Cargando…
Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of the reciprocity law in ultraviolet excimer therapy. This study aimed to examine the difference in erythematous reaction in human skin when the irradiance of ultraviolet excimer treatment devices differed while the irradiation dose was consta...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37632181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13437 |
_version_ | 1785087642419855360 |
---|---|
author | Togawa, Yaei Kawashima, Shusuke Nagai, Kazue Kawasaki, Yohei Matsue, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Togawa, Yaei Kawashima, Shusuke Nagai, Kazue Kawasaki, Yohei Matsue, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Togawa, Yaei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of the reciprocity law in ultraviolet excimer therapy. This study aimed to examine the difference in erythematous reaction in human skin when the irradiance of ultraviolet excimer treatment devices differed while the irradiation dose was constant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study, conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Chiba University, included 15 healthy adults aged 20–65 years (mean age, 46.3 years; seven men). Using ultraviolet excimer treatment devices with different irradiances (50 or 150 mW/cm(2)), the upper abdomen of each participant was irradiated with ultraviolet light at set irradiation doses (80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 mJ/cm(2)). The erythema index of each irradiated site was measured using a melanin‐ and erythema‐measuring device, and the difference in erythema index before and 24 h after irradiation was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The change in erythema index was significantly higher for an irradiance of 150 mW/cm(2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between these irradiance levels at irradiation doses of 100‒200 mJ/cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: Even for the same irradiation dose, stronger erythematous reactions occurred at higher irradiances in ultraviolet excimer treatment. This suggests that the reciprocity law may not always hold true in excimer therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10415868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104158682023-08-11 Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law Togawa, Yaei Kawashima, Shusuke Nagai, Kazue Kawasaki, Yohei Matsue, Hiroyuki Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of the reciprocity law in ultraviolet excimer therapy. This study aimed to examine the difference in erythematous reaction in human skin when the irradiance of ultraviolet excimer treatment devices differed while the irradiation dose was constant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study, conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Chiba University, included 15 healthy adults aged 20–65 years (mean age, 46.3 years; seven men). Using ultraviolet excimer treatment devices with different irradiances (50 or 150 mW/cm(2)), the upper abdomen of each participant was irradiated with ultraviolet light at set irradiation doses (80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 mJ/cm(2)). The erythema index of each irradiated site was measured using a melanin‐ and erythema‐measuring device, and the difference in erythema index before and 24 h after irradiation was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The change in erythema index was significantly higher for an irradiance of 150 mW/cm(2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between these irradiance levels at irradiation doses of 100‒200 mJ/cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: Even for the same irradiation dose, stronger erythematous reactions occurred at higher irradiances in ultraviolet excimer treatment. This suggests that the reciprocity law may not always hold true in excimer therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10415868/ /pubmed/37632181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13437 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Togawa, Yaei Kawashima, Shusuke Nagai, Kazue Kawasaki, Yohei Matsue, Hiroyuki Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law |
title | Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law |
title_full | Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law |
title_fullStr | Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law |
title_full_unstemmed | Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law |
title_short | Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law |
title_sort | erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: reconsidering the reciprocity law |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37632181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT togawayaei erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw AT kawashimashusuke erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw AT nagaikazue erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw AT kawasakiyohei erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw AT matsuehiroyuki erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw |