found to be the best second options. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in mortality, progression-free survival and local control rates before and after adjusting the type of definitive treatment in any of the six study arms. However, MVAC was found to be the most effective regimen with high certainty, while cisplatin alone and cisplatin/methotrexate should not be recommended as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regime. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10415490/ /pubmed/37347252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Aydh, Abdulmajeed
Sari Motlagh, Reza
Alamri, Abdulaziz
Yanagisawa, Takafumi
Ayed, Adil
Rajwa, Pawel
Laukhtina, Ekaterina
Alasiri, Saeed M.
Kawada, Tatsushi
Mostafai, Hadi
Ayidh, Abdulelah
Pallauf, Maximilian
König, Frederik
Abufaraj, Mohammad
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
title Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
title_full Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
title_fullStr Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
title_short Comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
title_sort comparison between different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and local therapy alone for bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04478-w
work_keys_str_mv AT aydhabdulmajeed comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT sarimotlaghreza comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT alamriabdulaziz comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT yanagisawatakafumi comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT ayedadil comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT rajwapawel comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT laukhtinaekaterina comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT alasirisaeedm comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT kawadatatsushi comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT mostafaihadi comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT ayidhabdulelah comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT pallaufmaximilian comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT konigfrederik comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT abufarajmohammad comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT karakiewiczpierrei comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes
AT shariatshahrokhf comparisonbetweendifferentneoadjuvantchemotherapyregimensandlocaltherapyaloneforbladdercancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofoncologicoutcomes