Cargando…

Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of the reciprocity law in ultraviolet excimer therapy. This study aimed to examine the difference in erythematous reaction in human skin when the irradiance of ultraviolet excimer treatment devices differed while the irradiation dose was consta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Togawa, Yaei, Kawashima, Shusuke, Nagai, Kazue, Kawasaki, Yohei, Matsue, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37632181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13437
_version_ 1785087642419855360
author Togawa, Yaei
Kawashima, Shusuke
Nagai, Kazue
Kawasaki, Yohei
Matsue, Hiroyuki
author_facet Togawa, Yaei
Kawashima, Shusuke
Nagai, Kazue
Kawasaki, Yohei
Matsue, Hiroyuki
author_sort Togawa, Yaei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of the reciprocity law in ultraviolet excimer therapy. This study aimed to examine the difference in erythematous reaction in human skin when the irradiance of ultraviolet excimer treatment devices differed while the irradiation dose was constant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study, conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Chiba University, included 15 healthy adults aged 20–65 years (mean age, 46.3 years; seven men). Using ultraviolet excimer treatment devices with different irradiances (50 or 150 mW/cm(2)), the upper abdomen of each participant was irradiated with ultraviolet light at set irradiation doses (80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 mJ/cm(2)). The erythema index of each irradiated site was measured using a melanin‐ and erythema‐measuring device, and the difference in erythema index before and 24 h after irradiation was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The change in erythema index was significantly higher for an irradiance of 150 mW/cm(2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between these irradiance levels at irradiation doses of 100‒200 mJ/cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: Even for the same irradiation dose, stronger erythematous reactions occurred at higher irradiances in ultraviolet excimer treatment. This suggests that the reciprocity law may not always hold true in excimer therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10415868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104158682023-08-11 Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law Togawa, Yaei Kawashima, Shusuke Nagai, Kazue Kawasaki, Yohei Matsue, Hiroyuki Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the effectiveness of the reciprocity law in ultraviolet excimer therapy. This study aimed to examine the difference in erythematous reaction in human skin when the irradiance of ultraviolet excimer treatment devices differed while the irradiation dose was constant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study, conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Chiba University, included 15 healthy adults aged 20–65 years (mean age, 46.3 years; seven men). Using ultraviolet excimer treatment devices with different irradiances (50 or 150 mW/cm(2)), the upper abdomen of each participant was irradiated with ultraviolet light at set irradiation doses (80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 mJ/cm(2)). The erythema index of each irradiated site was measured using a melanin‐ and erythema‐measuring device, and the difference in erythema index before and 24 h after irradiation was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The change in erythema index was significantly higher for an irradiance of 150 mW/cm(2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between these irradiance levels at irradiation doses of 100‒200 mJ/cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: Even for the same irradiation dose, stronger erythematous reactions occurred at higher irradiances in ultraviolet excimer treatment. This suggests that the reciprocity law may not always hold true in excimer therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10415868/ /pubmed/37632181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13437 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Togawa, Yaei
Kawashima, Shusuke
Nagai, Kazue
Kawasaki, Yohei
Matsue, Hiroyuki
Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law
title Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law
title_full Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law
title_fullStr Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law
title_full_unstemmed Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law
title_short Erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: Reconsidering the reciprocity law
title_sort erythematous reactions to two ultraviolet excimer therapy devices with different irradiance levels: reconsidering the reciprocity law
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37632181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13437
work_keys_str_mv AT togawayaei erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw
AT kawashimashusuke erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw
AT nagaikazue erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw
AT kawasakiyohei erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw
AT matsuehiroyuki erythematousreactionstotwoultravioletexcimertherapydeviceswithdifferentirradiancelevelsreconsideringthereciprocitylaw