Cargando…

The contralateral-based submental artery island flap: feasibility and oncological safety in oral cancer–related defect reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: Oncologic risk is a serious concern of submental artery island flaps. Here, we introduce the contralateral-based submental artery island flap (C-SAIF) and demonstrate its feasibility and long-term oncological safety in reconstructing oral cancer–related defects. METHODS: An anatomical st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Jingxin, Zhai, Xuefan, Huang, Min, Li, Peiyao, Liang, Yujie, Ouyang, Daiqiao, Su, Yu-xiong, Yang, Wei-fa, Liao, Guiqing, Zhang, Sien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05103-1
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Oncologic risk is a serious concern of submental artery island flaps. Here, we introduce the contralateral-based submental artery island flap (C-SAIF) and demonstrate its feasibility and long-term oncological safety in reconstructing oral cancer–related defects. METHODS: An anatomical study was performed concentrating on the pedicle length in seven cadavers. Then, a retrospective study was carried out on C-SAIF patients operated on by a single team. The standard surgical technique of C-SAIF was conducted. Outcomes including operative time, length of hospital stay, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and scores of the Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society (MSGS) questionnaire were compared with a similar cohort reconstructed with anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTF). In addition, oncological outcomes were evaluated by the 5-year cumulative survival rate between C-SAIF and ALTF patients. RESULTS: The pedicle length of C-SAIF was sufficient for the flap to be extended to the contralateral oral cavity. Fifty-two patients were included in the retrospective study, and nineteen of them underwent reconstruction with C-SAIF. The operative time of C-SAIF was shorter (p = 0.003), and the intraoperative blood loss was less (p = 0.004) than that of ALTF. There was no difference in MSGS scores. The results of survival analysis revealed comparable survival curves for the two groups in terms of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: C-SAIF is a feasible and reliable flap for reconstructing oral cancer–related defects. Moreover, it is an effective island flap to preserve the perforator and pedicle without compromising oncological safety. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-023-05103-1.