Cargando…
Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review
Vitiligo is a multifaceted autoimmune depigmenting disorder affecting around 0.5 to 2.0% of individuals globally. Standardizing diagnosis and therapy tracking can be arduous, as numerous clinical evaluation methods are subject to interobserver variability and may not be validated. Therefore, there i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1200963 |
_version_ | 1785087699081756672 |
---|---|
author | Abdi, Parsa Anthony, Michelle R. Farkouh, Christopher Chan, Airiss R. Kooner, Amritpal Qureshi, Simal Maibach, Howard |
author_facet | Abdi, Parsa Anthony, Michelle R. Farkouh, Christopher Chan, Airiss R. Kooner, Amritpal Qureshi, Simal Maibach, Howard |
author_sort | Abdi, Parsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vitiligo is a multifaceted autoimmune depigmenting disorder affecting around 0.5 to 2.0% of individuals globally. Standardizing diagnosis and therapy tracking can be arduous, as numerous clinical evaluation methods are subject to interobserver variability and may not be validated. Therefore, there is a need for diagnostic tools that are objective, dependable, and preferably non-invasive. AIMS: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the non-invasive objective skin measurement methods that are currently used to evaluate the diagnosis, severity, and progression of vitiligo, as well as the advantages and limitations of each technique. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used for the systematic review. Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for non-invasive imaging and biophysical skin measuring methods to diagnose, evaluate the severity of, or monitor the effects of vitiligo treatment. The risk of bias in included articles was assessed using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment scale. RESULTS: An extensive literature search resulted in 64 studies for analysis, describing eight imaging techniques (reflectance confocal microscopy, computer-aided imaging analysis, optical coherence tomography, infrared photography, third-harmonic generation microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, ultraviolet light photography, and visible light/digital photograph), and three biophysical approaches (dermoscopy, colorimetry, spectrometry) used in diagnosing and assessing vitiligo. Pertinent information about functionality, mechanisms of action, sensitivity, and specificity was obtained for all studies, and insights into the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic technique were addressed. Methodological study quality was adequate; however, statistical analysis was not achievable because of the variety of methods evaluated and the non-standardized reporting of diagnostic accuracy results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review can enhance clinical practice and research by providing a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of non-invasive imaging and biophysical techniques in vitiligo assessment. Studies with larger sample sizes and sound methodology are required to develop verified methods for use in future practice and research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: (PROSPERO) database, (CRD42023395996). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10416110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104161102023-08-12 Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review Abdi, Parsa Anthony, Michelle R. Farkouh, Christopher Chan, Airiss R. Kooner, Amritpal Qureshi, Simal Maibach, Howard Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Vitiligo is a multifaceted autoimmune depigmenting disorder affecting around 0.5 to 2.0% of individuals globally. Standardizing diagnosis and therapy tracking can be arduous, as numerous clinical evaluation methods are subject to interobserver variability and may not be validated. Therefore, there is a need for diagnostic tools that are objective, dependable, and preferably non-invasive. AIMS: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the non-invasive objective skin measurement methods that are currently used to evaluate the diagnosis, severity, and progression of vitiligo, as well as the advantages and limitations of each technique. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used for the systematic review. Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for non-invasive imaging and biophysical skin measuring methods to diagnose, evaluate the severity of, or monitor the effects of vitiligo treatment. The risk of bias in included articles was assessed using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment scale. RESULTS: An extensive literature search resulted in 64 studies for analysis, describing eight imaging techniques (reflectance confocal microscopy, computer-aided imaging analysis, optical coherence tomography, infrared photography, third-harmonic generation microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, ultraviolet light photography, and visible light/digital photograph), and three biophysical approaches (dermoscopy, colorimetry, spectrometry) used in diagnosing and assessing vitiligo. Pertinent information about functionality, mechanisms of action, sensitivity, and specificity was obtained for all studies, and insights into the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic technique were addressed. Methodological study quality was adequate; however, statistical analysis was not achievable because of the variety of methods evaluated and the non-standardized reporting of diagnostic accuracy results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review can enhance clinical practice and research by providing a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of non-invasive imaging and biophysical techniques in vitiligo assessment. Studies with larger sample sizes and sound methodology are required to develop verified methods for use in future practice and research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: (PROSPERO) database, (CRD42023395996). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10416110/ /pubmed/37575985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1200963 Text en Copyright © 2023 Abdi, Anthony, Farkouh, Chan, Kooner, Qureshi and Maibach. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Abdi, Parsa Anthony, Michelle R. Farkouh, Christopher Chan, Airiss R. Kooner, Amritpal Qureshi, Simal Maibach, Howard Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review |
title | Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review |
title_full | Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review |
title_short | Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review |
title_sort | non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1200963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdiparsa noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview AT anthonymicheller noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview AT farkouhchristopher noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview AT chanairissr noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview AT kooneramritpal noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview AT qureshisimal noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview AT maibachhoward noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview |