Cargando…

Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review

Vitiligo is a multifaceted autoimmune depigmenting disorder affecting around 0.5 to 2.0% of individuals globally. Standardizing diagnosis and therapy tracking can be arduous, as numerous clinical evaluation methods are subject to interobserver variability and may not be validated. Therefore, there i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdi, Parsa, Anthony, Michelle R., Farkouh, Christopher, Chan, Airiss R., Kooner, Amritpal, Qureshi, Simal, Maibach, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575985
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1200963
_version_ 1785087699081756672
author Abdi, Parsa
Anthony, Michelle R.
Farkouh, Christopher
Chan, Airiss R.
Kooner, Amritpal
Qureshi, Simal
Maibach, Howard
author_facet Abdi, Parsa
Anthony, Michelle R.
Farkouh, Christopher
Chan, Airiss R.
Kooner, Amritpal
Qureshi, Simal
Maibach, Howard
author_sort Abdi, Parsa
collection PubMed
description Vitiligo is a multifaceted autoimmune depigmenting disorder affecting around 0.5 to 2.0% of individuals globally. Standardizing diagnosis and therapy tracking can be arduous, as numerous clinical evaluation methods are subject to interobserver variability and may not be validated. Therefore, there is a need for diagnostic tools that are objective, dependable, and preferably non-invasive. AIMS: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the non-invasive objective skin measurement methods that are currently used to evaluate the diagnosis, severity, and progression of vitiligo, as well as the advantages and limitations of each technique. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used for the systematic review. Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for non-invasive imaging and biophysical skin measuring methods to diagnose, evaluate the severity of, or monitor the effects of vitiligo treatment. The risk of bias in included articles was assessed using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment scale. RESULTS: An extensive literature search resulted in 64 studies for analysis, describing eight imaging techniques (reflectance confocal microscopy, computer-aided imaging analysis, optical coherence tomography, infrared photography, third-harmonic generation microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, ultraviolet light photography, and visible light/digital photograph), and three biophysical approaches (dermoscopy, colorimetry, spectrometry) used in diagnosing and assessing vitiligo. Pertinent information about functionality, mechanisms of action, sensitivity, and specificity was obtained for all studies, and insights into the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic technique were addressed. Methodological study quality was adequate; however, statistical analysis was not achievable because of the variety of methods evaluated and the non-standardized reporting of diagnostic accuracy results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review can enhance clinical practice and research by providing a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of non-invasive imaging and biophysical techniques in vitiligo assessment. Studies with larger sample sizes and sound methodology are required to develop verified methods for use in future practice and research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: (PROSPERO) database, (CRD42023395996).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104161102023-08-12 Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review Abdi, Parsa Anthony, Michelle R. Farkouh, Christopher Chan, Airiss R. Kooner, Amritpal Qureshi, Simal Maibach, Howard Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Vitiligo is a multifaceted autoimmune depigmenting disorder affecting around 0.5 to 2.0% of individuals globally. Standardizing diagnosis and therapy tracking can be arduous, as numerous clinical evaluation methods are subject to interobserver variability and may not be validated. Therefore, there is a need for diagnostic tools that are objective, dependable, and preferably non-invasive. AIMS: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the non-invasive objective skin measurement methods that are currently used to evaluate the diagnosis, severity, and progression of vitiligo, as well as the advantages and limitations of each technique. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used for the systematic review. Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for non-invasive imaging and biophysical skin measuring methods to diagnose, evaluate the severity of, or monitor the effects of vitiligo treatment. The risk of bias in included articles was assessed using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment scale. RESULTS: An extensive literature search resulted in 64 studies for analysis, describing eight imaging techniques (reflectance confocal microscopy, computer-aided imaging analysis, optical coherence tomography, infrared photography, third-harmonic generation microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, ultraviolet light photography, and visible light/digital photograph), and three biophysical approaches (dermoscopy, colorimetry, spectrometry) used in diagnosing and assessing vitiligo. Pertinent information about functionality, mechanisms of action, sensitivity, and specificity was obtained for all studies, and insights into the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic technique were addressed. Methodological study quality was adequate; however, statistical analysis was not achievable because of the variety of methods evaluated and the non-standardized reporting of diagnostic accuracy results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review can enhance clinical practice and research by providing a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of non-invasive imaging and biophysical techniques in vitiligo assessment. Studies with larger sample sizes and sound methodology are required to develop verified methods for use in future practice and research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: (PROSPERO) database, (CRD42023395996). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10416110/ /pubmed/37575985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1200963 Text en Copyright © 2023 Abdi, Anthony, Farkouh, Chan, Kooner, Qureshi and Maibach. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Abdi, Parsa
Anthony, Michelle R.
Farkouh, Christopher
Chan, Airiss R.
Kooner, Amritpal
Qureshi, Simal
Maibach, Howard
Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review
title Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review
title_full Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review
title_fullStr Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review
title_short Non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review
title_sort non-invasive skin measurement methods and diagnostics for vitiligo: a systematic review
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575985
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1200963
work_keys_str_mv AT abdiparsa noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview
AT anthonymicheller noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview
AT farkouhchristopher noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview
AT chanairissr noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview
AT kooneramritpal noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview
AT qureshisimal noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview
AT maibachhoward noninvasiveskinmeasurementmethodsanddiagnosticsforvitiligoasystematicreview